Thursday, April 9, 2020

It's Soon Time to Re-Open Schools and Phase Out Social-Distancing

Dealing with the Wuhan virus long-term seems to be where we are going as health officials tell us that it isn't going away and that it probably will become a seasonal thing.

I wrote a piece a while back, describing the danger that the virus poses to the elderly and that prediction seems to have been borne out.
Read:
Premier Legault mentioned that 89% of the Wuhan virus deaths so far in Quebec are in the demographic age group of 70 and over. Most of the other deaths occur in victims with underlying ailments.
That means that just 17 deaths so far are in those younger than 70 years old and almost none in the under 40 years old demographic.

Quebecers have largely hunkered down and stayed home and it's reported in that regard we have done better than any other jurisdiction in North America.

And so today the propagation of the virus is largely restricted to senior residences where people are packed in like sardines and where tragically the virus propagated before the lockdown occurred.
The virus was brought into the homes by the children of these residents who visited after travelling abroad, mostly to Europe.
The cross-contamination occurred when employees worked in different residences and brought the virus from one infected residence to another. A perfect storm of contamination.

This sad state of affairs is what I warned about when I said that seniors and those vulnerable should be isolated completely. Alas, it was too late and the damage is now done.
Sadly many seniors will die and paradoxically while we've managed to insulate and protect the large part of society and the least vulnerable, seniors will bear the brunt of the deaths and there's not much we can do about it.
The die is cast.

But these deaths are misleading because they taint the numbers and lead us to believe that we are all in mortal danger which we are not.

The famous curve has been flattened, assuring that hospitals aren't overwhelmed because those seniors who die from the virus do so generally quickly and without burning up precious ER resources.

And so it's time to reopen society, bit by bit, all the time making sure our hospitals can cope.

In this respect, it's time to re-open up daycare and primary schools in order that children become harmlessly exposed thus creating a new generation of the immune. Unlike the famous measles parties of my generation, children suffer almost no symptoms and most don't even know they have the virus.
In just two or three weeks, 15% of our population will become immune.
The parents and teachers of these younger children are in a demographic age-group that should do well when they become infected from their children and will survive, although some will need hospitalization.

The next phase is to open high schools and universities where a slight less positive outcome will occur, but an outcome that our hospitals can deal with and with some inevitable deaths, but still very, very few.
A caveat to all this is that those in this demographic who have underlying health issues must still be isolated.

This phased re-opening of society is the necessary step to insure that the virus burns through society at a controllable rate, like a preventative fire lit to control a forest fire.

I don't think it is reasonable to close down society for the time it takes to find a cure or treatment, we cannot afford it both mentally and economically.

Within a month stores and restaurants should reopen with distancing rules still in place.
Factories and businesses should start up cautiously and life needs to return to a semblance of normalcy.

The only criterion that counts is whether our hospitals can keep up and so a staged re-opening of society should start, probably within two weeks.

We are going to have to face the reality that the virus is here to stay and getting those under 40 (which represents half the population and the most productive) exposed over a controllable period is preferable to hiding at home and delaying the inevitable.

Under this plan, half the population would be free of the virus within two or three months.

By the way, many of the health workers and front line workers are already coming back to work after having defeated the virus. Hospitals are now at a point where patients are being discharged to the point where the influx of new patients is manageable.

The virus spreading through the general population, excluding the elderly and those with underlying health conditions must continue in order for society to get back on its feet.

Only when the rest of society acquires herd immunity can the seniors be protected, so it's important to get on with it.

Once the elderly and the compromised are safely isolated as best we can, it's time for the rest of us to go out and mix and yes, get the virus.
Some will die, but some will die even if we delay.
It's counter-intuitive to re-open society, but necessary so that we can get over the hump.

Bold decisions need to be made and they need to be made soon.
Like a general sending his troops into battle full well understanding that some will die, our leaders must forge ahead bravely and face down the virus for the greater good.
Now is the time for fearless leadership.

7 comments:

  1. First of all, a Healthy Passover and Easter to your Christo Judaic readers. I say healthy instead of happy because this isn't a happy season in light of current events.

    That being said, I think this editorial is overly simplified. There is merit to the theory of all that is stated above, but there are lots of caveats.

    I for one have stepped back and have decided, for the time being anyway, to wind down my career, and it's my choice of occupation where one of these caveats comes to mind. I am currently driving a school bus as, at least up to now, there has been a shortage of drivers, and it has been a good way to adequately supplement my income, work in the outdoors after decades of being cooped up in an office and often chained to my cubicle. My stress levels are vastly relieved, so in many ways it has been more of a blessing in disguise than I first thought it would be.

    Unfortunately, with schools closed for the foreseeable future, I'm out of work since mid-March and I imagine this will go on for sometime. Here's a caveat for you: Most drivers are retirees, mostly over 60 AND 70 years of age. Going back to the buses under the current circumstances can be dangerous to most of the staff due to our advanced ages as the young students can carry the virus and render many drivers ill.

    When I'm transporting especially young charges (early elementary school), I hear them hacking and coughing right from the get-go, and many don't properly cover their mouths and noses when they cough or sneeze. By the way, I drove several years ago during the jobless recovery of the 1990s. I didn't like it so much then as I was seeking more gainful employment on a full-time basis. Too, I found the companies poorly compensated their drivers, not that the pay is great now, but it's better than it was back then.

    Medical personnel are being asked to come out of retirement to help with this crisis. While I'm sure many have private transportation to curb the spread, many others rely on public transportation. With ex-retirees being of an older demographic, this greatly increases their risk of catching the virus, and spreading it, too. Many volunteers are retirees (read older people), yet their gratuitous services are very needed and very welcome. Why should they risk their lives for no compensation. Voluntary work is a very noble deed, but your editorial renders them fools, or at least that's my perception whether intended or not.

    Finally, the post WWII Baby Boom has rendered our demographics nationally as older than other nations, and so ignoring the aging population can be seen as an intergenerational conflict. Trouble is, most older people are more dutiful going to the poles during elections whereas many young have become apathetic to the democratic process. This apathy is at their own peril. I think this editorial is too simplified, and most children, even grown up children, still love their parents and will go to any length to spare their lives as long as they could. War indubitably has its sacrificial lambs, and while this is every bit a war, it's not one with armaments. THAT is the biggest difference between the two.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree totally with your assessment Philip. Its high time we send the low risk majority of the population back to school and work while keeping the vulnerable locked away. The quicker the under 50 get this the quicker we can get herd immunity and get on with things.

    The damage to the economy is staggering..we are no longer a nation that can afford this type of event. Debt racked up since the 1970s across the western world has rendered most nations effectively bankrupt and now we are going full ballistic in ramping up the debt. This will screw up our health care system even more than it already is killing many more people in the end then we will save from this pandemic. Thats not counting all the other deaths from eventual mass unemployment, depression, stress, anxiety, poor nutrition and so on.

    We didn't lock people down from swine flu nor any other flus which kill thousands per year and we sure as heck should not be locking everyone down with this flu.

    But our soft politicians who cant bear the thought of anybody dying on their watch will likely drag this down way longer than necessary to score political points. Unfortunately many Canadians buy into this end of the world pandemic narrative and will likely scream if we open up the schools and a few kids die. But kids die all the time from the flu..in fact the death rate is lower for young people with this flu than the regular flu..double standards.

    I personally think the world has gone completely mad..social media driving this maybe..or this new virtue signalling era of saving everybody at any cost..who knows but its insane.


    ReplyDelete
  3. Is it worth it?

    Half a billion people may be plunged into poverty...not as a result of getting COVID-19 but as a result of the economic stand-still. And of those half a billion, how many will die?

    It is not out of the realm of possibility that for every one coronavirus death there will be 100 third world deaths.

    https://apnews.com/b219627e31d87779e5253f9a072be4dc

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What you wrote (and the link you attached) has merit, but if it's third-world countries, what else is new? A lot of the poverty is caused by dictatorial despots who don't give a rat's ass whether their people live or die, so long as they get the loot. Case in point: Kim Jung Un. I'm not trying to state I'm indifferent to their suffering, but even if the west was to defeat these despots and put in provisional governments, a new despot would fill the vacuum, and this goes on and on and on...

      Delete
  4. This is huge.

    When the main stream media breaks with the sky-is-falling narrative, I believe that this is the beginning of the end.

    From Fareed Zakaria, yesterday, in the Washington Post: "a fatality rate...similar to that of the seasonal flu."


    It's all about the denominator:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/without-mass-testing-were-flying-blind-through-this-crisis/2020/04/09/bf61e178-7a9b-11ea-a130-df573469f094_story.html

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yeah I keep reading more and more articles that are saying the death rates are grossly exaggerate. The real problem have been the senior residences which were not well handled by many countries around the world including here in Quebec. What happened at the Herron residence is awful but shows how poorly operated many of these places are.

    There should have been way stricter rules in place earlier for the seniors homes..personnel should not have been allowed to work at different facilities..and more doctors/nurses should have been made available in these buildings earlier on.

    Meanwhile we shut the whole damn country down but we under react for the most vulnerable..over react for the general population and under react for the most vulnerable. But this will be a learning experience for many people.

    ReplyDelete
  6. According to Knut Wittkowski, social distancing and keeping kids out of schools is prolonging the pandemic. He says that the ONLY way to innoculate ourselves against COVID-19 is through herd immunization and the only way to accomplish that is to get the bug and pass it on amongst ourselves, get everyone to have it, survive it, and that's how it disappears. Of course, those that are members of the high risk demographics -- such as age 65+ and those with pre-existing conditions -- should self-isolate until the herd immunization is accomplished.

    Had we done that from the beginning, we would already have achieved it by now...with minimal deaths.

    See:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGC5sGdz4kg

    ReplyDelete