Tuesday, February 15, 2022

5 Reason Russia Shouldn't Invade Ukraine

 We're hearing a lot of noise concerning a potential attack on Ukraine by Russia with politicians across the West making dire warnings that an invasion is about to be launched by Russia.

I'm not buying it because as Judge Judy is fond of saying .... "If it doesn't make sense it isn't true!"

I think we are being sold a fantasy in order for the West to frighten us and soften us up for the inevitable negotiated concessions that it will make towards ending the standoff. 

While the western governments and its attendant media keep whooping up such an attack, Vladimir Putin says he isn't planning any such thing. 
I believe him,.
A Russian invasion of Ukraine makes no sense at all while bluffing a war does make complete sense.

Here are five reasons war is not on tap.

NUMBER 1
We have been told that Russia has amassed a huge force of 150,000 troops surrounding Ukraine, poised to attack any time now.
BUT 150,000 troops is NOT as big a number as we are led to believe.
When the USA led an invasion of Saddam Hussein's Iraq,  it consisted of 500,000 troops,  more than three times larger than the Russians invasion force today. And those American-led troops were infinitely better trained and equipped than the Russians who haven't fought a conventional war since World War 2.  Ukraine is not small, it has twice the land area of Iraq, making an invasion even harder than the largely undefended Iraq.

 NUMBER 2
A common military rule is that invading forces need to be three times as large as the defending force and Ukraine's 250,000 person defence force while not a crack-fighting force, is still formidable considering that they only have to defend, a huge advantage.
With the supply of ultra-modern weapons provided by NATO recently, Russia would likely win but with unacceptable losses.

NUMBER 3
The last contested military adventure Russia fought was in Afghanistan, a total disaster that still reverberates in Russia with the population unforgiving towards the government over the 15,000 dead and 35,000 injured soldiers.
All for naught.
The Russian people are hardy and brave as World War 2 demonstrated, but they aren't stupid and have little appetite for a foreign military adventure that will cost lives over little to gain.

NUMBER 4
The risk to reward is just not there.
That Russia doesn't want Ukraine to join NATO or fall deeply into a western alliance is hardly a reason to risk a devastating war that would have, win or lose, Russia suffering disproportionate harm.
The victorious Russians would have to keep a huge occupying force to maintain control and a motivated Ukrainian population would launch a devastating guerilla war all backed by western support and weapons. 
The Western reaction would be crippling sanctions that would further drive the Russian economy into the toilet.

NUMBER 5
Putin is a supremely crafty customer who understands that the West,  whose leaders in both Germany and the United States are in no mood to face off in any military confrontation.
A bellicose and threatening Russia with a feigned invasion will wrest the necessary concession from the West, which is that Ukraine not join NATO or become a Western proxy state.

And so the fear-mongering spread by Western media is merely a smokescreen meant to soften the public into accepting Putin's terms.
Putin doesn't want another Western proxy state on its border, which is not altogether unreasonable.

Before you accept the Western argument that a free, independent state should not be bullied into accepting a foreign government dictate, let us remember that the USA did exactly the same thing back in 1962 in threatening Cuba into giving up offensive Russian missiles during the Cuban missile crisis.

So don't believe an invasion is coming, it makes no sense to either side..  

8 comments:

  1. Rebuttals:

    1. Would Russia not gain favour with allies to join the fight, if for no other reason that Russia has more might than many of its smaller allies?

    2. The Russian failure in Afghanistan: America failed, too, and I knew it would if the Russians couldn't succeed. The Afghan people know every nook and cranny of their mountains and caves inside out. They ate armies as Russia found out. Russia and America don't know the terrain a fraction as well as Afghanistan.

    3. We already saw in 1938 what hypocrites and wusses the UK and France were when they handed the Czech Sudetenland to Hitler. It did avert war--for a whole 11 months, not to mention cripple Czechoslovakia right then and there.

    I'd love to see the Russian economy driven down the toilet. Of course, Putin and those nearest and dearest to him wouldn't be the ones suffering, but having had ascendants who fled Russia (think Fiddler on the Roof) makes me want Russia to suffer as long as I'm on this Earth. I still to this day wish Jean-Paul Parisé followed through and stick-whacked paid-off German referee Josef Kompalla for his blatantly biased officiating antics at the 1972 Canada-USSR series. They still live their perverted totalitarian ways and even recently looked to cheat the system with a 15-year-old figure skater. The alibies given for her ingesting of that illegal substance were lame beyond the pale.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @sauga

      just write a list of things you don't hate instead, you'll be done quicker, mate.

      Delete
    2. Mr Sauga: You clearly have so much knowledge and it's actually really interesting to read your comments when you're not just repeating how much quebec sucks (we all know!)

      Thank you!

      Delete
    3. "having had ascendants who fled Russia (think Fiddler on the Roof) makes me want Russia to suffer as long as I'm on this Earth"

      I think this hatred of Orthodox Russia by the Jews is what drives the anti-Russian policy in America to a large extent, with neocon Jews such as Victoria Nuland being influential figures in US foreign policy.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous: Thank you for your compliment. I have many times written about other topics, or ancillary topics even when it involves Quebec. Student: In the case of Russia/USSR, what I like would mount to a blank page. Perhaps their Baluga caviar, but I've never been a big fan of caviar (salty fish eggs, yech)!

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is hilarious. A edit and repost two whole weeks later. A simple "I was wrong" would have been less effort and more noble.

    I get it though. Modern conservatives define themselves almost purely in contradistinction to liberals. So when liberals say "Putin bad" they contort themselves to take the opposing views: "Putin is so strong, so crafty, so handsome. He's too smart to start a war. The libs are just trying to scare us".

    This post aged poorly and hindsight fueled edits don't change this fact. There's this saying "the more you stir shit, the more it stinks". You should have stopped stirring and just said "I was wrong".

    ReplyDelete
  4. Forgot to change the title on the html file:
    http://nodogsoranglophones.blogspot.com/2022/02/reason-russia-will-not-invade-ukraine.html

    "shouldn't have" would be a more appropriate edit, no?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It looks like the days of Nulandistan are now numbered. Ukraine will now have to be rebuilt without the neo-nazis running the place.

      Delete