Wednesday, January 15, 2020

Harry and Meghan Won't Make it In Canada

For the most part, Canadians are indifferent to the Royal family with almost half believing that the institution is passé. As for hard-core royalists, the number stands at less than 20%.
This is what we expect of royals. Who knows what we will get?
To characterize the Canadian view, ambivalence might be the best word to describe our attitude and even in Quebec where the monarchy is least popular, the level of opposition is minor, where most believe that the Royals are not that important and not an issue to fuss over.

That being said, those who love the monarchy represent an interesting minority whereby the romantic pomp and circumstance is the stuff that feeds dreams and something which has done so long before stories like Cinderella that set young girls' hearts aflutter with dreams of bagging their very own Prince Charming.
Supporting the monarchy costs each Canadian less than the cost of half a paperback romance novel, so complaining about the cost is rather cruel and cheap. The government pays for all sorts of cultural things that only a minority of Canadians enjoy, like museums, festivals, Canadian content on television, subsidies for artists and writers and a plethora of stuff that only a few of us enjoy.

So supporting the monarchy is value for our tax money, whereby those who enjoy following the royals, while a minority, are still a significant number.

But in that implicit bargain is that the royals conduct themselves in a manner that will maintain that interest, in other words acting royally and providing the mystery and pomp and circumstance that those who follow expect and enjoy.

For Meghan and Harry to propose a hybrid change in that compact whereby they will sometimes act royally and sometimes act like private citizens will wear thin on those who do support the monarchy.

We already have royals who act as private citizens in Princesses Eugenie and Beatrice, daughters of the now-disgraced Prince Andrew. These princesses have real jobs and earn their own money, unsupported by taxpayers. They do show up to royal functions as members of the family but are not required, nor do they publicly represent the monarchy.

Good on them, but the reality is that these princesses are of little or no interest to us, having forsaken the glamorous and mysterious life of Royals.
A visit by either of these princesses to Canada wouldn't raise an eyebrow or create any sort of stir.

Those are the waters that Harry and Meghan are now testing, waters that are dangerous and cruel.
Not to put too crude a point on it but they'd both be advised of the old adage that it's not possible to suck and blow at the same time.

As for the cost of their security, at $10 million it may be peanuts in the great scheme of things, but regardless of the cost, taxpayers will have none of it.

The idea that RCMP protection officers will accompany Meghan on a paid acting gig or provide security for Harry while he gives a speech for which he is paid $150,000 is outrageous.

We've already seen portents of this future with the candid video of Prince Harry begging Disney president Bob Iger for a voice-over job for Meghan who pretended not to be aware of what was going on while chatting with Beyoncé
It was an unseemly and decidedly un-royal spectacle. LINK



Canadians are a kind and generous people, but they also have an inane sense of fair play and decency. While we have a lot of varied opinions, when you see 73% agreeing that we shouldn't pay for Meghan and Harry's security, you've reached a consensus.

The erstwhile in-and-out royals should take heed, Canadians aren't going to support their private/public lifestyle, it just will not fly.

Up till now, even amongst non-royalists, Harry and Meghan have enjoyed a decent amount of respect, but that will all change if they believe they can foist their re-invented royal/non-royal life on our dime.

If our government does provide security in the face of overwhelming public opposition there will be Hell to pay, not only for our Prime Minister but Harry and Meghan as well.

For the first time in his life, Harry will face a certain public rebuke and an outspoken opposition that will not remain silent, something that he will be shocked to endure

For Meghan, not really one made of sterner stuff, the criticism will be as painful as what chased her out of Britain.
 
Canadians are willing to accept Meghan and Harry with open arms, free to live the lifestyle they prefer but on condition that taxpayers aren't on the hook for a dime.

I'm betting they haven't really understood that their choice to step away from royal duties has consequences and that once the royal cachet is gone, they are nothing more than celebrities, subject to the whim of popularity.
As the couple ages and their glamour and good looks fade, the royal family with all its trappings will look better and better.

Faced with this unexpected criticism the royal/un-royal couple will likely decamp to Los Angeles, where they will probably fare even worse.

9 comments:

  1. $10 million a year for security?

    What a bargain!

    Just looked it up: the office of Governor-General of Canada cost $38 million in 2018. And I'm pretty sure that includes security.

    Say, I have an idea (I think you know where I'm going with this)...since the Governor-General is supposed to represent the Queen/Crown and since it is largely symbolic anyway, why not have Harry and Megyn serve as G-G?

    Of course, my first choice was William Shatner...and there was a movement afoot several years ago to have him appointed. But Shatner himself screwed up any changes that this would occur when he asked if he could still advocate for endangered salmon while doing the job (partisanship is a no-no).

    Face it: if Shatner had become G-G, everyone would have loved it...AND it would have been a wonderful PR coup as well.

    So since Captain Kirk isn't available, Harry and Megyn will do quite well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, come Tony! Two non-Canadians as our co-Governors-General? It's bad enough we're not yet an independent republic. I think Queen Elizabeth R II is "The Last Emperor". She is the last to represent "The Old Guard" having been coronated when Canada was still predominantly a W.A.S.P. nest. Dem days is over, the Monarchy is mostly a bunch of loose cannon royal stumblebums from the Duke of Edinburgh down to Prince Andrew's association with a billionaire pervert (whose "allowance" has now been revoked...should have been decades ago) and now the Mexit thing.

      Read the following superscathing article from Piers Morgan on his thoughts of Meghan. Puts the whole thing into its truest perspective.

      In summary, I think it's Meghan who is the perpetrator of this whole "Mexit" thing, not that it took a plenitude of coaxing to get Harry on board. It's indubitably difficult for Harry to constantly be in his firstborn brother's umbra much like it was for Princess Margaret under Liz, and I'm sure all the other non-firstborn forbears.

      What's worse is Jessica Brownstein-Mulroney is getting her hands into that succulent pie, but I guess she's just as big a social climber as MM and heaven knows the Mulroneys are, starting with her father-in-law and working its way down. Her boys got their first foray into public life by carrying MM's wedding dress train during the ceremony, so their social climbers-in-waiting. You'll see! Do you remember the woman in the blue dress and hat in the background when Meghan was stating her wedding vows?

      Delete
    2. Whoops. The correct word is forebears, the last word in the second-to-last paragraph above.

      Delete
    3. Blue dress...Monica Lewinsky was at the Royal Wedding?

      Delete
    4. Cute answer Tony, but no. The answer is Meghan's "new" best friend, none other than Jessica Brownstein-Mulroney. OK, they're not new friends, but how did members of her family, her TV colleagues and even any friends from back home get snubbed so?

      I'm not suggesting Piers Morgan is of high moral fibre (hell, no!), but it doesn't bode well to spurn a journalist, even one with questionable scruples, as they get in the last word.

      Delete
    5. Ah, Mr. Sauga...I'm not the only one thinking Harry should be G-G. A recent poll said 60% of Canadians agree with me:

      https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1232788/prince-harry-news-meghan-markle-canada-move-jobs-royal-family

      Delete
    6. Ugh! Sickening--now someone who abandoned all that royal privilege should represent the royals in Canada? G-a-a-a-a-a-g-g-g me-e-e-e-e! It's bad enough those royal stumblebums are still in our lives. If you get HBO, watch Bill Maher's ode to the royals on his show Real Time this past Friday. Couldn't have stated it better myself.

      Delete
  2. P.S. Love the New York Post front page of Harry and Megyn.

    Right up there with other Post classics such as "Headless Body in Topless Bar" and "Khadafy goes Daffy" (featuring a photo of Khadafy in drag, coming on the heels of a rumor that Khadafy was a cross-dresser).

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete