Friday, July 16, 2021

Did Quebec's Language Obsession Cost Habs the Stanley Cup?


I've been itching to write a blog post such as this for many years, ever since Francophone journalists and sports commentators started exorcising the Montreal Canadiens for having so few Quebec francophones on the team.

Diving into the realm of 'what if' is a risky endeavour at best and foolish at worst, but it might serve to counter the hysterical rhetoric of language fanatics who demand that the Canadiens operate under a handicap that no other NHL team would entertain.

I'm referring to the impossible and ridiculous "Savard Doctrine" which dictates that the Montreal Canadiens should always opt for the francophone when a choice is to be made between players of equal value.

It was nonsense when Serge Savard, the general manager of the time, first enunciated the policy and it is nonsense today because, in the real world, those choices don't ever present.
In fact, Savard never gave us an example of a choice that he made based on the policy.


The Savard Doctrine, in and of itself, is harmless enough because even in the most implausible of circumstances where the team could choose a francophone instead of another player of equal talent, there would be no discernible harm.
But it did establish language as a hiring criterion, opening the door for fanatics to push even harder for the team to consider French as an important element in the hiring process, even when the choice of a francophone player isn't the best hockey decision.

You might well remember the sacking of interim coach Randy Cunneyworth a few years back, over his lack of French. The furor was ugly and nasty, including a demonstration by language fanatics in front of the arena. I'm pretty sure it frightened the bejesus out of its lightweight managing owner Geoff Molson who caved into the pressure throwing the lame-duck coach under the bus. 
It was a powerful portent of things to come and established firmly that language would indeed become an enduring handicap.
Nationalists will defend to the death the notion that making French an important criterion in player selection won't impact quality but it cannot help but do so.
If the team was saddled with the rule that left-handed players be hired in preference to right-handed players, who would argue that quality would not suffer?

The gran-daddy of Habs French/first lobby is the nasty Anglophobic doyon of Quebec's sports commentator Rejean Tremblay who is a legend for his sarcastic and sour missives targeting anglophones and ethnics. His racist bent is not a phenomenon of a bygone era, he continues to spout his nasty and racist screeds, published in the mainstream media by the likewise racially insensitive Journal du Montreal.

"Everything is going well because we are winning ..
The Habs could field 20 Chinese players and it would be okay.
If the KHL convinced the Chinese to embrace hockey,
we'd find ourselves with 20 Fang Wongs in 20 years.
 

Incidentally, that article insulted the Canadiens organizations as well as its fans for putting hockey before language, an unpardonable sin.

And the argument for the Habs to make language a part of the hiring process is repeated ad nauseam, including the mayor of Montreal and Premier Legault advocating for more "Quebecois" (read: 'francophone' ) who are able to communicate with fans in French be given preference.  The Premier opined that perhaps the return of the Nordiques would spur a competition with the Habs to hire more "Quebecois." Truthfully, the return of the Nordiques is a goal for like-minded nationalists who dream of a team that better represents their ideal of Quebec.

At any rate, I come to the gist of this article, the fact that the Canadiens may just have lost the Stanley Cup because of the disastrous player trade that brought the now sidelined Jonathan Drouin to the Habs for first-round draft choice Mikhail Sergachev. Tampa Bay general manager Steve Yzerman must have rubbed his hand in glee when he dumped problem-child Drouin on the Habs for a coveted first-round draft pick. It will go down as one of the worst trades in Canadiens history, perhaps on a par with the Scott Gomez acquisition for Ryan McDonough.

Drouin was already a big problem in Tampa Bay, at loggerheads with the team, going on a mini strike and demanding a trade.
As damaged goods, you'd think Drouin would be a bargain, but not for the desperate Habs eager to sign a francophone.
And so Tampa Bay Lightning got a young defenceman with a bright and long future and the Habs got sad sack Drouin. The Habs media was giddy with joy, with nobody willing to say the truth out loud or in print... that is,  that the desperate Habs were hoodwinked.
By the way, don't blame Montreal GM Marc Bergevinfor the trade, language pressure was the key element for making the trade thanks to pressure from the public and from team ownership desperate for more francophone players.

And so we come to the recent and surprising meeting of the Habs and Lightning in the Stanley Cup final, which like any playoff series can turn of the smallest of edges.

Drouin was gone, absent, on leave from the team for what we can only assume is a serious mental condition, while Sergachev played significant minutes, contributing big-time to the Lightening defence.

Imagine Sergachev playing for the Habs and Drouin not playing for the Lightning during the series.
It might have been the difference between being a runner-up and winning the Stanley Cup.

While we'll never know, it remains that nobody in the French media will dare speculate on the issue because they all supported the idiotic trade.

And so the chickens have come home to roost.
The broken Savard Doctrine is a fantasy that the entire Quebec hockey scene continues to embrace and so admitting that it might just have cost the city a Stanley Cup is an idea too frightening and horrific to entertain, one that cannot be mentioned out loud by the media on pain of excommunication.

7 comments:

  1. I recall reading a series of articles in JdeM around the time the playoffs were starting where they complained about the Canadiens fielding lineups without any francophones in them for the first time in history (contravening the Savard Doctrine I suppose?) and how this was ruining the francophone character of the team. I recall not giving it much thought at the time but when the Canadiens started winning every series and getting through to the next rounds of the playoffs I thought back to those articles thinking that maybe there's a lesson to be learned here, that maybe fielding best players regardless of their background works better for a franchise.

    Similar thing happened to Don Cherry's junior team a while back, he insisted on prioritizing "Canadian talent" and ignoring foreign players, and his team ended up lingering at the bottom of the table. I don't remember if Cherry ever moved away from his approach, but in the 2020-2021 season the Canadiens seem to have moved away from their doctrine and it appears to have paid dividends.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wonder.

      I'm the last person to support either tokenism, affirmative action, set-asides, or quotas. Yet if I understand correctly, one version or other of the aforementioned systems was in place for the Canadiens if there was a requirement -- unwritten or otherwise -- was for a certain number of francophone players to be on the team.

      I was born in 1955. As a kid and well into the '70s I followed Hockey avidly. The ritual every morning at the breakfast table was to turn to the Sports page and analyse the box scores.

      Yet by the time I was 24 in 1979, the Habs had won the Stanley Cup 15 times. Indeed, it was an unusual year when they did NOT win it. We were spoiled. And it was around 1980 that I stopped watching hockey simply because I felt, well, that's it, you can't top that. There's no way Montreal can continue to be as successful here on out and I'm going to stop following it closely because I don't need the aggravation and frustration of following a team that won't win every other year.

      But my point is: if the francophone rule was in place during those years when they were so successful, I must grudgingly admit that the quota system worked...much to my chagrin because, as I said, I'm not a fan of quotas and all that stuff.

      Delete
  2. The francization of the Canadiens Hockey team wasn't limited to the players.

    In the '70s, I used to go to a lot of games. I was in school at the time and didn't have much money so I always bought Standing Room. It was $2.50 a game for Standing Room behind either the Whites (middle tier) or the Blues (upper level). Behind the Reds -- the closest to the ice -- cost, IIRC, was $5.50 and something that I would splurge on if it was anticipated as a good contest. Or maybe it was $2.50 also and $5.50 was for the playoffs. Can't remember.

    Anyway, one time I was behind the Reds and the unofficial team mascot was "Dutch." This was the guy who used to scream "Go Habs Go" and other stuff. He did have other stuff he said but most was in English. So once when I was there, there was a francophone in the first row of the White section who got pissed off at him and yelled at him: "Say it in French or not at all." And wouldn't you know it, from then on Dutch screamed his pep phrases in mostly French, such as "souvenir, souvenir" whenever a puck went into the stands.

    Apropos of nothing, another memory of those days was one of the hawkers of junk food that used to go through the stands selling their goods. This guy was there for years. And all he ever said was: "Soft Drink. Coke. Pepsi. Seven-up. You got it" with a long drawn out and rolled "r" in the word "drink." Never changed the wording for all the time I went to games.

    Not sure, but I don't think the ushers were paid. I think their compensation was getting to watch the game for free.

    Another memory: the frankfurters they sold at the Forum were grilled and not steamed which I think from a business viewpoint was much harder to do; steamed would have been more practical, cheaper, easier to do, and had the potential for greater profits. Yet they went to the trouble of grilling them and I remember them as the best hot dogs you could get in Montreal.

    ReplyDelete
  3. adski: "...articles in JdeM around the time the playoffs were starting where they complained about the Canadiens fielding lineups without any francophones..."

    OMG OMG OMG! This crap again?

    WTF was Philip Danault? Russian? The goddamn pro-separatist, anti-everything-not-Québécois pur laine J de M endlessly writes about this over flogged dead horse, it's proof that paper is for whiney little separatist bitches, and anyone who reads that paper has an I.Q. less than half their shoe size!

    Interestingly, I've been communicating with a ex-Montrealer buddy of mine who has located overseas, still follows the Habs, and talked about ensuring they have at least one French speaker on their roster. Paul Byron speaks a pretty good French.

    It seems Tampa Bay does a very good job of scouring for French speakers in Quebec, and has gotten some good ones! The current T.B. G.M. is Julien Brisebois, with Steve Yzerman now back in Detroit. To acquire some good local talent, perhaps Habs should invest more for Quebec scouts scouring the state. Looks like M. Brisebois is doing exactly that. The days of getting two top picks from Quebec last took place in 1969 and with an American running the show and the Office of the Commissioner now in NYC vs MTL, fuhgeddaboudit!

    With the costs of running a team becoming ever increasingly expensive, I've heard on 680 NEWS, all all-talk business-focused AM radio station in Toronto, like mutual funds, pro teams are going to start being sold in units like mutual funds, so you can be sure that if the Habs go in this direction, the whiney little bitchy reporters will drive the Montreal Canadiens to another city. Even superrich multibillionaires are finding it hard to own teams themselves, so this is going to be the way of the future. The prediction is the teams will be run more efficiently this way, and those who don't risk being relocated. To Quebec City? In a pig's eye! TAKE THAT, J de M! Take that too you winey nationalist bitches!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Tony: Yup, ♫those were the days!♪ The hot dog buns, too, were toasted, not steamed. My traumatizing experience with rink food took place at the old Memorial Auditorium when I saw the Habs in a playoff game in Buffalo circa 1991. I got a hot dog, and I just about gagged on it. It was awful, far from the virtual gourmet treat those Forum hot dogs were. I'm confident the usherettes were paid, with the prettiest ones reserved for the most expensive tickets in the house. Back until the 80s anyway, the organization treated everybody first class, from ushers, to ticket takers, to those who cleaned and swept up after games.

    Prior to the universal draft that started in 1963, teams held territorial rights to players. Frank Selke Sr., far and away, did the best job of creating farm teams, especially in Quebec, that held a plenitude of players. Some of their farm teams were better than some NHL clubs, especially in the days of the Original Six and even after that first expansion in 1967.

    Sam Pollock had the luxury of inheriting a strong development system, plus he worked twice as hard as other GMs back in the day, often working 18-20-hour days. He spent that extra time looking at what the other teams had, what they needed and how he could get something for what those teams needed. Pollock traded established players, often a little past their prime to acquire draft picks. He did a good job trading these established players to the weakest teams (think L.A. Kings, Oakland and the Colorado Rockies) and resulted some years in getting up to four first-round picks. Unlike for a few years in the 1960s, no team gets to pick two top Quebec players before the universal draft starts, another machination by Pollock when the Prez of the League was a few blocks away.

    Too, with today's salary caps, there would have been no way they would have had the dynasty they had in the 1970s. Keeping Lafleur, Shutt, Lemaire, Robinson, Lapointe, Savard and Dryden together would be unlikely since they had other good non-all-stars like Riseborough, Wilson and Tremblay they would have to pay as well.

    The universal draft is long gone, there are no longer preferential regional picks, and the amateur draft is fair game for any players, from anywhere. With a 32-team league now, the Quebec talent has 31 venues outside Montreal to go to, if picked.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oops...a couple of errors, but it was almost 3AM when I wrote all of the above. The universal draft is NOT long gone, the preferential picks of the latter 60s and the territorial exclusions are long gone.

      Too, "I've heard on 680 NEWS, all all-talk business-focused AM radio station..." should of course read AN all-talk...

      I guess the good news for J de M is the sole Québécois pur laine player, Danault, was not taken in the expansion draft. ♫ Oh, happy day...♪

      Delete
  5. A few years ago, Montreal had an interim Mayor, who just happened to be an Anglophone. This did not set well with Francophones. In their minds, only Francophones are qualified to be Mayor; or Premier.

    I don't believe Francophones are hockey fans, nor were they ever even baseball fans. Or fans of any sport; what they are, are Francophone fans.

    When the Expos traded for a Francophone pitcher, people (Francos) turned out, but once he started to pitch poorly, they lost interest.

    That's why they aren't happy even if the team is winning, but has just one or two Francophone players on it. They need to feel in control.

    Basically, Canada has one minority group: Francophones. First Nations and Indigenous people are tolerated with, and black and brown people don't exist.

    JdeM goes on and nauseum about language, yet are the first to praise a Francophone who is working in the US (such as a female sports therapist working for an NFL team). They also will highlight any Francophone who has released a song/CD in English. (Apparently, English is great to learn, after all). Oddly enough, they never allow comments to be posted on the stories about Francos embracing English.

    It comes down to this, English is okay for francophones to speak or sing it; but it's not okay for anglophones to use it.

    ReplyDelete