Wednesday, October 6, 2021

Systemic Racism: For Premier Legault and Apologist media, Denial is Not a River in Egypt

The old adage that tells us that a photo is worth a thousand words can well be updated today to say that a video is worth a thousand photos.
Such is the case with a Facebook video that has nothing less than rocked the foundations of Quebec society and propelled the entire province into much-needed reflection and introspection on racism, especially institutionalized racism where companies, organizations, government offices, our law enforcement,  health, and social institutions discriminate against minorities in a systematic and pervasive manner.

The short video in question was shot by a native woman in a hospital in Joliette who was not only treated with abject contempt but actually died of neglect at the hands of doctors and nurses who assumed that she was simply impaired (like so many unfortunate native patients) rather than facing a very major health crisis.
After hearing damning and devastating evidence, the coroner's inquest into Joyce Echaquan's death concluded rightly that institutional racism contributed to her demise, a notion that old school politicians and nationalist journalists have refused to accept out of hand.

The idea that racism pervades Quebec institutions was roundly rejected by no less than the Premier, the leader of the Bloc Quebecois, the leader of the PQ, and a lapdog French nationalist media who proclaimed that while racism existed in Quebec, it isn't widespread or institutionalized.

I don’t agree when we say there’s a system,” says Premier Legault, refusing to recognize systemic racism exists in Quebec,

Bloc Québécois leader Yves-François Blanchet : While “there are individuals that are racist,” “one should avoid saying that all individuals in that particular group are racist.

The new leader of the Parti Québécois Paul St-Pierre Plamondon says he prefers the term institutional racism over systemic racism because it puts the focus on concretely solving the problem where it exists and not just blaming a system.

As for the nationalist media, the outrage was palpable, where the idea that Quebec faces an existential crisis over racism is a vile and malevolent construct, conceived by enemies of the Quebec 'nation.'

Richard Martineau in Le Journal du Montreal "
The worst part is that during this time, all these good little Quebecers who dream of seeing François Legault admit that there is indeed "systemic racism" in Quebec say absolutely nothing about the federal Indian law!  ...
"
Fortunately, our PM stands up to them and refuses to give in to their blackmail."

Mathieu Bock-Coté in Le Journal du Montreal
"The grand Liberal-Solidaire coalition, the 'PLQS,' this week sought to use the commemoration of the tragic death of Joyce Echaquan in an odious way to force François Legault to bend his knees to the theory of systemic racism.
 

Raymond Parent in Le Journal du Montreal
"I can understand the premier of Quebec's reluctance  to recognize systemic discrimination and I would tend to adopt the same posture if I were in his shoes.

He must consider all the legal impacts that such recognition may have on our political and social choices.
Plus, it's hard to strike up a dialogue with someone who asks you to be on your knees at the start."

Now before you go off on Quebecers as inherently and unrepentantly racist, it's interesting to note that despite the government's denial and the media's general support for the notion that Quebec doesn't suffer from institutional and systemic racism, the majority of Quebecers aren't buying it.
In a poll conducted last week, more than two-thirds of Quebecers believe the opposite of what the government and the media are spoon-feeding them, that is that institutional racism is a serious problem here in Quebec.

As I said, the sad video of the racist treatment of  Joyce Echaquan at the hands of hospital staff is burned into our collective conscience and all the hand-wringing and excuses won't make it go away.  Nobody who viewed the video can un-see it and only the cold-hearted and truly racist cannot help but feeling a little shame and a lot of anger.
The coroner who wrote the damning report highlighted that without the video, the death due to racism, like so many other cases, would go unnoticed and unreported.
Such is the power of video evidence.

At the inquiry, those hurling the abuse were defensive and unapologetic. They were tired and perhaps the video was taken out of context....blah..blah..blah.
No remorse or apology, just excuses, and denial. It's a shameful analogy for the  Quebec establishment.

Years ago, I wrote about a qualified Muslim candidate who was tired of submitting his resume without ever getting an interview. He resubmitted his candidature with an identical C/V, but with a French name instead of his clearly Arab name.
You can guess the result. The C/V with the Arab name was rejected and the identical C/V with a French name was offered an interview.
This in a government office and the very definition of is institutional racism.
The candidate sued and settled out of court for an undisclosed sum, but never received an apology and for the office involved it was back to business as usual.

But the winds of change are blowing and in reaction to the poll and because of the public pressure. those denying institutional racism are changing their tune. 

The new talking point is that perhaps Quebec does suffer from institutional racism but no more so than the rest of Canada.

At least it's a positive step forward and the hard conversation has been opened up.
The public has made it clear that Premier's position is not one they share and that he's going to have to change his tune to remain relevant. 

That said, there remains a deep and knee-jerk defensiveness in the old guard to anybody or anything that challenges the idea of Quebec as a less-than-perfect society.

 In his latest article in  Le Journal du Montreal, Joseph Facal goes off pas a peu près on natives in a rageful and hateful rant, one that I've not seen in a while.

I've done my best to translate for those who have no French, but for those who want to capture the nuance of the original, click on the link

Autochtones: une récupération qui donne la nausée

Aboriginal people, as one of my best readers put it, didn’t have it easy in Canada.
But am I the only one who found that this necessary awareness quickly turned into a vulgar display of  ignorance, pretension and hypocrisy?

The Aboriginal cause has become, for many, the new way to show off one's political-correctness and virtue-signalling, especially when it does not require any sacrifice.  The Prime Minister of Canada improvises a public holiday, sheds crocodile tears and puts feathers on his head. Lightweight teachers who can't write a sentence without making ten mistakes want to "indigenize" their lesson plans and look with suspicion at their colleagues who refuse drink the Kool-aid. Others, hand on heart, want to hire an indigenous teacher, just one, even if it means lowering the criteria, just to say to themselves that they have helped to right a historic wrong. Still others are paid to convince us that indigenous traditional knowledge should be equated with experimental science, as if herbs cured cancer. At Radio-Blablabla, at Le Devoir, in all the media, young journalists display moral certitude proportional to their ignorance.
We accept the bullshit about Montreal, supposedly un-ceded territory, a claim demolished by any non-militant historian, considering it was the site where the Great Peace Treaty of 1701 was signed, precisely because it was seen as relatively neutral. Wrinkled journalists, who refuse to grow old and relive May 68, lecture their flock while well installed in the bourgeois comfort of Outremont. The students, also wanting to make history, are looking for a cause that is not too compelling. And so they are going to insult Legault as “ti-mononcle”, wear an orange sweater, light a candle, put a “Solidarity with Joyce” on their Facebook page, “decolonize” the libraries and sing Imagine.
The burden will be borne and the conscience appeased.
The big, big, big crusade of all these small, medium and large hypocrites is that François Legault must recognize the “systemic” character of racism. We haven't read two books, but we  are convinced, yes, ma'am, that they were  truly "genocided", not "culturally", no, "genocided" period.
What, you deny it? Shame !
The smartest have understood that there is a new profitable avenue here: jobs, media visibility, grants, dissertations and theses, etc. Everything is spectacle, everything is display, everything is recycling, everything is small steps towards great professions of faith.
But all this hypocrisy and drama is just
business for the most part.
Almost all of the posers from the entertainment industry are
first and foremost concerned with self-promotion.
The truth, the real truth, in many indigenous communities, is less glowing: under-education, drug addiction, despair, domestic violence, billions spent who-knows-where, illegal trafficking of all kinds, etc. We prefer not to look at it too closely. It might mar the romantic images.
Our society recycles everything. The important thing is that the misfortune of some can become the "business" of others.

That's quite a blast and leaves me wondering what is the point of the article is.
Why exactly did Mr. Facal write the article?

Is it somehow an explanation as to why Natives should be treated harshly, discriminated against, and left to die in our hospitals?

6 comments:

  1. Interesting that all the names in the above article are journalists for the biggest rag of them all, le Journal de Montréal. The paper is a rag, the people behind it are a rag, there are rabid racist rags like Gilles Proulx on radio, and the beat goes on.

    The solution for the minorities? Like my comments in the previous posting: P-A-R-T-I-T-I-O-N!!! It has been proven for the last half century that all the Anglo and other minority moaning and groaning and bellyaching in all media is just endless rants that will not resolve anything. The measly four MNAs in the Equality Party, short lived for four years 1989-93 didn't do anything and had no leverage. Since the western half of Montreal is predominantly English, build a very high wall along a street near the center, or a block to the east of The Main, and make Western Montreal, if not all of Montreal, part of the new province. If possible, create a land connection by annexing the constituencies of Vaudreuil and Soulange thus connecting to the Ontario border.

    If nobody is going to fight for that, give up, put up, shut up, and suck it up. If the last half century hasn't taught you that all the moaning and groaning achieve nothing and waste your collective energy. If you don't want to leave your homes, then fight for your rights and partition Quebec. Give French Quebec a reason to get their bowels in an uproar. It's unlikely they'll separate. If they had the financial means and gonads to do it, they would have done it long ago.

    The feds won't fight you as you're guaranteeing the partitioned land remains part of Canada. The minorities earn most of the money, pay a greater share of the taxes than the majority, so you have all to gain and little to lose. THINK PARTITION! FOCUS YOUR ENERGIES ON PARTITION!

    PARTITION! PARTITION! PARTITION! PARTITION! PARTITION! PARTITION! PARTITION! PARTITION! PARTITION!

    ReplyDelete
  2. A Google search of "systemic racism definition" returns a definition for "institutional racism" (apparently an interchangeable term):

    "Institutional racism, also known as systemic racism, is a term that refers to a form of racism that is embedded in the laws and regulations of a society or an organization. It manifests as discrimination in areas such as criminal justice, employment, housing, health care, education, and political representation."

    Philip quotes Richard Martineau from Le Journal de Montreal thusly:

    "The worst part is that during this time, all these good little Quebecers who dream of seeing François Legault admit that there is indeed "systemic racism" in Quebec say absolutely nothing about the federal Indian law!..."

    And I would reply to Mr. Martineau that both the Indian Act and the language of education provisions of Bill 101 discriminate the same way: through descent which is a definition of racial discrimination according to an international covenant that Canada signed in 1966 (with Quebec's consent).

    So, if there is systemic racism via the Indian Act then there is most definitely systemic racism in Bill 101.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. With all due respect, Tony, knowing how to search and read a definition tells us what? All I can see from this is you know how to search out a definition. We just had an election three weeks ago, and none, BUT NONE of the federal parties condemned this systemic racism. Votes 1 Money 0.

      Interestingly, Philip already suggested partition as an alternative since all others have failed. Where is the incentive to change. French Quebec is impudent. French Quebec is immune. What is knowing what French Quebec is through an already long established definition going to do. You've seen what the last 50 years have been. Like a bully, "money and the ethnic vote" snivel like the collective victim it is/they are, so where is the bully's incentive to cease the behaviour?
      Passive resistance doesn't work. All the bully has done is pass increasingly constricting the "money and the ethnic vote" like a python that constricts and asphyxiates its prey to death before eating it.

      The feds are laughing at the Quebec minorities like the python's prey, the French Quebec majority is laughing at their own minorities, cheering for the python to catch and eat its prey, so again, the Quebec minorities have been a laughingstock and victim for the last half century, so how does your defining what the whole world already knows do anything?

      Delete
  3. The following was written on October 7th, and despite receiving notification it was received, for some reason, I was censored despite the fact Mr. Berlach tossed around the idea of partition several months ago.

    Interesting that all the names in the above article are journalists for the biggest rag of them all, le Journal de Montréal. The paper is a rag, the people behind it are a rag, there are rabid racist rags like Gilles Proulx on radio, and the beat goes on.

    The solution for the minorities? Like my comments in the previous posting: P-A-R-T-I-T-I-O-N!!! It has been proven for the last half century that all the Anglo and other minority moaning and groaning and bellyaching in all media is just endless rants that will not resolve anything. The measly four MNAs in the Equality Party, short lived for four years 1989-93 didn't do anything and had no leverage. Since the western half of Montreal is predominantly English, build a very high wall along a street near the center, or a block to the east of The Main, and make Western Montreal, if not all of Montreal, part of the new province. If possible, create a land connection by annexing the constituencies of Vaudreuil and Soulange thus connecting to the Ontario border.

    If nobody is going to fight for that, give up, put up, shut up, and suck it up. If the last half century hasn't taught you that all the moaning and groaning achieve nothing and waste your collective energy. If you don't want to leave your homes, then fight for your rights and partition Quebec. Give French Quebec a reason to get their bowels in an uproar. It's unlikely they'll separate. If they had the financial means and gonads to do it, they would have done it long ago.

    The feds won't fight you as you're guaranteeing the partitioned land remains part of Canada. The minorities earn most of the money, pay a greater share of the taxes than the majority, so you have all to gain and little to lose. THINK PARTITION! FOCUS YOUR ENERGIES ON PARTITION!

    PARTITION! PARTITION! PARTITION! PARTITION! PARTITION! PARTITION! PARTITION! PARTITION! PARTITION!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Funny enough, Facal's description of the woke intellectuals as wrinkled journalists who refuse to grow old, want to continually relive May 68, and lecture their flock while well installed in the bourgeois comfort of Outremont, is exactly my definition of a pequiste intellectual who is also a soixante-huitard, a "woke" fighter for "decolonization" of his people and "diversity" of languages. Being a pequiste intellectual makes Facal a soixante-huitard too (I wouldn't be surprised if he himself lived in Outremont), yet here he is scolding other soixante-huitards.

    Funny how pequists who always attacked the anglo colonizer with left-wing arguments (decolonization, diversity) are now suffering these attacks from further left of themselves, and suddenly they shift to the right as they turn against the very same left-wing concepts that they themselves used against the anglo.







    ReplyDelete
  5. LOL, adski! Too funny! Soixante-retards is more like it! But Quebec is diverse in languages: Joual, Creole, and very poorly spoken French. Even their own government endlessly complains about the quality of "French" in Quebec, but what do you expect when French school teachers spend more time playing Joseph Goebbels and constantly hammer anti-English propaganda into the numb skulls of the young with undeveloped frontal lobes for brains. The propaganda is the filler, so the hatred will never end! Dickheads!

    ReplyDelete