“Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.” -Oscar Wilde.
Monday, October 5, 2009
Earl Jones to Take a Plea
Victims of Earl Jones will be disappointed that they won't get to see the fraudster face his accusers in a court of law.
Negotiations are underway for a plea agreement between Jeffrey Boro, Jones' lawyer (shown on the far left in the photo) and crown prosecutors.
The crown is demanding a sentence of 12 years while Jones' lawyers are holding out for 10 years.
At any rate, the broken and fragile Jones is in no condition and has no intention to suffer the humiliation of a full-fledged trial which would ultimately result in his conviction anyway.
Although Jones is supposedly broke, his legal fees are being paid, purportedly by "family" members.
It's important to note, that even at the higher term of twelve years, Jones will be eligible for parole in just twenty-four months.
Those who are holding out even the fainest hope that some money can be recovered, should move on- there's nothing there, according to those who know.
Friday, October 2, 2009
French vs. English Volume 4
Traffic Tickets
A letter writer named Pierre from Notre-Dame-de-l'ile-Perrot wrote a piece on imperatif-francais.org, an article entitled "Complaint against the City of Montreal "Plainte contre la Ville de Montréal" where he fulminates against bilingual traffic tickets.
4,000 kilometers away in Alberta another issue concerning a traffic ticket has been raised. It seems that an Alberta judge has ruled that a ticket issued to one Gilles Caron, a francophone trucker, wasn't valid because it wasn't printed in French as well as in English. That case is headed to the Supreme Court.
Twenty years ago Manitoba was forced to translate everything into French and operate bilingually. It remains to be seen what happens in Alberta.
While a bilingual ticket makes an Alberta francophone happy, a bilingual ticket makes a Quebec francophone very unhappy! I guess it's just a matter of perspective!.....
OQLF Inspector given a rough ride
It's only surprising that it took so long to happen.
An inspector from the Office québécois de la langue française (the government agency that enforces Quebec's language laws) has had a charge laid against a Gatineau businessman for assault. Michel Bond is accused of physically removing the inspector from his place of business and then slamming a car door on the unfortunate doofus.
Not to worry, these inspectors are tough SOBs and they're used to taking abuse. Everywhere they go, they're greeted with various degrees of disdain which range from mild annoyance to overt hostility. Anyone who stays in the job has a thick skin.
A decade ago the predominantly English town of Shawville got a posse together and literally ran an inspector right out of town!
Magog supermarket commits a High Crime and Misdamenour
A Loblaws supermarket in the Eastern Townships was attacked for having the audacity to play bilingual announcements over it's public address system.
The ever vigilant organization, the Mouvement estrien pour le français, defender of the French language in the Townships region, complained to the government watchdog department, the l'Office québécois de la langue française over the bilingual ads.
Their demand is based on the language law requirement that French be 'predominant' in public advertising.
The watchdog group suggested that the store play twice as many French ads as English ones to satisfy the requirements of the law.
Store management is mulling over their options, but there seems to be no truth to the rumor that in order to conform to the law, the store is considering playing the French ads twice as loud as the English ones....
Nationalists want new street name
Nationalists have been making a big stink lately about the street named after Jeffrey AMHERST demanding that the name be changed because he was a racist, who condoned exterminating the local Indians.
This week the suggestion has been made that the street be re-baptized to honour another racist, but this one a francophone, Pierre Falardeau who died last week. He was without a doubt the most vocal Anglo hater in Quebec, an overt racist who invited Anglos to move out of Quebec.
Montreal has always recognized important personalities on both sides of the language issue, the best example being the back to back streets named after the opposing commanders in the Battle of the Plains of Abraham, Wolfe and Montcalm (which ironically are streets adjacent to Amherst). In that spirit of openness, I propose that Robin street be re-baptized to honour of one of Quebec's greatest writers, the controversial Mordecai Richler, whose notoriety shouldn't be given any more weight then that attached to Falardeau!-
A letter writer named Pierre from Notre-Dame-de-l'ile-Perrot wrote a piece on imperatif-francais.org, an article entitled "Complaint against the City of Montreal "Plainte contre la Ville de Montréal" where he fulminates against bilingual traffic tickets.
"Here ladies and gentlemen of the OQLF is a complaint against the city of Montreal and the Government of Québec. The document annexed speaks for itself. It is written in English. Oh yes, there's also a French version." But my complaint is that there is an English version at all.He goes on to rant that by offering English versions of documents, the government encourages immigrants to function without having to learn French. Hmmmm....
4,000 kilometers away in Alberta another issue concerning a traffic ticket has been raised. It seems that an Alberta judge has ruled that a ticket issued to one Gilles Caron, a francophone trucker, wasn't valid because it wasn't printed in French as well as in English. That case is headed to the Supreme Court.
Twenty years ago Manitoba was forced to translate everything into French and operate bilingually. It remains to be seen what happens in Alberta.
While a bilingual ticket makes an Alberta francophone happy, a bilingual ticket makes a Quebec francophone very unhappy! I guess it's just a matter of perspective!.....
OQLF Inspector given a rough ride
It's only surprising that it took so long to happen.
An inspector from the Office québécois de la langue française (the government agency that enforces Quebec's language laws) has had a charge laid against a Gatineau businessman for assault. Michel Bond is accused of physically removing the inspector from his place of business and then slamming a car door on the unfortunate doofus.
Not to worry, these inspectors are tough SOBs and they're used to taking abuse. Everywhere they go, they're greeted with various degrees of disdain which range from mild annoyance to overt hostility. Anyone who stays in the job has a thick skin.
A decade ago the predominantly English town of Shawville got a posse together and literally ran an inspector right out of town!
Magog supermarket commits a High Crime and Misdamenour
A Loblaws supermarket in the Eastern Townships was attacked for having the audacity to play bilingual announcements over it's public address system.
The ever vigilant organization, the Mouvement estrien pour le français, defender of the French language in the Townships region, complained to the government watchdog department, the l'Office québécois de la langue française over the bilingual ads.
Their demand is based on the language law requirement that French be 'predominant' in public advertising.
The watchdog group suggested that the store play twice as many French ads as English ones to satisfy the requirements of the law.
Store management is mulling over their options, but there seems to be no truth to the rumor that in order to conform to the law, the store is considering playing the French ads twice as loud as the English ones....
Nationalists want new street name
Nationalists have been making a big stink lately about the street named after Jeffrey AMHERST demanding that the name be changed because he was a racist, who condoned exterminating the local Indians.
This week the suggestion has been made that the street be re-baptized to honour another racist, but this one a francophone, Pierre Falardeau who died last week. He was without a doubt the most vocal Anglo hater in Quebec, an overt racist who invited Anglos to move out of Quebec.
Montreal has always recognized important personalities on both sides of the language issue, the best example being the back to back streets named after the opposing commanders in the Battle of the Plains of Abraham, Wolfe and Montcalm (which ironically are streets adjacent to Amherst). In that spirit of openness, I propose that Robin street be re-baptized to honour of one of Quebec's greatest writers, the controversial Mordecai Richler, whose notoriety shouldn't be given any more weight then that attached to Falardeau!-
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Payback's a Bitch For Bloc Quebecois
Stephen Harper is set to deal the Bloc Québécois a devastating blow, one that may re-shape Parliament and break the cycle of minority governments. Gilles Duceppe and the rest of Quebec nationalists are furious at Harper's gambit to change the dynamics of the House of Commons by adding additional Parliamentary seats in English Canada, while freezing the number of MPs that Quebec sends to Ottawa.
Last Friday's Globe and Mail ran a detailed story on the long overdue electoral reform;
Public Works Minister Christian Paradis painted the project in much simpler terms, conveniently omitting the political benefits to the Conservatives.
Opinion polls show that the Bloc continues to maintain a stranglehold over the bulk of Quebec Parliamentary seats. The Liberals resigned to the fact that they are not going to achieve any breakthrough in the next election and will have to content themselves with holding the traditional Anglo seats around Montreal, which remain unassailable regardless of whether the party supports the proposed legislation or or not.
And so it's a question of numbers, the proposed 41 seats will be added to the suburban areas of Toronto, Vancouver, Edmonton and Calgary and as things stack up, the seats look to split evenly between Conservatives and Liberals. The biggest losers, of course, will be the Bloc and the NDP and turning the federal campaign into a two horse race is as appealing to the Liberals as it is to the Conservatives.
For Gilles Duceppe the attempt to marginalize him, his party and Quebec is as dangerous a scenario as it can get. The realization that he hasn't got many cards to play is all the more galling. Ergo his rage.
His amateurish threat, that those parties that support the bill, will be punished in Quebec come election day is hollow, the damage is minimal and has already been factored in by his foes.
Interestingly, if Mr Duceppe's analysis is right, his party stands to win even more Quebec seats, so it seems a bit disingenuous of him to argue against a bill that will reap him so many benefits. It's more likely that he understands that even with more seats, he'll have less power.
The Bloc, unable to argue against the proposed legislation based on democratic principles is forced to resort to the old chestnut of 'fairness'.
The 'fairness' that he's taking about, is the fairness wherein Quebec gets more out of Canada than it puts in.
It's the 'fairness' that guarantees Quebec one-third of the seats on the Supreme Court, with just 22% of the population.
It's the fairness wherein Francophones hold a disproportionate amount of federal civil service jobs, especially in senior positions where bilingualism is a requirement.
It's the 'fairness' wherein Quebec pays less in taxes and takes out more in services.
It's the 'fairness' wherein Quebec can demand more Parliamentary seats then their numbers warrant.
It's that type of 'fairness' that enrages Canadians.
Mr. Duceppe makes the argument for this disproportionism with a straight face and moral indignation, after all he's used to the old Quebec counting formula - '"Two for me, one for you."
Lost in the debate is the fact that while Canada is growing, Quebec is barely maintaining it's numbers with projections that within twenty years, the province's population will actually decline.
The majority of the proposed ridings are in areas of the countrt that are teeming with new Canadians, who are largely responsible for the population explosion in the suburbs of the big Canadian cities.
Perhaps the next time Quebec politicians, editorialists and pamphleteers rail on about how the immigrants are diluting the gene pool, they could examine the impact of a diminished birth rate on the future population of the province.
Either Quebec comes to terms with the fact that it cannot maintain itself as a white, Christian society where everyone is born speaking French, or they will lose more Parliamentary seats in the future as the province's population shrinks. The rest of Canada has already embraced the reality of the twenty-first century, Quebec could well be left behind.
The furious denunciations over the new seat proposal coming out of Quebec are rather delicious to hear. The usual smug face of Duceppe is now tortured and bewildered.
There hasn't been this much indignation in Quebec since the "Night of the Long Knives' back in 1982 when the nine provincial Premiers and Pierre Elliot Trudeau agreed to repatriate the Canadian Constitution behind Rene Levesque's back while he slept obliviously in his hotel room in Hull.
For Duceppe, its a perdre/perdre situation.
The more he complains about Quebec getting screwed, the happier most Canadians will be and the harder their position will become. Canadians have been waiting a long time to get revenge on the Bloc, a party which they perceive as making a mockery of the political process and they will perceive this as the perfect opportunity.
Payback's a bitch!
Mr. Duceppe and his party have always claimed to be in Ottawa to defend the 'interests' of Quebecers. His failure on this issue, after promising that his party will fight tooth and nail to stop the legislation, is going to be problematic. When Quebecers realize that when push comes to shove, the Bloc Quebecois is unable to do anything concrete in defence of Quebec, they are going to be forced to re-evaluate their situation. Voices from the right in Quebec, will howl in derision at Mr. Duceppe's and his party's failure.
If a majority government can be achieved without Quebec, it will mean the end of the Bloc Quebecois as a force.
Quebecers will never give up completely on the Bloc, there are too many separatists who would rather vote for a shoe than a Federalist party, no matter how self-defeating. They'll continue to vote for the Bloc as an affirmation of their separatist faith.
There are Quebec nationalists who will threaten that any attempt to reduce Quebec's power will lead to a rise in the separatist mood of Quebec.
Those who make this argument are sadly out of touch with the mood of the rest of Canada. Most Canadians are over Quebec's tantrums and are impervious to threats. The prevailing attitude is 'Take it or leave it.'
There is another alternative, one that is more likely to happen. Nothing.
Quebecers have notoriously short memories. Last spring Premier Charest was considered toast by experts because of his cynical handling of the fiasco at the Caisse de Depot when he hid the financial disaster until he could be re-elected. Today he's back atop the polls.
It's at least three years until the next provincial election and by then the issue will have been all but forgotten, the only lasting effect being the diminished seat count and the diminished influence of Quebec in Ottawa.
Last Friday's Globe and Mail ran a detailed story on the long overdue electoral reform;
"Democratic Reform Minister Steven Fletcher is in the advanced stages of preparing legislation that would reshape the House of Commons, adding dozens of seats to the three fast-growing provinces that are now seriously underrepresented." Globe and MailThe move to redress the serious imbalance in the distribution of seats in the House of Commons signals that Harper has given up on Quebec and has come to believe that the only way to achieve a majority government is to marginalize Quebec.
Public Works Minister Christian Paradis painted the project in much simpler terms, conveniently omitting the political benefits to the Conservatives.
"It's a democratic principle that there must be a basic element of proportionally and presently it's disproportionate."The calculatingly cool Harper is counting on the Liberals to support his legislative knifing because he estimates that Mr. Ignatieff and the Liberals have as much to gain as he.
Opinion polls show that the Bloc continues to maintain a stranglehold over the bulk of Quebec Parliamentary seats. The Liberals resigned to the fact that they are not going to achieve any breakthrough in the next election and will have to content themselves with holding the traditional Anglo seats around Montreal, which remain unassailable regardless of whether the party supports the proposed legislation or or not.
And so it's a question of numbers, the proposed 41 seats will be added to the suburban areas of Toronto, Vancouver, Edmonton and Calgary and as things stack up, the seats look to split evenly between Conservatives and Liberals. The biggest losers, of course, will be the Bloc and the NDP and turning the federal campaign into a two horse race is as appealing to the Liberals as it is to the Conservatives.
For Gilles Duceppe the attempt to marginalize him, his party and Quebec is as dangerous a scenario as it can get. The realization that he hasn't got many cards to play is all the more galling. Ergo his rage.
His amateurish threat, that those parties that support the bill, will be punished in Quebec come election day is hollow, the damage is minimal and has already been factored in by his foes.
Interestingly, if Mr Duceppe's analysis is right, his party stands to win even more Quebec seats, so it seems a bit disingenuous of him to argue against a bill that will reap him so many benefits. It's more likely that he understands that even with more seats, he'll have less power.
The Bloc, unable to argue against the proposed legislation based on democratic principles is forced to resort to the old chestnut of 'fairness'.
The 'fairness' that he's taking about, is the fairness wherein Quebec gets more out of Canada than it puts in.
It's the 'fairness' that guarantees Quebec one-third of the seats on the Supreme Court, with just 22% of the population.
It's the fairness wherein Francophones hold a disproportionate amount of federal civil service jobs, especially in senior positions where bilingualism is a requirement.
It's the 'fairness' wherein Quebec pays less in taxes and takes out more in services.
It's the 'fairness' wherein Quebec can demand more Parliamentary seats then their numbers warrant.
It's that type of 'fairness' that enrages Canadians.
Mr. Duceppe makes the argument for this disproportionism with a straight face and moral indignation, after all he's used to the old Quebec counting formula - '"Two for me, one for you."
Lost in the debate is the fact that while Canada is growing, Quebec is barely maintaining it's numbers with projections that within twenty years, the province's population will actually decline.
The majority of the proposed ridings are in areas of the countrt that are teeming with new Canadians, who are largely responsible for the population explosion in the suburbs of the big Canadian cities.
Perhaps the next time Quebec politicians, editorialists and pamphleteers rail on about how the immigrants are diluting the gene pool, they could examine the impact of a diminished birth rate on the future population of the province.
Either Quebec comes to terms with the fact that it cannot maintain itself as a white, Christian society where everyone is born speaking French, or they will lose more Parliamentary seats in the future as the province's population shrinks. The rest of Canada has already embraced the reality of the twenty-first century, Quebec could well be left behind.
The furious denunciations over the new seat proposal coming out of Quebec are rather delicious to hear. The usual smug face of Duceppe is now tortured and bewildered.
There hasn't been this much indignation in Quebec since the "Night of the Long Knives' back in 1982 when the nine provincial Premiers and Pierre Elliot Trudeau agreed to repatriate the Canadian Constitution behind Rene Levesque's back while he slept obliviously in his hotel room in Hull.
For Duceppe, its a perdre/perdre situation.
The more he complains about Quebec getting screwed, the happier most Canadians will be and the harder their position will become. Canadians have been waiting a long time to get revenge on the Bloc, a party which they perceive as making a mockery of the political process and they will perceive this as the perfect opportunity.
Payback's a bitch!
Mr. Duceppe and his party have always claimed to be in Ottawa to defend the 'interests' of Quebecers. His failure on this issue, after promising that his party will fight tooth and nail to stop the legislation, is going to be problematic. When Quebecers realize that when push comes to shove, the Bloc Quebecois is unable to do anything concrete in defence of Quebec, they are going to be forced to re-evaluate their situation. Voices from the right in Quebec, will howl in derision at Mr. Duceppe's and his party's failure.
If a majority government can be achieved without Quebec, it will mean the end of the Bloc Quebecois as a force.
Quebecers will never give up completely on the Bloc, there are too many separatists who would rather vote for a shoe than a Federalist party, no matter how self-defeating. They'll continue to vote for the Bloc as an affirmation of their separatist faith.
There are Quebec nationalists who will threaten that any attempt to reduce Quebec's power will lead to a rise in the separatist mood of Quebec.
Those who make this argument are sadly out of touch with the mood of the rest of Canada. Most Canadians are over Quebec's tantrums and are impervious to threats. The prevailing attitude is 'Take it or leave it.'
There is another alternative, one that is more likely to happen. Nothing.
Quebecers have notoriously short memories. Last spring Premier Charest was considered toast by experts because of his cynical handling of the fiasco at the Caisse de Depot when he hid the financial disaster until he could be re-elected. Today he's back atop the polls.
It's at least three years until the next provincial election and by then the issue will have been all but forgotten, the only lasting effect being the diminished seat count and the diminished influence of Quebec in Ottawa.
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Getting Religion Out of Taxis
A Montreal cabbie is taking the government to court because he has been fined for displaying Jewish religious articles in his car. The taxi bureau maintains that the car is a 'public' space and as such should be free of religious references. An article in the Globe and Mail was generally sympathetic to the cabby's position;
It's positions like this, that have led the organization to lose it's credibility, even amongst many Jews.
Should a taxi driver be allowed to post pictures of his family, affix a crucifix or a rosary, place images of the Virgin Mary or perhaps hang a voodoo doll from the rear view mirror?
Some of you would agree, most would not.
Should Hare Krishna taxi drivers be allowed to burn incense in the car?
Should drivers be allowed to play loud rock music or worse still, howling religious or ethnic music?
Most would agree that incense and loud music cross the line, but why is an assault on the nose and on the ears worse than an assault on the eyes?
Where do we draw the line?
Me, the only picture I want to see in a cab is the mugshot in the taxi license.
I'm not that interested in being in a synagogue, mosque or church or being exposed to family photos. I don't want to see pictures of the Ayatollah, the Virgin Mary or the Lubavitcher Rebbe. I'd also appreciate if the cab was clean and that the cabby drove safely and that he didn't talk on a cell phone or eat lunch during the trip.
How about that!!! Maybe cabbies would earn more if they treated customers better. It's a novel concept.
Mr. Perecowicz says that in 40 odd years nobody got out of his cab because they were offended.
That doesn't mean that his garish display of personal memorabilia is appreciated. I don't think I'd like to see a personalized display of personal items at the license bureau, the post office or at the bank. It's a matter of respect for clients, something that cabbies rarely display.
It is galling to see the Quebec Jewish Congress supporting Mr. Perecowicz's position. Do they really argue that more religious paraphernalia should be encouraged in public spaces?
Jews and other religious minorities have long complained about the dominance of Christian symbolism in public places.
Should we have more?
Mr. Perecowicz says he's not especially religious, but he's comforted by having articles of his Jewish faith in the car, including photos of the late Lubovoitcher spiritual leader and two mezuzahs affixed to the car frame between the front and back doors. (A mezuzah, typically affixed to doorframes of Jewish homes, is a tiny prayer parchment that, according to Jewish beliefs, offers protection.) Globe & Mail.Of course the Quebec Jewish Congress, always quick to see discrimination in any situation, is lending him moral support in his quest to assert religious freedom in taxis.
It's positions like this, that have led the organization to lose it's credibility, even amongst many Jews.
Should a taxi driver be allowed to post pictures of his family, affix a crucifix or a rosary, place images of the Virgin Mary or perhaps hang a voodoo doll from the rear view mirror?
Some of you would agree, most would not.
Should Hare Krishna taxi drivers be allowed to burn incense in the car?
Should drivers be allowed to play loud rock music or worse still, howling religious or ethnic music?
Most would agree that incense and loud music cross the line, but why is an assault on the nose and on the ears worse than an assault on the eyes?
Where do we draw the line?
Me, the only picture I want to see in a cab is the mugshot in the taxi license.
I'm not that interested in being in a synagogue, mosque or church or being exposed to family photos. I don't want to see pictures of the Ayatollah, the Virgin Mary or the Lubavitcher Rebbe. I'd also appreciate if the cab was clean and that the cabby drove safely and that he didn't talk on a cell phone or eat lunch during the trip.
How about that!!! Maybe cabbies would earn more if they treated customers better. It's a novel concept.
Mr. Perecowicz says that in 40 odd years nobody got out of his cab because they were offended.
That doesn't mean that his garish display of personal memorabilia is appreciated. I don't think I'd like to see a personalized display of personal items at the license bureau, the post office or at the bank. It's a matter of respect for clients, something that cabbies rarely display.
It is galling to see the Quebec Jewish Congress supporting Mr. Perecowicz's position. Do they really argue that more religious paraphernalia should be encouraged in public spaces?
Jews and other religious minorities have long complained about the dominance of Christian symbolism in public places.
Should we have more?
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Quebec's Most Vocal Anglophobe Dies
Sorry I can't shed any tears over the death of Quebec's biggest Anglo hater, Pierre Falardeau.
A cruel and miserable soul, Pierre Falardeau was famous for urging Anglophone federalists to get out of Quebec.
He is also infamous for writing a particularly nasty article celebrating the death of noted Quebec federalist Claude Ryan.
Here's a clip of him denigrating Anglos.
As for his racist comments, apologists chalk it up to sovereignist exuberance and compare him to a lovable old uncle who likes to use the word 'nigger.'
As Quebec television personality Guy A. Lepage put it ;
Mr. Falardeau may have hated Canada, but had no problem accepting money from Telefilm Canada to finance his projects. When asked about the contradiction, in a television interview, he answered sheepishly that he "had three mouths to feed."
The animator then reminded him that he had previously chastised Francophone artists for taking part in Canada Day Celebrations. "Don't they also have families to feed?"
"You might be right..." answered Falardeau.
A deep thinker, this one.....
As they say in French - Bon Débarras!, good riddance.
A cruel and miserable soul, Pierre Falardeau was famous for urging Anglophone federalists to get out of Quebec.
He is also infamous for writing a particularly nasty article celebrating the death of noted Quebec federalist Claude Ryan.
"Finally, at last a good thing has happened! Claude Ryan has just died. Nothing left to do but to embalm him and close the coffin."Some other of his bon mots include a reference to David Suzuki; “a bearded little Jap.”
"Voilà enfin une bonne chose de faite! Claude Ryan vient de mourir. Ne reste plus qu'à l'embaumer et à fermer le couvercle." Pierre Faladeau
Here's a clip of him denigrating Anglos.
Of course the nationalists are offering platitudes and mark his passing with warm remembrances.
As Quebec television personality Guy A. Lepage put it ;
"In spite of his occasional slips, we all make them, he had all my respect"Former Quebec Premier Bernard Landry said he was deeply saddened by his death.
"Malgré ses dérapes occasionnelles - on en fait tous - il avait tout mon respect"
"I met him often and each time I told him that we all thought the same things as him, but we expressed it quite differently. This made us laugh a lot! " - Bernard LandrySo the ex-Premier believes in the same anglophobic filth as Mr. Falardeau! Hmmm...
Mr. Falardeau may have hated Canada, but had no problem accepting money from Telefilm Canada to finance his projects. When asked about the contradiction, in a television interview, he answered sheepishly that he "had three mouths to feed."
The animator then reminded him that he had previously chastised Francophone artists for taking part in Canada Day Celebrations. "Don't they also have families to feed?"
"You might be right..." answered Falardeau.
A deep thinker, this one.....
As they say in French - Bon Débarras!, good riddance.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)