Monday, June 6, 2011

Stéphane Dion Back in Fighting Form!

Up until a year ago, you might have thought that Stéphane Dion was just about the worst leader the Liberal Party of Canada ever fielded. As a dark horse who swept into power in the unlikeliest of manner, his storybook ascension to power was followed alas, by a disastrous tenure as leader and a sad and precipitous fall from grace.
Whether it was his poor command of English or the foolish decision to base an electoral campaign on increasing taxes through some sort of green tax, the public wasn't having any of it and so after an electoral disaster he was shown the door rather indelicately.
While the Liberals were glad to see Dion leave, few would have guessed that the next leader, Michael Ignatieff, everything Dion wasn't, would turn out to be infinitely less successful.

One might have assumed that  Dion would fade away politically but he soldiered on and has survived the Liberal massacre of May 2, being returned to Parliament by voters in the Montreal riding of St. Laurent where his ethnic and English base remained more loyal than his Liberal confreres.

In the aftermath of the election slaughter and no prospect of another election for four years, the Liberal party  has announced that it is hunkering down for an extended period of introspection and re-building, even opting to delay the choice of a new leader for eighteen months. And so like a wounded animal that slinks away to lick its wounds, the Liberals have exited the political battlefield and ceded the fight, or so it seems.

Out of  the ashes of the electoral meltdown, Dion has risen like the Phoenix to reclaim past glories when he stood head and shoulders above all, battling the separatists successfully to the point where to Quebec militants, he became the most hated Quebecker since Pierre-Eliot Trudeau.

His successful letter campaign, wherein Dion wrote detailed and exhaustive rebuttals against separatist propaganda in a series of Op-Ed pieces in newspapers across the country, enraged separatists who fumed at the the calm and collected and professorial manner in which he destroyed their positions.

Dion's greatest achievement was the Clarity Act, a law that creates rules for any future referendum. The law allows for separation but only after a clear referendum question is asked and a clear majority is received. 
As much as separatists hate the law, Dion never fails to remind them that it is the law of the land, with the underlying message that to ignore its precepts would mean that the only road to independence would be a unilateral declaration of independence, something almost impossible to sell in Quebec.

Unlike most of his Liberal party cohorts, Dion is not a disheartened or beaten man, his election was a personal triumph, one that he badly needed. Mr. Dion is still in debt vis-a-vis his leadership run and is rumoured to owe over $100,000. His job at $157K guaranteed for another four years will go a long way to assuage the financial stress. Mr. Dion at 55 has just now qualified to receive his Parliamentary pension, but by staying an extra four years (achieving twenty years in Parliament) he will assure himself of a $100K-$150K per year pension when he chooses to retire or is defeated in the next election (not likely.)
With no aspirations to become leader again (been there, done that) Mr. Dion is in a good place, financially secure and free to say and do what he wants.

What he wants to do, is to pursue his political first love, that is to confront separatists and to dispel sovereignist propaganda.
Dion has also correctly identified the Ndp as the real rival to the Liberal Party dream of reclaiming national prominence and as such a convergence of issues and circumstances has placed Jack Layton and the dippers firmly in his cross hairs.

Since Harper and the Conservatives will content themselves to majority rule and leave the political fighting to the boys across the aisle, the only logical battle is the Ndp versus the Liberals and the return of Dion to the fight augers badly for the dippers whose political positions are so eminently attackable, Dion is going to have a field day.

Even snarling Uncle Tom will match up poorly to Dion's calm and deliberate manner and if Mulcair thinks he can bait Dion into a name calling knife fight, he's badly informed.

Here's an example of Dion's intellectual prowess and what the dippers are up against. It's a speech he gave at the 8th Annual Michel Bastarache Conference at the Rideau Club in  February entitled Secession and the Virtues of Clarity.

And so Dion is taking up the fight against Jack Layton, the Ndp and its hypocritical stance on Quebec sovereignty.

Here in a letter to La Press he attacks the idea of 50%+1 being enough of a margin of victory in a referendum LINK{FR}

Here he attacks the separatists hiding in the Quebec wing of the Ndp caucus; 
He [Mr. Layton] should be forced to ask each of its members that they believe in Canada. And if this is not the case, he should say: "I have so many members who are separatists and who would vote " Yes" in a referendum on independence. " He should tell us what he would do, "said Mr. Dion. LINK{FR}
With a majority government before us,  it augers poorly for political debate. The Conservatives have nothing to gain from engaging in partisan debate (for at least three years) and so we might have expected an exceedingly boring time in Ottawa.

Dion has changed all that.
He's set the tone for the debate, chosen an opponent and demarcated the battle lines. It's going to be the Ndp versus the Liberals and the fight is going to be interesting, with the Liberals playing the Canada card and the Ndp forced to defend its Quebec position.

I wouldn't want to be staring down at Dion, his slight professorial bespectacled look belies a tenacious fighter who is just that much smarter and intelligent than his opponents.

Sunday, June 5, 2011

HOUSKEEPING - JUNE

 First, I'd to mention that I finally broke down a opened a TWITTER account and for those disposed to follow me, my address is;
@EditorNoDogs
I promise you that I won't overburden you and will use the messaging for special occasions and to report on Blogger outages or problems. If you've got a Twitter account, I promise to follow you and you can send me private messages as well.

Next I'd like to address those readers, friend and foe who contribute to whatever richness this blog does indeed have through the comment section, which as many readers have said, is more interesting than my missives.

I'm going to tighten up again the rules again in terms of what can and cannot be said. I remain committed that everyone has a right to rant, use strong language and be nasty at times.
But it's got to make sense and it can't be gratuitously simple.
It's okay if you insult somebody, but you've got to make some sort of an argument.

"Joe blow is a moron and and idiot." -NO LONGER ACCEPTABLE.

"Joe Blow is a moron because hes views on such and such are in error and etc. etc." -ACCEPTABLE

General insults about Quebec, Canada, Quebeckers or Canadians remain fair game.
General insults about politicians remain fair game.

As to comments that deal exclusively with orthographical or language, or translation errors, they will no longer be published.
For some of us who write in English or French, which is not our mother tongue, errors will surely crop up. Calling someone out on these errors  adds nothing to the discussion.

Now I'm as guilty as the next. I once called out someone for a orthograpghical error because his/her comment annoyed me. It was wrong thing to do.
That person wrote back to say that they had written the comment early in the morning, on a small hand-held keyboard and as such, should be forgiven any small error.
Absolutely right, I apologize, my bad.

"Learn how to spell dummy.
Its Aerosmith and American. ESL fool, ESL" -NO LONGER ACCEPTABLE.

LETS US ALL AVOID THESE GRATUITOUS 'AD HOMINUM' ATTACKS.

As for errors by this author in the main blog piece, I do appreciate an email that points out syntax, spelling or orthographical errors. This blog is dynamic and people will read the post long after you. I would like these mistakes to be cleared up ASAP and will make the necessary corrections and send you an email of thanks.

Remember, don't use the comments section for this, send an email or a private Tweet!

Again, I want thank all who read this blog, those who read it passively and those who are prolific commenters.

If you are a lurker, try a comment.  A small one to start. Your input is invaluable.

For those who accuse this blog on being racist, anti-Quebec, all I can say that your opinion is your right and whatever this blog is or is not, it's place where your objections will always be published.

Here we offer, the almost unfettered right of free expression.

My inspiration remains another fictional movie character - Howard Beal from the movie NETWORK.

"I'm mad as Hell and I'm not going to take it anymore!!!"

And so I continue to believe that reproducing online, the rage and dissent that exists in our society is a worthwhile endeavour.

Friday, June 3, 2011

No Dogs and Chinese Allowed

Last week a dissatisfied reader complained that he or she found the name of this blog offensive as it was a play on signs that appeared in some isolated Toronto area beaches during the 1930's and 1940's.
 "NO DOG AND NO JEWS'

Let me assure readers that the origin of the name of this blog has got nothing to do with those antisemitic signs. At the time I started up this blog, I was unaware that these type of signs even existed.
Many readers wrote to me to tell me about those "No Dogs" signs, making the same connection as the aforementioned reader with most referring to signs in the Toronto area.
After a bit of research, I did  find mention of these  signs with the strongest source being a reference from a history of Toronto's first synagogues. "One resort posted a sign reading “No Jews and No Dogs. Link

Here's a second reference;   
“In the 30’s Toronto was still very much a British colonial city. English Anglo-Saxon Protestants held power in the city and made 80% (‘31) of Toronto’s population. Many non-British immigrants had been brought to Canada from all over Europe as cheap labourers, and made up a large part of Toronto’s working class. These immigrants were second class citizens and were not granted the same rights as the ‘British’ citizens. The Jewish community was the next largest ethnic group after the British immigrants, making up only 7.2% of the population. Many establishments banned Jews from entering with signs  reading “Gentiles Only” or “No Dogs, No Jews”.
As for these signs appearing in Quebec, I found but one reference actually making mention of it; 
"In addition, some buildings were subject to restrictive covenants that prevented their sale to Jews. Many clubs, beaches and resorts were closed to Jews. There were signs posted that said; 
Interdit aux juifs ou aux chiens,” or   Chrétiens seulement!”. 
 These signs were posted on the golf courses in Halifax at the door of the hotel in the Laurentians, in rural Ontario in the lake region of Manitoba and the resorts of British Columbia ." Link  
I can't say that the evidence is overwhelming that the " No Dogs" signs ever existed in Quebec.

At any rate, this sorry saga of antisemitism has nothing to do with the name of this blog, but rather, the name honours  a scene in my favourite BRUCE LEE Kung Fu movie, 'Fist of Fury,' where Lee's character, suffers from discrimination when as a Chinese, he is refused entrance to a park reserved for native Japanese.

Watch the clip and you will probably understand my motivation;



The scene  is very inspiring (at least for me) especially when Bruce Lee decides to fight back and destroys the very sign which describes the outrageous discrimination.
And so "NO DOGS AND ANGLOPHONES" was born, a play on the sign in the picture at the top of this piece.

Now that the same reader who complained about the blog title thought that this 'type' of blog is counter productive and may actually increase sentiment for sovereignty. As such, he offers, that I'd  be better, helping our community by not publishing these 'inflammatory' ideas.

I'm sorry but I can't agree less.
Writing about the unpopular truths is never something that will be roundly accepted.

This premise of not 'rocking the boat' is what leads, in the most extreme case, to dangerous totalitarian regimes, the likes this world has seen too often.
I'm not suggesting that Quebec is on it's way to such a destination, not at all. But dissenting voices is what keeps governments on its toes and luckily there are plenty of dissenting voices in Quebec, both English and French.

Even a tiny blog like ours contributes to democratic dissent.

Perhaps the greatest lesson of the power of the printed word to bring down the corrupt and evil excesses of government can be taken from the famous open letter. "J'Accuse,"  written by Émile Zola in 1898 indicting the French government's false conviction of French army officer Alfred Dreyfus. Read about the famous Dreyfus  affair

In the end, the government fell, but not before Zola was forced to flee to England because of the pressure put upon him.
Should he have given up and not rocked the boat?

I don't equate myself to Emile Zola, but his heroic and lonely battle that he waged at great personal expense, in a successful effort to the propagate the truth in the face of so much hatred and scorn, inspires me, as it should you.
Zola teaches us that the few may be right and the many may be wrong. He teaches about perseverance and faith. He teaches us that we must not give up our principles and never stop fighting for what we believe in.
Most importantly, Zola teaches us that the few  can prevail.

And so we should not be afraid to offer dissent, especially considering that in doing so, here in Quebec and Canada, we do not place ourselves in any great danger as those who fought for their rights in the past.
Those who refuse to offer dissent out of fear, forfeit their right to complain.

And so my choice of the name of this blog was not based on the humiliating antisemitic signs of the past.
It is inspired by a movie, where the hero decides to fight back against unjust discrimination, his determination and prowess inspiring and uplifting.

Thursday, June 2, 2011

The Queen Versus Amir Khadir

Time permitting Amir Khadir has promised to take part in the demonstration planned to protest the Royal visit next month by Prince William and Kate and of course, we'd expect no less.

For Khadir there's nothing like a good demonstration, to get his blood circulating. Ever since he was a little boy his father, a Communist organizer dragged him to one demonstration after another, fighting for the downtrodden proletariat, and like a Jehovah's Witness canvasser, after a while, it becomes second nature, an accustomed way of life. 

And so while Christians are slaughtered in Egypt, while Syrian children are cut down by their own soldiers and while Colonel Qaddafi masterminds a slaughter of his own people, it's the Royals and a poor shoe seller on St. Denis Street in Montreal who are the targets of this very brave, self-righteous and honourable politician. 

Mr. Khadir is renowned for his clever sloganeering and his repeated use of libelous untruths to further his message of peace, love and communism socialism, where in his idyllic Shangri-la, the world is free from big business, bosses, rich people, pollution, Jews, Americans and of course--  the Queen of England.

"PARASITES!" was the headline that made it's way across the ocean to the pages of the Daily Mail, where Mr. Khadir's reference to the Royals, didn't go over big. The paper quoted a Calgary reader of the National Post as saying "As for Quebec, the less said the better with those constant leeches on the rest of Canada.' LINK

I'm not a great fan of the Royals but respect those who get a great deal of enjoyment out of the Monarchy. That being said, it behooves me to defend the Royals when Mr. Khadirs slanders them gratuitously.
The Royals may be a lot of things but parasites they are not.
In fact they work very hard at their job and pursue their duties with dedication and good grace. What exactly is their job? To bring joy to those who are interested and trust me, there are plenty of Canadians who are interested. 

Visiting the ill, opening a new road or hospital, trouping the colours, touring disaster zones, giving out awards, hosting garden parties for thousands, shaking hands and waving are all part of the Royal duties that the Queen and her family do, day in and day out.
Does Mr. Khadir really believe William and Kate are coming to visit Yellowknife for a vacation that we are paying for?
Lady Diana, during her shortened life worked tirelessly on various charities and almost single-handed brought the issue of land-mines to world attention. It is a legacy that Kate has committed to continue.

As for costs, forget it, the Royals are a bargain beyond belief. 
Half of Britain's tourism industry is based on the Royal Family. The Changing of the Guard, the Tower of London and even Buckingham Palace, which you can actually visit in the summer, are driving forces that keep visitors coming to London.
The Royal wedding of William and Kate, which did cost the state tens of millions of pounds in security (the Royal family paid for the actual wedding) was worth BILLIONS in new tourist dollars.

As for Canada, each of us contributes about a buck-fifty as our part of the Royal upkeep bill, not a heckuva lot of money and well worth it when one considers the pleasure some Canadians derive from the Royal Family.

Even if it is only 10% or 20% who do enjoy these Royal visits, the money is piddling. Consider all the other subsidies we provide for, the arts programs that few people partake, Telefilm Canada, CBC, Radio Canada, theatres and art gallery subsidies, billions and billions spent on culture that most of us don't want.
So Mr Khadir objects to the $1.50 each of us spends on the Royals, so much so that is is worth demonstrating over.
There are things most of us also object to, perhaps Canadians can organize a demonstration to voice our disapproval over the $200.00 each and every Canadian is forced to cough up to pay for  Quebec's equalization payment. Yup, 200 bucks, not a $1.50!

Mr. Khadir may hate the Royals for many reasons, but when he calls them parasites he is out of bounds, because it is simply not true.
At any rate, I don't believe the opinion polls that say that few Canadians support the Monarchy because it's probably a little embarrassing to admit such a sugary attachment, akin to admitting that you enjoy fan magazines and that you secretly follow the lives of Brangelina,  George Clooney and the ever-talented Kardashian clan.

If nobody was interested in the Royal family, why did a gazillion people watch the Royal wedding world-wide? 
In Canada over 5 million people, over 38% of us, watched some or all of the Royal wedding!
Even separatists and militants watched the wedding because for many it was wonderful entertainment, pure and simple.


For many of us the Royal Family is a delicious real-life fantasy. Like a romance movie full of princes and princesses, costumes and palaces. Adult fantasy, just like Avatar the movie!


So Mr. Khadir, huff and puff all you want. Demonstrate your outrage and scorn with the other merry idiots who believe that the Royal Family is something worth demonstrating over. The Royals as enemies of Quebec is so passé, that most sovereignist organizations have given up protesting long ago.

In English we call people like you a- 'spoil-sport,' someone who takes joy ruining other people's pleasure.
In you are a separatist, the British royal family is as relevant to you as is the Swedish or Dutch Royal family. All the demonstration achieves is to ruin the fun of others, which I imagine, is precisely the goal.
For Amir Khadir, the RRQ and the SSJB knuckleheads, pissing in someone else's soup is an achievement they can be rightfully ashamed of.

Further reading:

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Quebec's Constitutional Demands?

BUSTED!
Yesterday I tried to show some balance and played devil's advocate in regards to changes in Canada's Parliamentary makeup to somehow satisfy Quebec's minority position.
I touched on the possibility of amending Canada's constitution and opined that perhaps Quebec would be more amenable to compromise in light of the province's deteriorating demographic position, perhaps ready to accept the old saw that half a loaf of bread is better than none.

I didn't expect commenters to agree with me but what I didn't expect was to be the beneficiary of a double whammy. An article in Le Devoir  proved my hopeful scenario to be hopelessly naive and unrealistic.  

I came across this piece written by Claude Morin, the old Pekist minster (and RCMP informant and his take on what a constitutional  accord would require in order to satisfy Quebec's basic demands. I thought it would be of interest to readers and so here's a translation. I'll save my comments until after you've read it.
TAKING THE NDP AT ITS WORD
"Through the  media we have learned that Jack Layton and Thomas Mulcair had delivered a speech with a "nationalist flavor" at the meeting of General Council of the NDP-Quebec in Montreal last Saturday. They announced that they would recognize as valid, the results of a referendum win with a margin of 50% + 1 and in general, would be ready to defend the interests of Quebec against the rest of Canada.

Excellent arrangements, but a little lacking. So I thought to present a memorandum containing a list of reforms, that when implemented, would contribute greatly to what is called the "cultural and linguistic security of Quebecers." It will be interesting to know fairly quickly if they support all these reforms, or only some of them and, if so, why they would reject this or that. Here is the list:

The Constitution, Basic Law of Canada should:

  • Formally recognize the Quebec nation (nothing cosmetic, Quebec would be regarded not as a province, but as the homeland of a people); 
  • State that this recognition is meant to foster a new more constructive Quebec-Canada relationship; 
  • It would prescribe, that in the case of dispute, the division of jurisdictional powers between Ottawa and Quebec and the allocation of fiscal resources be shared; 
  • Confirm the power of Quebec over its economic, social and cultural activities; 
  • Confirm that Quebec is master of its own affairs in areas that it already enjoys under the current constitution (it should go without saying, but would be better to confirm); 
  • Assert that the territory of Quebec is inviolate, and it is for Quebecers to determine their own future and their policies on citizenship and immigration; 
  • Clarify that this control extends to the realm of language (where Quebec's jurisdictions have been unilaterally reduced by the federal government and other provinces during the constitutional repatriation of 1982); 
  • Stipulate that Quebec would define the application of federal powers and spending in areas under its jurisdiction (with the right to compensation if Quebec opts out of new national programs); 
  • Confer on Quebec in its fields of competence, the right to represent itself abroad, as well as to speak and engage in its own name, in some international forums, and have its own representation in international sporting competitions; 
  • Provide for the participation of Quebec in appointing Quebec members of the Supreme Court and Senate; 
  • Ensure, finally, that once enshrined in the Constitution these new provisions would be modified only with the consent of the National Assembly of Quebec."
Claude Morin - Former Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs of Quebec- LINK {FR}
.....sigh
Actually what I think what Mr. Morin is describing is Sovereignty-Association.
About the only thing that Mr. Morin wants Quebec to maintain in its relationship with Canada is EQUALIZATION PAYMENTS! 

I am reminded of the fictional character "The Black Knight"in the film Monty Python and the Holy Grail. As the Black knight battles to defend a bridge, he is hacked up, piecemeal by King Arthur. As he continues to lose limb after limb, his bravado increases. Watch the clip on YouTube.
At any rate, it seems to me that Mr. Morin remains as deluded as the Black Knight and that his position is just as ridiculous. As Quebec's demographic and economic position decreases, its demands increase!
What the PQ couldn't win after thirty-five years of militancy and two referendums, Mr. Morin expects Ottawa to give away for free. ...argh!....