C'mon.... Give Christians a Break!

I'm not a big fan of Saguenay mayor, Jean Tremblay, the man in the eye of the storm regarding prayers at city council meetings, but that being said, he was elected by the good townsfolk of his constituency and he seems to enjoy their support. Read the background story.

The question of prayers before council meetings seems like a cut and dried issue in our society that is moving towards secularism, though no real political debate has ever really been undertaken and no societal consensus ever reached against retaining aspects of our Quebec Christian heritage and beliefs in Judeo-Christian principles that has been and remains the basis of our society.

The principle of separation of church and state is well established and accepted by all. The days where the senior members of the Catholic church advise or influence the government in any way are long gone and even secularists would stipulate to that.
To maintain that conserving the crucifix in Parliament or placing a Christmas tree on the front lawn is an assault on that separation of powers is unsupportable.

Perhaps secularists are inspired by the American system that strictly forbids any public display of faith, but that doesn't mean that those rules are necessarily suited to us.
A free and democratic state is one where society is ordered according to the wishes of the majority, within reason, of course.
We recognize that this majority can sometimes, in a moment of excitement or delirium, make mistakes, so we voluntarily limit what we can do by way of a constitution.

And so we have a Constitution that defines what we can do, a Parliament that enacts laws within the constraints of that constitution and an independent judicial system that insures that everyone is obeying the rules. It's a pretty good system.

Human rights tribunals were established to insure that individual members of society are treated fairly under the law. It seemed like a good idea at the time.
When, for example, a group of Black people are systematically refused entrance to a night club, in an attempt by management to keep the premises 'white,' it is an appropriate job of the Human Rights commission to intervene on behalf of citizens that have been wronged.

But our Human Rights Commissions (all across Canada) have degenerated into nothing less than out of control, unsanctioned extra-Parliamentary political bodies which have usurped power to impose an ultra-liberal, ultra-feminist, secularist agenda on society.

Unlike our established court system, these tribunals are anything but impartial, believing in principle that society must change to suit the individual and that personal rights are more important than societal rights. It's a viewpoint not shared by most of us, yet because we have abdicated political power to these commissions instead of respecting our elected Parliament to decide these issues, we are now reaping the rewards of that folly.

If the majority of citizens want to have a Christmas tree on the front lawn of Parliament or a short Christian prayer before a meeting, as a people, it is our choice to decide. Society belongs to the people, not Human Rights Tribunals.

Now if as a majority we decide that everyone be obliged to convert to Christianity, our constitution and our courts will set us right. It's a fair system of checks and balances, rules that the Star Chamber Human Rights Commission completely sidestep.


The good citizens of the Lac-St-Jean region are 98% Catholic and although most don't go to church each week, almost all of them consider themselves Christians and would probably tell you that they agree with a little Christian prayer at the beginning of council meetings. If enough citizens disagree, there is always the choice of the ballot box. It's called the democratic system.

There are those, who in wishing to impose secularism on everyone, argue that favouring one religion over another, or favouring religion over the absence of religion, is necessarily unfair.

I cannot say with certainty that the mayor has done anything of the sort. He offers a Christian prayer at the beginning of the meeting, where the majority is Christian, but should a secularist demand a silent moment of reflection from the mayor, I'm sure he'd indulge. If perhaps a Jew or a Muslim or Native would on occasion ask for the opportunity to bless the works of the council, I'd hope he'd also be accommodating.

It seems to me that our Human Rights Tribunals, right across the country have placed Christians and Jews firmly in their sights, siding with the secularists, radical Muslims and ultra-left-wingers who wish to impose a different brand of society on the majority.

How is it that not one secularist complained about the Native participation at the Vancouver Olympic Games opening ceremonies? The natives presented various dances of a religious nature where their own native Gods were entreated for various supplications on behalf of all?
Could you imagine the clamour if a Christian priest recited the Lord's Prayer or a Jewish rabbi offered  a short prayer of good luck in Hebrew?
Before the ceremony would be over, I imagine there'd be a slew of Human Rights complaints filed right across the country by secularists!

Years ago a Christian wouldn't be caught dead in a mosque or synagogue. Jews, Muslims and other minority religious denominations would stick strictly to themselves.
Today there's hardly a wedding in a church, mosque or synagogue that doesn't include guests of different faiths. We as a people have progressed where we are no longer afraid to accept the faith of others.
It's a good thing.

Christmas trees in front of City Halls cause offense only to those who are radicals.
In front of some Montreal suburban town halls with significant Jewish populations, a large lighted candelabra celebrating the Jewish holiday of Channukah is offered. Who is offended? Only radicals.

When the Chinese celebrate their faith with a public parade celebrating the New Year, according to their faith, who doesn't want to participate?
 
The truth is that our society has progressed to where we accept and even celebrate each others culture and faith. To take that away would diminish all.

Many years ago, when my son was a toddler, he was often frightened by the 'scary' parts in some movies, even those rated PG. Sitting beside me he would take both his hands and cover his eyes for the duration of the scene. It was a good solution. I don't think it would have been reasonable for me to complain to the theatre to eliminate these scenes.
To secularists who are offended by a thirty second prayer, here's my advice- Stick your fingers in your ears!

If secularists are offended by a short prayer, too bad. It is a Human rights Commission tenet that when an individual is offended, all society must change to accommodate them. What hogwash!

Many things in society offend me as well, I learn to live with it.

It is high time that the Quebec government take the bull by the horns by declaring exactly how we define our society. We need legislation clearly stating who and what we are. These choices are up to our elected Parliament to decide, after a vigorous and open debate.

There is no shame in declaring ourselves a society that recognizes its Christian past and one that maintains its core belief in Judeo-Christian values.

That being said we must tell all our citizens clearly that religious freedom is a sacrosanct pillar of our society, but that not every archaic religious practice can be tolerated in modern society.

There are some people who do not believe in the above. Fair enough.
But they are the minority and it is incumbent on them to accept the terms of society as defined by the majority.

French versus English -Volume 23

SAQ accused of colonialism

Michel Phaneuf, a big shot Quebec wine connoisseur who writes an annual guide to the wines offered at the SAQ, the Quebec liquor monopoly, has taken the organization to task for partnering with an American wine expert, James Suckling, in a promotion.
Obviously annoyed he offered this pearl; 

"The SAQ does not need to do this. It is a form of colonialism. Like an American opinion is better than another. It seems to me that Quebec, with all its talent, editors, critics and sommeliers need not rely on the opinion of a Californian columnist"

Colonialism? Actually, it sounds more like sour grapes to me!

OQLF to attack English Store names

Louise Marchand-very professional

Last week I caught some heat for calling the new director of the l'Office québécois de la langue française (OQLF) ugly, so from now on I shall refer to her as the 'very professional' Louise Marchand.  She happens, by the way, to be in a bit of a snit over the fact that in the Saint-Roch district of Quebec City, horrors of horrors, she spotted an Urban Outfitters store alongside  Mountain Equipment Co-op, not far from City Café.

And so the 'very professional' director of the OQLF has set herself a goal of francizing the names of stores such as American Apparel, Old Navy and Feetfirst to reflect the fact that they are operating in Quebec. LINK{FR}

Unfortunately for her, international law protects the intellectual property of company names and so her hands are somewhat tied. No doubt we will see another SECOND CUP imbroglio wherein the company was forced to add the word "Les cafés" before its name to satisfy the language hounds. How would I describe this state of affairs.....'very professional.'

The OQLF has found itself tongue-tied in the affair of SKI IN/SKI OUT  hotels a new type of lodging that allows skiers to, as you might have guessed it, ski right up to the door of their lodging. 
These type of hotels are sprouting up along the hills of many Quebec ski resorts and the appellation seems to have stuck.
As of yet their are no suggestions for French alternatives. LINK

Interviewed in a Quebec City newspaper Madame Marchand warned Quebeckers that it's their responsibility to protect the French language and as such, when speaking with anglos or ethnics, they should stick to speaking French only.... How 'very professional' of her!

I received an email from Steve asking what the annual budget of the OQLF is...
The answer..... a little more than $20 million.

Student complains about English course material

 "The case has not made much noise, but nevertheless reveals a disturbing trend. On February 4, in Le Devoir we learned that a student at the University of Montreal believed herself to be a victim of language discrimination. Enrolled in a Religious Studies, Marie-Noelle Smith had to retire from the very first course because 80% of reading material was in English. "Does it mean that higher education is accessible only to a bilingual elite in Quebec? "She asked anxiously.  
The Ombudsman of the university responded that French is fine, but it must first seek "the highest standards of quality ."  Le Devoir

French dictionary makes a stink

A Montreal Gazette writer humorously noted that a French dictionary was placed in the Foreign language section of a Montreal bookstore.
It was funny until Josee Legault, the Montreal Gazette resident separatist made a big deal about it and sent the story viral.
Always ready to find something to feed her persecution complex she played up the story as something significant instead of something just plain dumb.
Read Andy Riga's story

Anglos ask for English health services in Trois-Rivieres

The small but not insignificant anglo community of the Three-Rivers Trois-Rivieres region has been politely militating for English services in the health care field.
As of now no English services are available anywhere in the region and anglos say that being hospitalized without being able to communicate represents a hardship, especially to the elderly. Bilingual hospital employees are few and far between in the region. LINK

English cegep demand up again this year

Last year saw a 20% rise in the demand for places in Montreal area English cegeps. The increased demand put pressure on students to produce higher marks to earn entry and many were disappointed. The schools increased enrollment after securing a promise from the education department for increased funding.
To date, the money has not been paid and schools are facing another crisis as enrollment is up considerably again this year.

"Dawson College allowed 300 additional students, while John Abbott admitted an extra 175 students, and Vanier added 204.

But none of the schools has actually received any of the new money yet, and the long-term plans for the provincial funding are still up in the air.

Meanwhile, demand to register for the Quebec junior colleges increased for the third year in a row this year, with parents lining up Tuesday at CEGEPs like Dawson College in Montreal on the last day to register students for next fall.

Some CEGEPs have been forced to reject thousands of students in recent years because of an inability to accommodate the demand." LINK CBC news

Renowned Montreal lawyer warns of lawsuit if  Bill 101 applied to cegep

“If an eventual Parti Québécois government decides to extend Bill 101 to CEGEPs, a prominent Montreal lawyer predicts it would be quickly challenged in court.

“I would join in any challenge and I would perhaps personally challenge it, as well,” said Julius Grey.

“I consider academic freedom to be a fundamental issue. And I don’t think a society should play around with higher education and with restricting what people may do.” LINK

In an interview, ex-separatist Premier Lucien Bouchard advised against applying the English restrictions of Bill 101 to cegeps;

“I think we have reached a linguistic balance in Quebec. It's fragile, it's not a perfect balance. But at the risk of losing it, we must accept to live with it. ” LINK{FR}

Rural Anglophones a vanishing breed

“Quietly, without fanfare, English-speakers are disappearing from regions where the roots of both language communities run deep....”

“...150 years ago, the Eastern Townships had more English-speaking residents than Montreal, points out Ronald Rudin, a history professor at Concordia University who spoke at a conference there last week on the inclusion of anglophones in Quebec history. In 1861, anglophones formed one-quarter of the population in the Gaspe, 39 per cent in Quebec City and 64 per cent in the Ottawa Valley...”

Read an outstanding article by Marian Scott about Quebec's vanishing Anglo rural  population.

Rural anglophones a vanishing breed in Quebec

More blowback about grade 6 bilingualism

More progressive thinking on the subject;

"It isn't true that all humans can learn two languages perfectly. Only 10 to 20% can do so without it interfering with their culture. The rest learn their own language poorly or the other imposed language. That's time and money lost.
Everybody says, even today, after 150 years of public education, 35% of people are illiterate to the point of being unable to cope ... and 30% of students are dropping out of high school ..

Where does this madness of trying to impose a second language come from? Speaking  English in Quebec is only required by about 15 to 20% of people. If Bill 101 was implemented, it would be even less.- Onil Perrier

"The teaching of English in the first year in Quebec schools would be a disaster," says French linguist Claude Hagege.

"In another language environment, the teaching of English in the first year would be questionable. But in Quebec, such a reform would have serious consequences with only six million francophones in a sea of 300 million anglophones. The natural evolution is  towards English. French may disappear at any time if English is not severely and strictly forbidden by law. "

"Quebec Francophones must stop believing that in the holy name of globalization, they can thrive and prosper by becoming bilingual. This is a dangerous slippery slope, the consequences will be disastrous for the survival and future of an entire people. React while there is still time!" 

Claude Verreault, Department of Languages, Linguistics and Translation
  University of Laval,

"As we saw in the case of bridging schools and as we see now, the decision to require all sixth graders to be subjected to half a year of intensive English, is the Liberal party dream to bilingualize Quebec from one horizon to another, regardless of need and cost." -Yves Rancourt

"No need to look at the numbers to understand that Quebecers are among the most bilingual in the world. Bilingualism is symptomatic of a language imbalance, it is the first phase of a process by which a foreign language is to supplant a local language. Bilingualism in Quebec is one way: Francophones in Montreal or Gatineau speak English to be understood by English speakers, who have no need at all to learn French to be understood. That's the magic of bilingualism." -Daniel Sénéchal

Only in Quebec is a STOP sign a Language Issue.

I thought that the once simmering "STOP sign" controversy was long over, until reading some recent posts on French language militant websites where it appears that the subject has reared its ugly head once again.

You'd think that with the province drowning in debt, the health care system on the verge of a collapse, the dropout rate among francophone teens an utter disgrace, one wouldn't have the time or energy to debate such a mundane subject as STOP signs, but such is not the case.

This is Quebec.

In another century, this cartoon by Montreal Gazette cartoonist Aislin, said it all, the sad pettiness and vindictiveness that characterized the issue.

When the Parti Quebecois first came to power, it became public policy to sanitize all road signs and slowly over the years, English slowly disappeared from road signs across the province, in all but a few officially bilingual towns.

And so Quebec's distinctive and beloved bilingual STOP/ARRÊT sign went the way of the dinosaur, replaced by the unilingual ARRÊT.

The inconvenient fact that the word 'ARRÊT' is not really proper French to describe the act of coming to a stop at an intersection was of no matter. The word ARRÊT' can be best used to describe a stop as in a "Bus Stop" In fact the proper French word for coming to a halt at an intersection is.......wait for it.....STOP or STOPPEZ.

In France 'STOP' is what is written on their stop signs, believe it or not.

In fact most countries in the world, especially in Europe, employ STOP and nothing else on their signs.  For an interesting picture gallery go here.

That being said and Quebec being what it is, the idea of 'STOP' on signs no longer sat right and so the grammatically incorrect ARRÊT was decreed politically correct.

Last summer, I filed what I thought was an amusing post about Stop signs for further reference, believing it to be an atypical rant, something that perhaps didn't deserve to be critiqued on its own.

But last week another Stop sign complainer graced the pages of another militant French language website, so I decided to take a closer look at the complainers, where sadly I found, a particular twisted state of mind, one that still exists in Quebec, to what extent, I cannot really say.

 In Dorval near the Airport

If you live in the greater Montreal area, you may have noticed these last years that "STOP" signs have slowly begun replacing the now familiar ARRÊT or ARRÊT/STOP signs.

Apparently the powers that be, have now decided that Quebec has matured to the point where STOP can be employed alone, rehabilitated like a political prisoner who spent a decade in the Gulag.

But of course this doesn't sit well with some language militants who are outraged that such an affront to the French language is going unchallenged and so they have taken up the good fight to keep French pure and to police words like STOP from entering the common French lexicon.

You'll remember that during the francization campaign to remove English from road signs, the common ARRÊT/STOP sign was particularly galling to French militants because it reflected a bilingual society, nothing less than an anathema to them. And so the innocent STOP/ARRÊT sign was treated to a cruel onslaught of vandalization.

Here's an interesting exchange on the Mouvement Montréal français website LINK

I'm surprised that nobody is talking about it, but have you noticed that the city of Granby has retained its stop signs that say: "Stop" while the rest of the province, we see "ARRÊT". Is this city exempt from the Bill 101?.... 

....I can't accept to live in English in Granby while the rest of the province lives in French"

"I spoke with Mr. André Jean, Public Works of the City of Granby, today and he replied that the word "Stop"is legal and comes from Old French (?) that the word is in the French dictionary and that the word is accepted OQLF and MTQ. It is the word "ARRÊT" that is not the correct French term and the government accepts these signs since 1978. They are accepted by the road signs manual of Quebec accepted as well as everywhere in the world, even in Germany, he told me. I asked him for a copy of the report and  will check it out...."

"The word 'STOP' is French and has been for a hundred years! I agree that the word STOP on a sign gives the impression of English monolingualism. On the other hand the word ARRÊT is less acceptable because in general French, this term refers to a bus stop! I do not understand why our signs don't display 'ARRÊTEZ' or something similar in Quebec. Can someone give me an opinion on this?

Hmmm. a whole big discussion. Here is another reader exclaiming outrage last week in another post vigile.net

"The real significance of these 'Stop' signs is that it is an act of defiance towards Quebec. In Quebec the stop signs that say 'ARRÊT' are a symbol of the survival of French in North America. Remember that Quebec is the only "state" in the Francophone world that writes ARRÊT on its signs. This is a legitimate way to tell the world that we exist. These signs are somehow inscribed in the cultural heritage of Quebec.
Westmount with STOP signs reject Quebec, flouting Bill 101, ignoring the minority, helping to create and maintain the two solitudes in Montreal." LINK

Can you believe all of this over stop signs?
Incidentally, this writer of the above post must never have been west of Decarie Boulevard in Montreal. Had he visited Hampstead, Côte St. Luc and practically every other west island community, he'd have found the same STOP signs widely in use.

Incidentally, a public works employee told me one of the reasons for using the 'STOP' sign is because they are cheaper and available in bulk from suppliers across North America. Hmm....

The stop sign debate even crosses over to the native communities in Quebec where natives, like all  Quebeckers, are divided along linguistic lines.

Stop signs on reservations reflect this French/English divide wherein  bands that speak English display bilingual stop signs with English while those bands that speak French display bilingual stop signs with French.
Some signs are even tri-lingual.

At any rate I don't think the OQLF or Transports Quebec will have much influence on what the natives display on their resevations!

My least favourite Stop sign is one that remains in the parking garage of the Westmount Square parking complex. Not only is it insulting, but completely stupid, no doubt the product of a nincompoop employee making a bad decision.

On the other hand my favourite stop sign is this one that appeared last Spring as the Canadiens were making a heroic playoff run.


Ah, Quebec! always interesting.

French language Militants Organizing to Fight Grade Six Bilingualism

One of Quebec's dirtiest little secrets is that the powers that be, the entrenched educators, most politicians, the unions and the civil service, all share a unique view of Quebec as a unilingual country/province, where English should be discouraged rather than promoted.

This of course doesn't jive with what the general public wants, a province which is French, but where every child is taught to speak English as a matter of public policy.

In a battle of wills, it's not hard to predict that it will be the powerful and entrenched, French-only militants who will prevail in imposing their view of a unilingual Quebec on the powerless public.

Premier Charest's pronouncement that sixth grade school children will be treated to half a school year of English immersion sent sub-surface shock waves throughout the intelligentsia who view this possibility as a dangerous development, a project to be nipped in the bud as soon as possible.

The reality is that the Premier's promise of English immersion is another pipe dream, similar to the promise he made during the last election campaign that we could expect reduced wait times in emergency rooms.
Both are lofty ideals, but unfortunately neither is attainable in present day Quebec.

And so six years after the Liberals took power with the promise of improving wait time in the emergency room, Quebec has sunk to last place in North America, where it takes an average of  1026 minutes or about 17 hours to be treated, wherein the average in the United States is 240 minutes. LINK

Better to move the public debate to a new and different unattainable promise than to mire in the failure  of the past.

For the powers that be, keeping Quebec unilingual is viewed as a necessary evil that protects and maintains the French language and Quebec's unique culture. The present day policy of functional unilingualism acts as the  'FRENCH CURTAIN' that envelopes Quebec's borders and keeps citizens from exercising free movement due to their inability to communicate with the outside world.

Author Christian Dufour, sums up neatly the pathological fear that many Francophone intellectuals share;

"If all Quebeckers become very bilingual, they will buy more records, newspapers and books in English. It will create a decline in interest for our cultural products, already heavily subsidized. ...
"It's a a regression of identity, It means that those who do not speak English are not functional, as if being French no longer sufficed, that English was a necessity to exist. LINK

In a letter to the editor a reader, dead set against the teaching of English summons the same hackneyed excuses that are the hallmark of bilingualism foes.

" Although I think the teaching of English should be improved in Quebec, I disagree with the government's plan mandating the exclusive learning of English for half of the 6th year, compressing all other academic subjects in the other half. Where will we find the specialist teachers who will be needed? Teachers are already in an impossible situation, that is, to integrate students with learning disabilities in regular classes. Now we want every child, whatever his strengths and weaknesses, to become bilingual while assimilating a school year in 5 months"

And so support for the existing FRENCH CURTAIN of ignorance remains strong and like the IRON CURTAIN of the communist era, it may be cynical and cruel, but undeniably effective. Francophone Quebeckers are the least mobile of all Canadians and are culturally and linguistically dependent on the province, like an infant attached to its mother's breast, a pleasing state of affairs to militants.

Take for example the exodus of newly-minted anglophone doctors who are exiting the province at a rate of about 50% due to the gross iniquity in remuneration and working conditions as compared to any other place in North America. Yet francophone colleagues remain steadfastly at home, tied to the province through the language and cultural handicap.

For language militants and separatists, this represents a happy state of affairs, not something to be trifled with at all.

And so unless you are a unionized government employee (including government corporation like Hydro-Quebec)  or a unionized construction worker, working in French in Quebec means working for less money. The lack of worker mobility because language is the number one factor.
It's no different than the bygone practice of controlling women by keeping them "barefoot and pregnant," a cynical device to keep women in their place.

Nobody can deny the effect of Bill 101 in transforming Quebec from a bilingual to French only society. The higher echelons of elected government, the bureaucracy, state controlled business have all eliminated English completely from daily affairs.
Years ago politicians, even separatists were fluently bilingual, including René Levesque, Jacques Parizeau, Lucien Bouchard, Daniel Johnson, André Boisclair and even Bernard Landry.
Today's politicians, Liberals included, can hardly speak a whit of English and this includes Liberal cabinet ministers who sound like tourists reading out of a handbook when speaking English.

Unlike the citizens in the street, most of these leaders remain firmly planted in unilingual Quebec society and cannot really see the utility of English.

And so the backlash begins.

Of course the French radicals who populate the Société Saint-Jean-Baptiste, Mouvement Montréal français and the majority of readers and writers on vigile.net have no qualms about opposing this bilingualism initiative on principle, but they are of no import, they have zero power.

The meaningful push back will come from those who have the political power and will to sabotage the bilingualism project from the inside. These are the politicians, the school board officials, the teacher's union who will pronounce themselves firmly in favour of bilingualism...with an asterik.
They will cleverly support bilingualism publicly, but work to sink the implementation of any such project from the inside.

Yves Parenteau of the Teacher's Alliance;
"We already had trouble teaching all the content in the other subjects. The problem will worsen if we have to steal time from other disciplines in order to teach  English" LINK{FR}

There is really no political will to speak of in the French school system to teach English. While everybody pretends that it's a good idea, the entire system will fight to keep English out.

The teacher's union, which doesn't have members with the capacity to teach English will fight tooth and nail to keep Anglophone teachers from replacing unilingual francophone teachers and that's just a start.
The ideologues throughout the system, be it the Ministry of Education, the school commissions and the teachers themselves will work to frustrate any plan to further the teaching of English.

In the meantime a policy of misinformation, ignorance and misdirection towards the teaching of English continues unabated in the media

A recurring theme in many of those complaining about the proposed language training, is that it isn't fair that English students will not be subjected to the same intensive training in French. Here's a typical complaint{FR}

What an ignorant fool!

Most Francophones remain entirely ignorant of the efforts of the English community to teach French intensively to their children. Here in a letter to Le Devoir by Jean-Michel Brunet, a French teacher in an English school, sets the record straight LINK{FR}
By the way, as most parents can attest, this intense French language instruction doesn't turn the children into francophones, but rather, bilingual anglophones!
Intensive French instruction for English students has been in the curriculum of English schools for over thirty years, with French immersion and general language starting in kindergarten.

Gilles Proulx, the French blowhard radio and television personality, gratuitously claims that English high school students can't speak a word of French, a lie that only an ignorant fool would propagate.

French educational 'intellectuals' continue to weave the fiction that starting young children on second language instruction is dangerous and confusing, a concept that runs counter to what the rest of the world believes.
The myth that learning English turns Francophones into Englishmen is perhaps the most monstrous of all the distortions propagated, yet we hear it every day.

Look for this project to teach English intensively to die a death of a thousand cuts. While nobody will admit to it, there will be an insurmountable campaign to scuttle the plan because while educators agree that learning English is important, they aren't really in favour of it.

And so it remains that your typical francophone high school graduate cannot ask for the time of day in English and come to think of it, neither can their teachers.

Parents who seek English for their children will do what they need to do, outside of the system.  More kids learn English by playing video games and watching English television and movies than through the entire English training provided by the French educational system.

Francophones who learn English do so on their own, by their own ingenuity and effort, and they should be congratulated.

In acquiring English they never could count on the support of the French educational system and sadly, notwithstanding Mr. Charest's announcement, they never will.

Instead of looking to the English school boards as an example of how to properly teach a second language, the government is setting out on a program doomed to fail from the start. Every English parent who has sent their child to English school where French is taught intensely, knows that it takes years of training and that the earlier the exposure to a second language starts the better.

French language militants who want to keep franncophone Quebeckers unilingual, should applaud Mr. Charest's effort.
As the greatest English playwright said in Macbeth - it is a case of;
  'Sound and fury, signifying nothing"

Royals Protest by Quebec Miltitants a Crashing Bore

Once more the self-important, paper tigers of RRQ has threatened to disrupt a royal visit, this time that of Prince William and his soon to be wife Kate Middleton, this summer.

Read: Radical Quebec nationalists vow to give honeymooning royal couple a royal pain

The real question is -Who cares?

The Royals are no longer the symbol they once were, not in Britain, not in Canada and certainly not in Quebec.

Fifty-two years ago as a young lad, my mom dragged me off to greet young Queen Elizabeth, who was in the midst of the greatest Royal tour of Canada ever, a 45 day coast to coast visit that brought her to Montreal and a stop at the St. Justine Childrens Hospital on busy Cote St. Catherine Boulevard. The well-wishers were lined six-deep for kilometres in each direction and as her motorcade passed by ever so slowly, I was prompted to furiously wave my paper red ensign. Interestingly, the visit by young Queen Elizabeth went extremely well in Quebec, where she was actually praised in the press and referred to as 'sympathique' by the Montreal Matin newspaper.

Sounds a little ridiculous today.

Few of us care about the Royals, other than those predisposed to celebrity fan magazines, where one can live the glamorous life vicariously.

For many of us, the only time we pay any attention at all, is when a Royal marriage is melting down or when they act rather foolishly in public and then with a cruel sense of schadenfreude, we take perverse delight in the very public humiliation.
There are very few of us left who view the Royals as some sort of dashing symbol of British imperial power or alternately, depending on one's point of view, as a vile representation of colonialist power.
They are in reality just not that important.

Canada's relationship with the monarchy continues to fade and truthfully, we maintain the tradition more out of politeness than anything else.
Like our membership in the Commonwealth of Nations (which has officially dropped the "British Commonwealth' moniker) we can ask ourselves why on Earth we remain a member.
Membership in that organization has us rubbing elbows with tin pot dictatorships and countries that routinely advocate killing  homosexuals (Uganda). The Commonwealth Games is a celebration of also-rans that is embarrassingly un-competitive. The last edition in India was an a utter flop and a considerable humiliation for the host, unable to cope with the complication of holding an international event of that magnitude.

To Canada, the monarchy and the Commonwealth are the past, a historical reminder of the way things were.

So what is it about the royal visit that has the RRQ so annoyed, other than the fact that each Canadian taxpayer (Quebeckers included,) contributes about a buck-fifty each per year for their upkeep. Hardly something to riot over, I'd imagine.
Even the radical Jeunes Patriotes du Quebec said that the royal visit was a non-issue for them.

The RRQ is a sad little collection of coffee house revolutionaries, too chickenshit to cause any real damage and this by their own admission. The fact that they have promised to keep things civilized makes them about as interesting as a bunch of civil servants conducting a protest march over job security.

Its hard for the organization to muster 100 people and so with a little forethought and planning the police could easily deflect any inconvenience the group hopes to achieve.

By picking a large venue, outdoors on Mont Royal or in the old Port, for example, with more than one entrance and exit, the effectiveness of the small demonstration could be neutralized.
Last time the police played right into the demonstrators hands by failing to block off two streets leading to the armoury where Prince Charles and Camilla visited. Ten cops, and correctly placed barricades was all it should have required but alas, the Montreal police are not known for stellar crowd control.

In the old days of the FLQ, Quebec revolutionaries sat in taverns, smoked Gitanes and drank from large brown bottles of Molson. Today our pseudo-revolutionaries sit in Van Houtte drinking $5 Lattes and munching on croissants.
The RRQ are a harmless set of twits, who huff and puff. They should be ignored.

While on the subject of pseudo-revolutionaries, a small article in the news caught my attention.
Do you remember our good friend Jean-Roch Villemaire who was convicted of crimes related to vandalization of anglophone candidates political signs because they were in English?

Read my post; Quebec Radical Admits to Crime, Then Pleads Innocent

Well after lying low after his conviciton, he re-emerged as the head of the Mouvement Nationaliste Révolutionnaire Québécois (MNRQ) a neo-fascist movement, which proposes the elimination of English from Quebec as well as an end to immigration. Thrown in for good measure is a heaping helping of anti-Zionism.

Recently his announcement that his organization would participate in the boycott of Le Marcheur freaked out the PAJU, who didn't want to be seen allied with the right-wing supremacist organization.
They issued this press release which referred to MNRQ as Nazis, and called a temporary halt to the boycott. LINK

Following virulent denunciations in the press, including that of Francoise David of Quebec solidaire, Mr. Villemaire announced that he was tired of being vilified and misjudged. In a final statement before shuttering the organization the MNRQ announced.

"We can draw the necessary conclusions from this adventure. The forces of status quo are powerful. The demonization campaign orchestrated by the Zionist lobby towards Jean-Roch Villemaire and MNRQ has unfortunately been victorious. We lost a battle but we have not lost the war! "

Good to his word, the website has been shut down and hopefully Mr. Villemaire will fade to black.
He was a dangerous little fellow.

Not so the RRQ, a harmless group of wannabee revolutionaries who are about as popular as they are dangerous. They are actually amusing casting their empty threats with mock indignation. Perhaps when they are finished with the Royals they can launch a protest against the Catholic Church, the Equality Party and other irrelevant and spent forces.

By the way, when they do protest the Prince's visit, I hope they will improve on the poor syntax displayed on the protest placards (see above) they brandished last time. Maybe they should hire someone who could advise them on the proper use of English!