How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Climate Change

Walking my dog through the park on a marvellous 20 degree plus October day, I came across beautiful and colourful butterflies fluttering along.

Climate Fraudsters

Marvellous!
Those abounding insects in late Autumn testify that the climate is getting warmer and a good thing that it is.
I have seen and accept evidence that the Earth is in a warming phase, but pay no heed because the Earth is always warming or cooling. If mankind has sped up the process a bit, by virtue mostly of the vast population explosion, so be it.

The media and the climate doom saying scientists have been recklessly predicting catastrophe for the last thirty years and continue to churn out doomsday forecasts of our imminent demise without shame, predictions that happily never actually materialize.
When faced with the reality of those failed predictions, they push the date a little further on down the line, stringing us along the climate change charade, taking us for a ride like a donkey chasing a carrot held on a stick in front of its head by its rider, never to be actually reached.

You'd think we'd be smarter than that dumb ass, but alas as a society we are not, lapping up the nonsense that we are on the road to climate ruin, which like the Jewish Messiah is forever coming, but never actually arrives.
Alas, the messianic obsession with the end of the world predictions is utterly painful to watch for those of us, not of the faith and otherwise unconvinced.

More in sorrow than in anger I watch with incredulity the rapturous climate-disaster adherents pay reverential homage and piety to the latest Joan of Arc of the climate change movement, the 16-year-old Greta Thunberg who like the apparition of Our Lady of Fatima has risen to guide us all to the path to redemption.
It would be comical if not so sad.

Every time some brave unbeliever disputes the coming climate disaster, he or she is attacked as an utter fool or apostate, all with the fervour of a Muslim extremist explaining with absolute certainty the reality of those 72 virgins awaiting him in Heaven.
It's hard to argue with that kind of religious zealotry and thus equally as hard to argue with climate change fanatics. To them, there can be no discussion because after all, as God to some, there can be no other valid reality.
And as the jihadist explains, who can actually say that there aren't 72 virgins in Heaven awaiting the pious.

I don't worry about climate change, in the same way that I don't worry about crashing when boarding an airplane.
The situation is out of my hands, just as climate change is.

All the alarming rhetoric and hysterical entreaties haven't made a difference in our so-called carbon footprint. Climate change fanatics have generally done no more (other than talk) to change their habits and seem to adhere to a policy that something has to be done to avert global warming, but that something should be done by someone else and paid for by others.

Climate evangelists like Al Gore, David Suzuki and even Prince Harry live privileged lives in huge mansions and have carbon footprints that stagger the imagination. They flit around the world in jets (sometimes private jets) to preach about the evils of global warming and the coming doom to fanatics. Cleverly they claim they 'offset' their own huge carbon footprint by buying so-called 'carbon credits,' which is a clever way out of a sticky wicket. Buying a carbon offset is easily explained as paying someone else to do the prison time for the crime you committed.

A week after meeting Greta, Arnold is seen tooling around in this gas-guzzler.

Celebrities like Arnold Schwarzenegger, with a staggering carbon footprint, preach to us about climate change.
It is sickening.
Read about this fraudster


So in the climate change world, rich people don't have to moderate their behaviour, just the hoi-polloi.
It is the weakness and contradictions of the movement that leave me out of the global-warming disaster camp because, for one, all the hysterical disaster predictions over the thirty years have proven false.
You know the old saying....

Fool me once, shame on you
Fool me twice shame on me!

A cold analysis of our human condition can only conclude that even if the impending climate disaster is real, we can do nothing about it because mankind is incapable of making meaningful change.
The significant changes that would be required should all these predictions be true are out of our reach because humans, individually and collectively have proven that they are selfish, short-sighted and unwilling to undertake the harder path for long-term gain.

It just isn't in us.

The great popularity of Greta Thunberg is in the blame she heaps on the older generations who she blasts for climate change,
This theme is wildly popular with the young because it demands that another generation fix the problem, something which is never going to happen.
Her popularity would crumble if she proposed that her generation take charge and make the sacrifices necessary.
Imagine if Greta proposed that young people stop eating meat, consume less manufactured products and buy less clothing in the name of wasteful fashion. She should tell them that they must curtail flying and car ownership. They must undertake not to use disposable diapers and sanitary products and commit to living in smaller quarters, closer to their jobs. She'd have them commit to changing their electronic equipment like phones and computers less often, perhaps every ten years.  Commit to pay three or four times the price for energy, be it gasoline, natural gas or electricity. Eliminate backyard barbeques, fireplaces and campfires.
Vending machines that distribute water, pop and juices in plastic bottles would have to be eliminated and everyone would walk around with their own reusable utensils and plates for restaurants now using plastic and single-use takeout food containers would be banned.
Universities and colleges could ban tail-gate parties at football and other entertainment events as wasteful carbon emitters.
Sports teams would be restricted to train travel and international sporting events would be seriously curtailed.
Foreign tourism would be perhaps reduced to one personal trip every five years.
Most importantly each individual could be given a carbon ration card where the personal limit could not be exceeded and where the rich would not be allowed to buy carbon credits from others.
Every year, as we do today at tax time, everyone would have to declare their carbon footprint and those over the limit would face harsh punishment.
And most importantly every single young woman on Earth would need to commit to bear no more than two children. After all, population is the driving force in the overuse of resources.
Young people in third-world countries would be asked that their society not be allowed to catch up to the west in industrialization.

Does that sound like a viable plan that this Greta generation will willingly adopt?

I somehow doubt that this will happen, because truth be told, the Greta generation is even less altruistic than my generation, or my father's.

As I said before, we have as much chance reducing global warming as we do in ending war in this world.
All the good intentions will not bring about any significant result.

But while climate messiahs describe the horrors of global warming, nobody describes the benefits, which if the old saying that its an ill wind that blows no good is to be believed, must exist somewhere..

We are told warming weather will bring more hurricanes and unsettled weather, an unsubstantiated scare tactic.
We are told that climate warming will lead to animal extinctions when the opposite is true. For every species like polar bears that disappear the warm weather will encourage and nurture many more new life forms.
We are told that hot weather will lead to many worldwide deaths when the reality it is that cold weather today kills five times as many people as warm weather.
We are told that rising sea levels will drown coastal areas which if true is easily controlled by dykes, berms and sand walls. Trust me Miami Beach will not disappear into the ocean, ask the Dutch.

Warmer temperatures are better for humanity than cold, a fact the climate fanatics fail to accept.

Evidence of this is in comparing the mini ice age of the Dark Age to the Renaissance period which enjoyed a hotter climate.
Warmer temperatures mean less burning of fossil fuels to heat homes.

And finally, the loss of equatorial habitat due to an unacceptable rise in temperature is more than offset by the opening up of vast newly liberated territories in northern Canada and Russia.

Yes, Canada will be an infinitely richer country as a result of global warming!

While the Greta generation suffers from climate change derangement syndrome, they'd be better off worrying about things they can control.

Climate is not one of them.

CAQ Continues Quebec Tradition of Anglo Ethnic Cleansing

Bill 101, the French language law was enacted in 1977 by a separatist government as an important first step in the march towards Quebec independence. The father of the law, Dr. Camille Laurin was a rabid anglophobe who planned the law less as a protection for the French language and more as an effort to remove anglophones and their influence from Quebec society, a necessary prerequisite to convincing Quebecers to split from Canada.

Bill 101 has successfully been sold to francophones as a necessary defensive mechanism needed to protect their language and culture from the onslaught of the English and remains massively popular.
Dr. Laurin shrewdly added clauses to the law that were overtly contrary to Canada's founding constitution, the BNA act. The inevitable challenges in the Supreme court and the subsequent defeats were anticipated and designed to bolster francophone resentment of Canada thus fostering a climate of confrontation that would serve separatists in their battle to convince Quebecers that Canada was an impediment to a flourishing Quebec society.

Evil father of Bill 101, hateful Anglophobe Camille Laurin

In this respect Dr. Laurin's plan was diabolically clever and effective, he correctly surmised that the anglos represented a formidable and solid voting block that would stand in the way of a successful referendum. Reducing their numbers was the primary goal of Bill 101, not the protection of the French language..

The law was actually based and sold on two very wrong premises, the first that Quebec was becoming more and more English and secondly that it was the English and ethnic communities who were responsible for the perceived, yet false reality that English was on the upswing and threatening to steamroll the French nature of Quebec.

Let us consider that today's issue of massive immigration to Quebec by those speaking neither English or French wasn't an issue back when Bill 101 was conceived and where only about 20,000 immigrants per year were accepted compared to 50,000 today. Back then Quebec also produced more babies and was growing at a rate of 50,000 people (births minus deaths) locally compared to zero or negative growth today.
Bill 101 was a law conceived to battle a problem that didn't exist.

At any rate,  restrictions were placed on the English language and the English community to the wild rejoicing of nationalists, while the general francophone population accepted the law as a necessary evil employed to forestall Quebec's demise as a French nation.
It wasn't actually that hard to convince the general francophone population that someone else's rights had to be trampled in order to protect theirs.
It's the same scenario employed around the world by ethnic-cleansing governments who first blame the ills of society on certain definable minorities and then place restrictions on those communities to placate and distract the masses.
While some of the tactics employed to rid nations of these pesky threats rise to genocide, other less obvious tactics are employed to disempower or drive out minorities deemed unwanted though restrictive laws that render these minorities, second-class citizens

Ethnic cleansing is the systematic forced removal of ethnic, racial and/or religious groups from a given territory by a more powerful ethnic group, often with the intent of making it ethnically homogeneous. Wikipedia

Every single Quebec government since Bill 101 has enacted or enforced laws that promoted the destruction of the English minority, laws that renders the community so uncomfortable that an exodus to friendlier environs is preferable for many of the young and mobile.
What Anglo Quebec family doesn't count members who have emigrated to greener pastures in other parts of Canada or the USA?
How many times have you heard nationalist leaders tell us that if we don't like Bill 101, we should consider taking Highway 401, the road to Ontario.
Those my friends are the voices of ethnic cleansers who may blanch at being labelled as such, but who fit the bill.

Succeeding Quebec governments, whether separatists or federalists have always professed love for the anglo community but through their action or inaction in the face of Bill 101, have all worked to weaken, undermine,  dislodge and ultimately render the Anglo community numerically impoverished and politically irrelevant.

`The premier (Legault) was asked to define just who is a "historical anglophone," after Immigration Minister Simon Jolin-Barrette, who is also responsible for the protection of the French language, said a new language policy will ensure all ministries and organizations offer public services almost exclusively in French.

The policy should be ready in the coming weeks, Jolin-Barrette said, and will apply to communication with individuals as well as companies.

Nothing will change for the "historic English minority," he explained — they "will always be able to receive all the services in their own language."

"Historic Anglo Minority."

Whenever you hear that phrase, understand that is code, and you are listening or reading an opinion  provided by an ethnic cleanser.

Referring to the historic Anglo minority implies that it is a closed shop, amd nobody can join this community by choice and that immigrants who come to Quebec and their descendants will never be allowed to become Anglophones.

And therein lies the rub.

Consider that both native-born francophone and anglophone numbers are dwindling because of the falling birth rate which can no longer support a stable population.
For anglophones, this problem is infinitely more acute because of emigration by young Anglos fed-up with life in Quebec as well as inter-marriage between francophones and anglophones where two out of three blended families choose to educate their children in French.

While francophones can hope to bolster and restore their numbers through immigration and the forced adaptation of French as their language and culture, Anglophones are by law forbidden to assimilate new immigrants.

By refusing to allow a certain percentage of immigrants to enter the English primary school system, the law assures the gradual destruction of the English community in Quebec.

It is that plain and simple and we have already seen the results over the last thirty years, that is an Anglophone community reduced by half.

Beneath the surface of feigned respect and appreciation of the English in Quebec lies a starker and more sinister picture of francophone Quebec, a society obsessed with its purity, detesting the English and fearful of the necessary evil of impure immigrants who water down pur laine Quebec culture, even if they speak French.

Petty and vindictive, as highlighted by the Bonjour/Hi fiasco, 'pastagate' and more recently, the ruling by bureaucrats that a native French citizen of France did not possess the right stuff for immigration because a tiny portion of her dissertation was written in English (so that it could be published) highlights the underlying official enmity towards the English that is manifest and undeniable.
These are not isolated instances of pettiness but mark the underlying hateful attitude that Quebec governments and bureaucracy holds for the impure.

Such is the rhetoric of Francois Legault and his xenophobic minions, including the French media who heap scorn and disdain upon those not of the tribe.
Make no mistake, the organized assault on the English community is a plan launched by Dr. Laurin and followed and enforced up by every single subsequent Quebec government.

So don't single out Francois Legault and the CAQ for the hateful attitude towards Anglos and Ethnics, he and his party are just continuing the fine tradition of bashing minorities, the only difference being his unabashed zeal and shameful enjoyment of the endeavour.

Would Dr. Camille Laurin be alive today, he would be disappointed that Quebec has failed to gain independence but he'd be overjoyed at the humiliation his law has unleashed on the hated English and the decimation of the community his law has wrought.

Separatists Loving Canada's Bill 21 Opposition

If anything cost Justin Trudeau his majority in the last election, it wasn't Conservative leader Andrew Scheer's bumbling and disconnect with the electorate, it was the ROC's loud and vocal opposition to Quebec's Bill 21, the secular bill, which propelled the Bloc Quebecois back into Parliament with renewed numbers, thus robbing Trudeau of another majority government.

Canada's entitled liberal left did not understand, nor fathom that Bill 21 enjoys broad support in Quebec and that attacking the bill would only propel Quebec's fickle fence-sitting voters into choosing to embrace the Bloc for no other reason but to provide a countervailing political force vis-a-vis Bill 21.
Make no mistake, Canada's prodigious liberal left's righteous and indignant opposition to Bill 21 and its attack on the Quebec government and its constituency led to our minority Parliament, for better or worse.

For myself, I cannot say that I'm dissatisfied with the comeuppance of Canada's liberal left over the issue, particularly the politicians and media who led the vociferous opposition to Quebec's Bill 21, all to no avail.
They are destined to fume and fustigate for years to come over Quebec's refusal to knuckle under to their liberal agenda, dumfounded that their demand for the repeal of the hated law falls on deaf ears in Quebec despite using every weapon in the liberal book, including shaming. humiliating, lecturing and uncontrolled hectoring.

Yesterday the city of Toronto added its two cents by piling on in opposition to Bill 21.

In its motion, Toronto council said it is opposed to the law and endorses an initiative proposed by Calgary city council that asks the Canadian Coalition of Municipalities Against Racism and Discrimination “to create a nationwide campaign that highlights the harmful widespread impacts of Bill 21 on social cohesion and inclusion in Canada.”
Toronto also called on the federal government “to unequivocally condemn and challenge Quebec’s Bill 21.” Link

 Ha! Ha!
For Quebec nationalists and separatists in Quebec, Toronto's opposition and blustering is sweet music to their ears.
Quebec is immune to this intimidation for a variety of reasons, but largely because taking orders or advice from the ROC is the last thing it is interested in doing. In fact, piquing the nose of the perceived smug and superior liberal Anglos in the ROC over the issue is the cherry topping the Bill 21 sundae.
As can be clearly seen by the desperate and toothless remedy proposed, there is nothing to be done politically (at least nothing Trudeau would dare) and so the reality is that Toronto's pain is Quebec's gain as the saying goes.
Quebecers are thoroughly enjoying the pain Bill 21 has inflicted on the ROC and the more Canada howls, the more Quebec remains steadfast and resolute.

For Canada's majorly left-leaning politicians and journalists, Quebec's refusal to knuckle under is all the more galling because of the left's prevailing belief that not only is theirs the only truth, but those who share a different opinion are dead-wrong, stupid, out of touch and inconsequential.

You would think that given the overwhelming unanimous rejection of Bill 21 by politicians and journalists in ROC, it would represent a massive rejection of Bill 22 by Canadians.
But alas it is no so.
Despite calling the law evil, racist unconstitutional and every 




Canada's liberal-minded are in the majority in this country, which is to say that they outnumber conservative-minded folks by a margin of about 65% to 35%. This is just a fact.

And so they control the media, the elected governments and the policies that govern Canada and have done so for decades.
This liberal dominance was broken up by the reign of Stephen Harper who's Conservative government was created by the serendipitous split in liberal vote between the Liberals and the NDP..
That being said, Harper did little to promote a real conservative agenda but rather acted to curb the excesses of wanton liberalism.

With the rise of Justin Trudeau, liberalism has run rampant, the hallmark of which is an overwhelming sense of entitlement and righteousness.
This is the part of liberalism that is most distressing, the dogmatic and fanatical belief that liberalism is the only legitimate political agenda.

Those who oppose the liberal agenda on gay and transgender rights, unbridled defecit spending, abortion, affirmative action for women in the workforce and climate activism are portrayed as regressive, deniers and other pejoratives coined by liberals to paint those who oppose their agenda as evil and regressive.

It is this, more than the policies that is so galling.


wrong and inconsequential

A poll commissioned by CBC News earlier this year found 65 per cent of all Canadians said they agreed with the statement "we have gone too far in accommodating every group in society" -- a view held most strongly in Alberta and Quebec. link


Smug and superior

One Way or Another... Trudeau is Toast

Even praying won't help Justin Trudeau

For those who supported and continue to support the lofty goals of the 2015 Trudeau Liberals, it's a disappointing fall from grace and a nasty betrayal of trust, the failure of the Liberal government to deliver on what it promised landing squarely on the shoulders of Justin Trudeau.

Gaff after gaff has taken its toll on the now dufus Trudeau who can no longer lecture us from the moral high ground over his pet issues like the environment, feminism, equality and climate change.

Gone is his moral superiority that resonated with Canadians in the last election, the disappointment palpable and the betrayal agonizing.
Regardless of what happens, a Liberal or Conservative minority government, Justin Trudeau as Prime Minister or opposition leader is untenable.
While Justin may remain firmly ensconced in his fantasy world, those around him are looking past his tenure as leader with some already planning leadership bids when he inevitably gets dumped.

Make no mistake, although Trudeau has through his actions betrayed those goals and demonstrated that he's a fraud, the Liberal party platform still resonates with enough Canadians that should the Liberals have dumped Trudeau and gone with a new leader they'd have won this election in a cakewalk.
That's right a cakewalk.

I daresay that the Liberal party brain trust would be more than happy to see a Conservative minority government that could be overthrown at will, rather than muddle on in a minority government position led by a completely damaged and discredited Prime Minister Trudeau.

As Trudeau faces his mortality as Prime Minister he is becoming more and more unhinged, making claims and promises that even his most loyal supporters understand to be desperate measures.

His recent warnings that the environment would be the biggest loser under a Conservative government is laughable as if he himself has actually made progress in lowering Canada's emissions.
But my favourite idiotic promise is that he would commit to planting two billion trees to combat climate change.
If as Trudeau promises, the two billion new trees will have a significant impact on our carbon footprint, what of the 320 billion trees that exist in Canada already?

That's right Canada already has 320 billion trees.
In fact, Canada's forests are so large and bountiful that they completely obliterate our carbon footprint and then some. But that fact will  be discussed in another post.

As for the Conservatives, Scheer has demonstrated that he hasn't got the right stuff and aside from traditional Conservative voters, he hasn't moved the needle through a lacklustre campaign and a personality that evokes mediocrity.

The NDP have destroyed themselves with the likeable Jagmeet Singh, whose strong and measured opinions and policies are overshadowed by his turban.
While progressives west of the Quebec border have no problem with the turban, in Quebec and parts to the east,it is toxic.

And then there is Trudeau's position on Quebec's new secularism law that forbids religious displays (read: Muslim) in some government positions.  Trudeau has softly hinted that he may intervene against the law without ever committing to do so, an ambiguous position meant to play to everyone, but in reality, satisfying no one.
This one policy pronouncement has sealed the fate of a potential Liberal majority government by raising the ire of the hitherto silent Quebec nationalist movement. The issue was tailor-made for the Bloc Quebecois and has given new life to the idea that Quebec needs the party to defend its interests in Ottawa. The shift in voter intentions in Quebec is legendary and the rise of the Bloc as a counter to the dastardly multiculturalist Trudeau has caught fire with those Quebec voters who dislike and fear Muslims and Anglophones.
If the Conservatives win a minority they will be propped up by the Bloc with Scheer surely promising Quebec nationalists what he must in order to assure its support.
While it will serve Conservatives in the short run, the appeasement of the Bloc will play out badly in English Canada and be perceived as a naked deal with the devil.

While the destruction of Justin Trudeau will play out, one way or another over the next months, Liberal planners are hoping for sooner than later, so that they can get back to ruling Canada in a majority government in the next election, perhaps a year to eighteen months ahead.

As for predictions here are mine.

• The Bloc Quebecois will sweep virtually all the ridings outside the greater Montreal and Quebec regions which represent about 35 seats.
• The NDP will be lucky to save two seats in Quebec, the unlikely Ruth Ellen Brosseau and Alexandre Boulerice the best hopes.
• The Conservatives will win about ten or fewer seats in Quebec and the Liberal the rest.
• Nationally. the Conservative will win about ten seats more than the Liberals but not enough for a majority government.
• The NDP will win nationally less than than 20 seats and the Greens, well who cares about the Greens
• Look for a defacto coalition government between the Conservatives and the Bloc, which will be opposed by a defacto coalition between the Liberals and the NDP.
• The Conservative government will last less than eighteen months.

Anthony Housefather's History of Dirty Campaign Tricks.

News item:

Quebec Liberal volunteer caught disposing of 

Conservative campaign literature

"A volunteer helping out with the re-election campaign of Quebec Liberal Anthony Housefather was caught disposing of Conservative literature out on the campaign trail.
The incident was witnessed by a Conservative volunteer who happened to be canvassing the same apartment building in Côte Saint-Luc, Que., on Sept. 25. 
Documents shared with CBC News show that the witness claims Housefather was campaigning with several volunteers at the time of the incident.

The Liberals deny the MP himself did anything wrong. Housefather was photographed in the building with his campaign team at the time. A spokesperson for Housefather confirmed a volunteer has been spoken to about this issue.  "Mr. Housefather had no involvement in this incident," spokesperson Daniel Gans wrote in an email, adding the candidate has "addressed the matter directly with the volunteer involved in the incident."  "Moving forward, and in order to prevent this kind of behaviour, Mr. Housefather will be taking steps to ensure all individuals participating in his campaign understand that this behaviour is not acceptable in any way."CBC

Something about the above article piqued my memory.
I checked my email archive for a correspondence I had received from a contact, a person whom I have great respect for and someone who has been a valuable and credible source in the past.
Back in February of this year, he wrote to me about Anthony Housefather and how the Mount-Royal Liberal member of Parliament was caught red-handed destroying campaign posters of the opposing NO camp, way back in 1992 during the referendum on the Charlottetown Accord.

Now I never wrote about it because it was a long time ago when Housefather was a college student and youthful indiscretions can be pardoned. But if the behaviour is repeated, especially when one has become an elected Member of the Canadian Parliament official it begs the questions as to whether the behaviour represents a disturbing pattern.

Here is the story as I've been told;

"Did you know that, in a strange but very possible way, the only reason Anthony Housefather is an MP today is because of the kindness of one {redacted} (yes, THAT {redacted}; we used to be best friends)? Let me explain.{redacted} and I worked on the "No" side in the 1992 Charlottetown Referendum campaign. We were putting up posters around NDG/Cote St. Luc for several hours and an MUCTC bus driver came along in his bus, saw us, and informed us that he saw a young male taking down our posters. He said that if we liked, he would act as a witness to identify the young man if we wanted to press charges. Well, you guessed it: that young man -- whom we then searched out and came upon -- was none other than one Anthony Housefather, then attending undergraduate McGill. We not only confronted him but saw him engaged in the dastardly deed as well. I then discussed with {redacted} whether he wanted to press charges (I, like the bus driver, was willing to) and he declined. I daresay that if {redacted} wanted to proceed with the charges, it is very possible that (1) Housefather would have been convicted; and (2) because of the conviction, he wouldn't have been accepted into McGill Law School; and (3) he never would have become mayor or MP. So in a very weird way, Housefather may have {redacted} to thank for his political career."

I contacted the other party mentioned in the post, who grew tremendously uncomfortable with my questions about the incident.
Clearly a Trudeau supporter, he refused to confirm the story, but interestingly when I told him that I would not run the story if he denied it happened, he refused to say that the story was untrue. Perhaps his loyalty wouldn't allow him to confirm the story but his honesty did not allow him to deny it.
He hemmed and hawed and tried to change the subject but when the question was put to him point blank, he just refused to say yes or no.
I have the Facebook Messenger exchange to prove it.

I wrote Anthony Housefather via his Parliamentary email for comment but he refused to answer at all.
Now a few more details have come to my attention.
The incident happened in Cote-Saint-Luc in the afternoon near Cavendish and Cote Saint Luc Road and other than the bus driver and the two campaign workers involved there is another witness.

And so Housefather's pious affirmation that he hadn't anything to do with his volunteer's dirty trick sounds a bit suspect, considering Housefather was guilty of the exact same offence way back when.
Perhaps its time for a healthy dose of the truth.

Since Housefather has chosen to ignore this lowly blogster, perhaps a higher profile reporter could put the question to him.
After all, constituents have a right to know who their MP is exactly.