Tuesday, November 6, 2018

Quebec Sovereignty Movement Dying Off Quickly

 The recent deaths of two old-guard separatist heavyweights, Bernard Landry and Richard LeHir may just represent a tipping point in the death spiral of the sovereignty movement in Quebec.

It is said to be uncouth to speak ill of the dead so I won't comment further on the passing of the separatist stalwarts other to say that I did not care for either of the men, both enemies of anglophones and ethnics.
But the two deaths underline the fact that no new generation of significant leaders is emerging because anyone who advocates passionately for Quebec sovereignty is shot down rather cruelly by a movement that no longer believes in itself.

Poor Martine Ouellet was drummed out of the Bloc Quebecois for being too much of a sovereigntist, advocating for militancy in pushing the independence theme. Now Martine was a wacky political figure, but her commitment to sovereignty was admirable and it seems that she was one of the few in the BQ caucus willing to fight to the bitter end for a principle, even if it meant going down with the ship.
Her treacherous BQ comrades in Ottawa have long given up the notion of militating for independence, preferring to advocate for Quebec within Canada instead, thus betraying their raison d'etre.
I guess life is too comfortable and with lucrative pensions growing fatter by the day, who can blame them for taking the cowardly way out.

All this puzzles me because support for sovereignty remains significant in Quebec. In the last provincial election, a combined thirty-three percent of the electorate voted for the Parti Quebecois and Quebec Solidaire. It's true that each of these votes wasn't necessarily a vote for sovereignty, but it certainly gives an indication that even in these dark days of the sovereignty movement, support remains significant.

The PQ has seen a string of less than stellar leaders, ever since the disaster that was the PQ government led by Pauline Marois, a failed tenure in power that had voters abandoning the party in droves.
But the PQ re-build in opposition never happened with the bizarre Pierre-Karl Péladeau doing perhaps the most damage to the brand. Many PQ supporters (social progressives) held their nose in supporting PKP because his star power promised a winning future. But the unstable Péladeau abandoned his leadership rather abruptly, either because of his nasty marriage breakup or because he was plainly unsuited to the task. Péladeau has a history as a rich spoiled brat, an absolute ruler over at Quebecor and someone who obviously could not abide by cooperating with the hoi-polloi of the PQ party.

The earnest yet underwhelming Jean-François Lisée was left to pick up the pieces and like Humpty-Dumpty, all the king's horse and all the king's men couldn't put the PQ back together again.

And so sovereigntist forces face a daunting and frustrating road ahead with most pur et durs having thrown in the towel of political activism long ago.
In fact, those who militate ferociously for Quebec separation are seen, even by those sympathetic, as throwbacks, as if they were members of the flat Earth society.

Perhaps the losing has gone on too long for the faithful and while Quebecers may support the notion of sovereignty, they no longer have the strength to fight for it, considering the battle a lost cause.

Over on Vigile.quebec, the last sovereigntist bastion of opinion, the website mourned the loss of their chief editorialist, ex-politician Richard Le Hir, whose denunciations of all things Canadian were a comforting staple for its constituency of silver-haired over-the-hill militants. His loss will be impactful.
Surprisingly or perhaps not surprisingly, under the section that discussed the PQs past and future was a list of aggregated stories which underlined the utter demoralization and despair of the movement.

Writer after writer bemoaned the fact that the PQ was coming to the end of the road with graphic descriptions of its demise.
The indefatigable sovereigntist Louise Beaudoin described the PQ electoral debacle as a 'slaughter."

For the moment, there is no next-gen sovereigntist leadership and any movement cannot survive without leaders.

Up to now, leaders of the sovereigntist movement had expectations that their travails would or could lead to an independent Quebec. It is what drove them.
Today those hopes are irrealistic and any aspiring leader has to understand that his or her work will lead nowhere.
It isn't a situation which can attract anyone of substance, so clearly, the writing is on the wall, a message written by sovereigntists themselves.

12 comments:

  1. "For the moment, there is no next-gen sovereigntist leadership and any movement cannot survive without leaders."

    Typical of a Right-Wing Conservative commentator to totally ignore, with a mere passing mention, the Impact, Resolve and ongoing GROWTH of the Progressive-Left Movement of Quebec Solidaire !!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The definition of a 'progressive' is someone who wants to spend other people's money on himself.
      The definition of a 'progressive leftist' is someone who wants to spend other peoples money on himself as well as that of his children and grandchildren!

      Delete
    2. I'd be happy to Read that Definition of Progressive in any Dictionary you care to Produce.... Of course when You can't produce one, I'll be happy to accept your apology for all the destruction Conservatives and Neoliberals have wrought on the World and Democracy in general!!

      Delete
    3. OMG, C.S.! Again looking things up in your Funk and Wagnall? This is Philip Berlach's blog, so just follow the commentary and spare us your intricate semantics!

      As far as I'm concerned, Richard Le Hir didn't have opinions! What was his story? Was he expelled from France having to come here to stir the s--t? With him and Landry now dead, we can finally extract the salt and chemicals from their remains that aren't worth $10 together!!! Their contributions to the world have finally reached their peak!

      With most of the demographic that lived through the transition of la révolution tranquille either dead or near dead, what are the country bumpkins in Lac St-Jean, the Saguenay, Hérouxville and just about every place else outside of the Greater Montreal Area going to do?

      I still imagine there will be ebbs and tides, but hopefully with each passing decade, the tides will be less intense and the ebbs will help soothe the tides each cycle.

      I'd like to think with the Quiet Revolution moving further and further from the past, there really is nothing to fight about. "They" got "their" French, they're getting "educated" at the likes of U de Québec and deteriorating French CEGEPs (ohhhhh...how so many of "them" want to go to the English CEGEPs...and universities) that the younger professors are moderating again because the distance of the Quiet Revolution that many of them didn't even go through. The hatred was passed due to bitter stories from their predecessors who are at long last dying off. Lessening tides and soothing ebbs.

      I guess like Trump, the Pur Laine Québécois will panic as the allophones make up a greater percentage of the demographic. I guess the worst fears of the lunatic fringe is coming more into fruition: You live by the cradle, you die by the cradle!

      Get busy and fill dem cradles! ....or else!

      Delete
  2. about jacques parizeau and bernard landry, seems to me like you're not familiar with clarity act.

    about falardeau and le hir, please post quotes from them showing they are racists. here's a hint: mission impossible.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Simply put, separatism is treason, pure and simple. The only good separatist is a dead separatist, as I mentioned above. Their greatest value is in the salt and chemicals of their remains, Clarity Act or no Clarity Act. Case closed.

    ReplyDelete
  4. @sauga

    don't you think in some circumstances treason is the right thing to do?

    or, if you have issues with philosophy, tell me if you "think" canada, australia and usa were right to seek autonomy from the uk.

    this should be enough to dumbfound you mate.

    by the way, writing "cased closed" is typical of someone knowing they don't really have an argument and cheaply trying to limit antagonistic replies. but you may not have been counscious of this.

    ReplyDelete
  5. OK, student, you too want to get into semantics? I figured you absolutely, positively couldn't resist responding to "case closed" ergo I used it. I could've used the term "pure and simple", but again, I couldn't resist goading you with that one, since your raison d'être for writing on this blog is solely to goad. Congrats! As per usual, you fell into my trap.

    Too, BTW, Canada and Australia don't have complete autonomy. Yes, we do have the right to create our own legislation, under constitutions created by our own. Both, though, still recognize the reigning monarch as the Head of State through our governors general.

    I personally am in favour of relinquishing the monarchy in Canada, and so do a lot of Brits. They though would lose a lot of tourists and probably clout if they abolished the monarchy. It's a brand they can market, and do so very well.

    I'd vote in spades for a republic as I see the monarchy as an expense, and until recently I didn't even realize the governors general, after completing their five years of service, still get an expense account they spend very generously upon themselves with your hard-earned money and mine...that is, unless your profession is goading other contributors on blogs.

    ReplyDelete
  6. @sauga

    "I'd vote in spades for a republic..."

    that makes you a traitor, according to your own definition. it follows that you think the world would be a better place if you were dead. case closed mate.

    ReplyDelete
  7. student: Why do you say that? You don't even know me. Anyway, I've been cursed worse by better.

    Oh, and no, I'm not a separatist. All of Canada would be a republic; besides, I think that would appease Quebec. No monarchs on our money anymore! Then again, a new $10 bill is going to feature a non-white woman named Viola Desmond...hmmmm...maybe it should've been Alexandre Dumas...Maybe Michaëlle "Suck the Government's Teat for all it's Worth" Jean...NO, WAIT...they aren't indigenous Canadians! Dumas isn't Canadian at all....

    Oh...and student, if you wrote what you did was because I got under your skin.....GOOD!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Considering that the BQ has back absolutely everyone that originally bailed out months before, it's a pretty safe bet they're not letting it die out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, hell no, Mel! Of course they're not going to die out until their empty-headed supporters quit voting for them. What a job! A salary well over $100k a year, a generous expense account, a travel allowance and a slew of other gold-plated perqs and of course a platinum-plated pension if they could keep their seats for at least six years! Even if they don't make the six years they get an uber generous severance gift.

      Beyond that, they get to sit in parliament and shoot their mouths off if for no other reason than to keep up appearances, and if they're no-shows now and then, their silence is probably welcome by everybody else. WHAT A CINCHY JOB! WHAT A CINCHY LIFE!

      Delete