Exactly what is the judge protecting children from, when a publication ban is imposed in a divorce case? Are children of divorcing parents subject to scorn and ridicule? I think the judge has to get with the times and realize that not only is a ban a bad idea, but impossible to enforce.
American media, not subject to the ban, delight in publishing facts that our regular media may not.
The Montreal Gazette, as I reported, practically outed the Montreal defendant by referring him as a "Montreal Billionaire" and an American blog has picked up on it.
The ever popular drunkenstepfather blog revealed all in a January 23rd story and has included some libelous (if untrue) and deliciously salacious background information.