tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post3227864206190965430..comments2024-02-17T03:22:53.951-05:00Comments on No Dogs or Anglophones: Are Quebeckers Being Brainwashed?- Part ThreeEditorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05699783315783642466noreply@blogger.comBlogger94125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-64040169738689725102011-03-28T15:50:03.567-04:002011-03-28T15:50:03.567-04:00Kiki et Jasonne forment un joli couple.
C'est ...Kiki et Jasonne forment un joli couple.<br />C'est bien de défendre son petit copain...Grrrrr!Dog killer from Westnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-30367963911547666702011-03-25T08:52:43.053-04:002011-03-25T08:52:43.053-04:00"Force Quebec?Ils sont morts dans l'oeuf...."Force Quebec?Ils sont morts dans l'oeuf.Vous ne suivez pas l'actualité Québécoise Jasonne?"<br /><br />That was exactly my point you retard. The point was that parties pop up and die all the time. And love the extra "ne" on the end of my name. Very 3rd grade of you.<br /><br />"En passant mon commentaire s'adressait a kiki,a moins que vous ne soyez devenu la police morale de ce blogue,je vous suggère de répondre aux commentaires qui vous sont adressés."<br /><br />I can talk to who I want when I want thank you very much. And his name is adski by the way you illiterate clown. Oh no wait. You misspelt it on purpose thinking it was terribly clever didn't you? Classic 3rd grade humour again. Any other child-like qualities you wish to share with us?Jason the Montreal Anglohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01676354763087088744noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-87158981090046849422011-03-23T10:41:48.166-04:002011-03-23T10:41:48.166-04:00Force Quebec?Ils sont morts dans l'oeuf.Vous n...Force Quebec?Ils sont morts dans l'oeuf.Vous ne suivez pas l'actualité Québécoise Jasonne?<br />En passant mon commentaire s'adressait a kiki,a moins que vous ne soyez devenu la police morale de ce blogue,je vous suggère de répondre aux commentaires qui vous sont adressés.Press 9noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-56036951834556082942011-03-23T09:03:56.131-04:002011-03-23T09:03:56.131-04:00"Kiki est fâché?"
Word distortion used ..."Kiki est fâché?"<br /><br />Word distortion used for lame name calling. See already we know we're dealing with someone with the maturity of a schoolyarder.<br /><br />"WOooooouuuuu...!"<br /><br />This is the type of thing 12-year-old kids write on youtube when they get in an argument with another poster. If your comment had any substance you wouldn't need useless filler like this.<br /><br />"Alors comment epliquez-vous l'arrivée prochaine de 2 partis indépendantistes au Québec" <br /><br />How do YOU explain Force Quebec then? New parties emerge and die all the time dude. And as I've said on another post, Charest getting kicked out has nothing to do with the sovereignty tendency of Quebec and everything to do with Charest's own incompetence.<br /><br />"Votre théorie ne tient pas la route,désolé!"'<br /><br />I don't think you should be critiquing others' theories. I'm sorry but somebody who posts a poorly photoshopped map of the world as evidence of something doesn't really hold much credibility.Jason the Montreal Anglohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01676354763087088744noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-26400634827176961122011-03-22T13:46:09.434-04:002011-03-22T13:46:09.434-04:00Kiki est fâché?WOooooouuuuu...!Alors comment epliq...Kiki est fâché?WOooooouuuuu...!Alors comment epliquez-vous l'arrivée prochaine de 2 partis indépendantistes au Québec?WOuuuuu....!<br />Votre théorie ne tient pas la route,désolé!Press 9noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-50016299684125192732011-03-22T11:56:21.087-04:002011-03-22T11:56:21.087-04:00Looking at Quebec by population density gives you ...Looking at Quebec by population density gives you a better perspective and makes the seppies look even more ridiculous. If you ignore the red below and around the great lakes (which is US and Ontario), you end up with two red dots for the province of Quebec, one for Montreal and one for Quebec City, with patches of faint red in between the two cities, and some to the west and the east.<br /><br />http://www.learnquebec.ca/export/sites/learn/en/content/curriculum/social_sciences/sec_geography/resources/metropolises/metropole_images/carte_densite_quebec.jpg<br /><br />http://www.learnquebec.ca/en/content/curriculum/social_sciences/sec_geography/resources/metropolises/montreal.html<br /><br />So that’s what the seppies want to use to create a country. A mostly federalist city that’s increasingly (due to immigration) hostile to the idea of secession, plus a couple million farmers from the Regions.<br /><br />A great country that would be indeed. (No wonder that they haven’t separated yet).adskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04196014962059056067noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-21456772642872572672011-03-21T21:59:56.485-04:002011-03-21T21:59:56.485-04:00"Cela représente le rêve de la moitié des Qué..."Cela représente le rêve de la moitié des Québécois...Les vrais"<br /><br />Less than half of Quebecers are separatists at the moment. I almost fell out of my chair when I saw their dream of a Quebec state including parts of Ontario, including Toronto LMAOOOOOOAnglo Montrealernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-29189723203439082862011-03-21T21:48:13.246-04:002011-03-21T21:48:13.246-04:00"Did you seriously just link a poorly photosh..."Did you seriously just link a poorly photoshopped map on photobucket as evidence of something"<br /><br />It's funny how parts of Labrador and Ontario are included in the map of Quebec. Whoever made it is not very geographically astute.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-80145953202445760432011-03-21T19:53:58.230-04:002011-03-21T19:53:58.230-04:00"Did you seriously just link a poorly photosh..."Did you seriously just link a poorly photoshopped map on photobucket as evidence of something?"<br /><br />Cela représente le rêve de la moitié des Québécois...Les vrais.Press 9noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-42679462020416033002011-03-21T15:31:34.141-04:002011-03-21T15:31:34.141-04:00"Et voila!
http://s1201.photobucket.com/albu..."Et voila!<br /><br />http://s1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb352/interima/?action=view&current=Kids-World-Map.jpg<br /><br />Si vous avez d'autres questions d'ordre géographique,n'hésitez surtout pas."<br /><br />Did you seriously just link a poorly photoshopped map on photobucket as evidence of something?Jason the Montreal Anglohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01676354763087088744noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-60492093154705428382011-03-21T11:29:47.949-04:002011-03-21T11:29:47.949-04:00Apparatchik, I appreciate your commitment to Trude...Apparatchik, I appreciate your commitment to Trudeau’s vision of Canada. I, for one, am happy to see another attempt at social engineering (so typical of socialism) fail, as evidenced by low rates of bilingualism across the RoC (that Trudeau once decided should be completely bilingual), and high rates of bilingualism in Montreal (that Levesque once decided should be monolingual).<br /><br />But let’s not kid ourselves. This country is still together only because the Quebecois sold their ideals for 8 billion pieces of silver, while the rest of the country was not aware of all the intricacies involved in Ottawa’s handling of the Quebec issue. If only they knew, there might not have been a pro-Canada rally in downtown Montreal in 1995.<br /><br />Regarding our “founding fathers”, they were all pawns. Canada was a British colony at the time, and all the pertinent decisions were made in London, England. In the meantime, the real founding fathers were busy founding a real nation south of our border.<br /><br />I’ll admit that this country had a great potential back in the 1950’s. It could be a great country today if it took the right turn when it found itself at a crossroads. The right turn would have been a complete dissociation from Quebec and letting it be what it wants to be without a penny of contribution from the rest of the country. Canada, in the meantime, should have rallied around its commitment to small government, and remain fiscally conservative and economically liberal. <br /><br />But it didn’t take the right turn. Today, Canada is nothing but a socialist republic with big, arrogant, and intrusive government, the population taxed to the bone, a nation state of Quebec now a permanent fixture to be constantly appeased and nursed financially, and expensive social engineering schemes draining the budget. Not too mention an army of bureaucrats that contribute nothing to our everyday lives.adskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04196014962059056067noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-383925093486954052011-03-21T01:08:42.167-04:002011-03-21T01:08:42.167-04:00> Foreign aid, for one, is not granted by one s...> Foreign aid, for one, is not granted by one state to another on regular annual basis, and it’s never granted as a result of some backdoor political deal, or as a pay-off to keep someone happy.<br /><br />In theory it isn’t (and shouldn’t), but in practice, I think it’s practically the rule and not the exception. Call me cynical, but I call ‘em like I see ‘em.<br /><br />And I see no reason for America to have given billions for years to strongmen in places like Egypt or Pakistan or even Israel if it didn’t serve some kind of political, military, economic, or other generally strategic objective. The Marshall Plan was certainly aimed at helping post-WWII Europe. But (perhaps more cynically, I ask) what stake did America have in rebuilding Western Europe if not to ultimately have viable trading partners that it could maintain within its own (i.e. non-Soviet) sphere of influence?<br /><br />At the same time, I don’t think that conflating federal transfers with foreign aid is entirely apt, since the system was practically designed to work this way from the get-go. It becomes extortion when we literally demand a few billion dollars up front or we’ll make the government fall…<br /><br />> I think that in the current scheme, both Canada and Quebec are losers to a certain extent.<br /><br />They’re only losers inasmuch as they’ve been unable to capitalize on what could be better exploited as assets.<br /><br />> Both need each other, for different reasons – Quebec for its economy and Canada for its territorial integrity […]<br /><br />True, but this compromise (interestingly, I think) hasn’t changed much since Confederation. In fact, if Canada has a federative structure at all, it’s because our French-Canadian forefathers believed it was the only way to preserve their language and culture. Canada could easily have had an internal structure like France or Britain had our founders not expressly recognized the need to satisfy Quebec in this way. Which kind of brings me to your last point.<br /><br />> […] both lose – Canada, financially and by living in constant uncertainty, and Quebec by never realizing its desire for statehood.<br /><br />English Canada is filled with regional variety just as Quebec is. Toronto is nothing like Flin Flon, and St Tite is nothing like Montreal. Toronto has certain overlaps with Montreal, just as Kuujjuaq shares certain things in common with Iqaluit.<br /><br />A deeper examination needs to be done – both collectively as well as individually – on what this country is about. And it needs to be done in the most un-partisan way possible.<br /><br />Quebec has been umming and awing over independence for a long time, which means its supposed desire for statehood is neither as necessary nor as urgent as proponents have periodically claimed. “Sh*t or get off the can” isn’t even the right expression after 250 years. English Canada fares no better with its own attempts to inspire some kind of non-kitschy Canadiana that is both distinct from Uncle Sam and believable enough not to sound as though it’s trying so hard it must be compensating for something awfully tiny.<br /><br />In the end some will say that it is because both sides are at different stages of some national consciousness that the two are irreconcilable or that without some well-concocted noble lie that successfully fosters deep patriotism while rallying us around universal symbols that we are doomed to certain schism. <br /><br />I think that’s a load of crap. We can choose what unites us and what divides us. And I submit to you that it’s hardly as much about language or geography alone as certain pundits and party strategists with a program to pitch and peddle will have us believe.Apparatchiknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-11410859164244162832011-03-20T22:37:55.421-04:002011-03-20T22:37:55.421-04:00Apparatchik, you’re right, you did address the pol...Apparatchik, you’re right, you did address the policing powers of the OQLF later in your post. My bad.<br /><br />Re: the foreign aid analogy, it’s sort of like this, but not quite. Foreign aid, for one, is not granted by one state to another on regular annual basis, and it’s never granted as a result of some backdoor political deal, or as a pay-off to keep someone happy.<br /><br />I think that in the current scheme, both Canada and Quebec are losers to a certain extent. Both need each other, for different reasons – Quebec for its economy and Canada for its territorial integrity, but both lose – Canada, financially and by living in constant uncertainty, and Quebec by never realizing its desire for statehood.adskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04196014962059056067noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-11285621131030428712011-03-20T21:13:13.540-04:002011-03-20T21:13:13.540-04:00"It doesn’t happen anywhere, except in Canada..."It doesn’t happen anywhere, except in Canada."<br /><br />Pas pour rien que vous êtes le meilleur pays au monde sans oublier votre légendaire générosité.<br />Moi je crie haut et fort "Vive le Canada!".Indigènenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-22988151642665733722011-03-20T21:10:33.461-04:002011-03-20T21:10:33.461-04:00> Really? Does the “necessary and important” pa...> Really? Does the “necessary and important” part include the policing powers of the OQLF […]<br /><br />Your perspicacity is usually spot on; I’m floored that you didn’t read my paragraph through to the end, in which I write:<br />“ […] Mais débarquons au plus sacrant ces inspecteurs qui se promènent rubans à mesurer en main pour s’assurer que la grosseur des caractères qui apparaissent sur des affiches « dans une autre langue » ne contreviennent pas au ratio sacrosaint. ”<br /><br />> Imagine Germany wiring 8 billion $ each year to France? Brazil funneling 8 billion to Argentina? Japan donating 8 billion to Korea? It doesn’t happen anywhere, except in Canada.<br /><br />Actually, it happens all over the world. It’s called foreign aid, and it’s the practice whereby a donor country voluntarily transfers money or other resources to another. When it’s done to the tune of billions of dollars a year, one wonders whether a less respectful name for the practice might be more fitting… [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_policy_of_the_United_States#Aid]<br /><br />> The price you have to pay is that you have no currency, no citizenship, no army, no seat at the UN, and no presence on the map […]<br /><br />… thus feeding directly into the neat paradigm of perpetual self-victimization required to secure a good showing at the next election. <br /><br />When you think about it, it’s actually a no-lose proposition if your objective is to ensconce yourself into a cushy job with sweet benefits and minimum accountability. The Bloc Québécois, to name but one example, has been riding that gravy train for twenty years now killing any effective representation of our demographic and democratic weight to form and hold influence within a Federal government. Instead of being called out on the their charade by an often unforgiving electorate, they’re still able to adequately convince just over three out of eight Quebecers to keep allowing them to do more of the same. <br /><br />(I can already hear the cranky guy from Mississauga chiming in in my mind who would repeat for the umpteenth time how a Canada-first party with a get-tough-on-Quebec-approach is what’s called for.) <br /><br />> Even in Quebec, the non-Francophones treat you as a minority.<br /><br />Make that the non-separatists. <br /><br />And there’s nothing wrong with being a minority, so maybe a term that expresses your dismissive derision on the specific dogma being talked about would be better suited here.<br /><br />I say this as a part ethnic French-Canadian (who isn’t ashamed to use the label), who doesn’t feel like a minority. Then again I don’t spend much time thinking about how French or English or “Other” I feel or am labeled by others on a given day. I go earn money instead – in multiple languages – and am grateful that this is still a great place to do it.Apparatchiknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-60007824150499449902011-03-20T21:07:32.503-04:002011-03-20T21:07:32.503-04:00"At least you admit that you have perpetrated..."At least you admit that you have perpetrated a sort of a scam."<br /><br />Not a sort of scam...A scam.Press 9noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-42108958388390319102011-03-20T21:05:08.533-04:002011-03-20T21:05:08.533-04:00"The type where one country sends another cou..."The type where one country sends another country 8 billion $ a year without getting anything in return."<br /><br />Vous auriez dû nous laisser partir en 1995 mais au lieu de ça,vous êtes sortis dans la rue a grand coup de "nous vous aimons" et bien payez maintenant!De plus 8 milliards pour s'acheter un peu de prestige,ça représente quoi après tout?Press 9noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-24107930576769800272011-03-20T18:13:42.226-04:002011-03-20T18:13:42.226-04:00“Nous sommes un pays avec ses propres règles et av...“Nous sommes un pays avec ses propres règles et avons conservé les avantages d'une province avec les bénéfices financiers qu'elle procure.Mais shhhhh!Ne le dites a personne,d'autres pourraient vouloir nous imiter....Shhhhh!”<br /><br />At least you admit that you have perpetrated a sort of a scam. The type where one country sends another country 8 billion $ a year without getting anything in return. Imagine Germany wiring 8 billion $ each year to France? Brazil funneling 8 billion to Argentina? Japan donating 8 billion to Korea? It doesn’t happen anywhere, except in Canada.<br /><br />But look at the downside. The price you have to pay is that you have no currency, no citizenship, no army, no seat at the UN, and no presence on the map. And this means that nobody beyond Canada even knows about you, and nobody within Canada takes you seriously. Even in Quebec, the non-Francophones treat you as a minority. <br /><br />In the current set up, you may think that you are a country that screwed another country in into funding it, but in fact you are nothing but a minority. A privileged minority, I’ll give you that, but a minority nonetheless, and that’s how you are seen and treated. So don’t come crying that nobody takes you seriously.<br /><br />---<br /><br />“Gardons en place l’Office Québécois de la langue française pour tout ce qui est terminologie – il s’agit d’un travail important et nécessaire à la survie du français que d’assurer que le lexique réponde aux besoins changeants et grandissants de la société.”<br /><br />Really? Does the “necessary and important” part include the policing powers of the OQLF, which give it the right to raid school boards and cite them for English keyboards? Raid pubs, small business? To be a governmental agency set up to nurse the insecurities of the populace at the expense of the taxpayer? C’mon.adskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04196014962059056067noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-47405730903303740142011-03-19T17:26:22.222-04:002011-03-19T17:26:22.222-04:00> Je répète ma question : Que faites vous donc ...> Je répète ma question : Que faites vous donc ici?<br /><br />Votre question serait intéressante quoiqu’elle soit en même temps fort offensante. <br /><br />En deux mots : j’habite ici. Vous aussi semblez vouloir changer notre société afin qu’elle se rende officiellement moins Canadienne et plus à votre image. Moi aussi j’ai le droit de vouloir la rendre plus fière des atouts dont elle jouit, ce qui est mon droit. Jamais je n’aurais osé vous demander pourquoi vous n’alliez pas vivre en France si vraiment votre désir était de vivre dans un vrai pays francophone. <br /><br />Mon pays, c’est le Canada. Le Québec, c’est au Canada. Et Montréal (là où j’habite), c’est à la fois au Québec et au Canada. Je ne souhaite pas vivre dans un univers unilingue (loin de là !), que ce soit anglophone ou francophone. <br /><br />Je préconise tout simplement une refonte de notre législation linguistique sur la base de l’égalité de deux grandes langues. Gardons en place l’Office Québécois de la langue française pour tout ce qui est terminologie – il s’agit d’un travail important et nécessaire à la survie du français que d’assurer que le lexique réponde aux besoins changeants et grandissants de la société. Mais débarquons au plus sacrant ces inspecteurs qui se promènent rubans à mesurer en main pour s’assurer que la grosseur des caractères qui apparaissent sur des affiches « dans une autre langue » ne contreviennent pas au ratio sacrosaint. <br /><br />> Est-ce que je vais aller m'installer en ontario et chiâler,perdre mon énergie (pour une cause perdue d'avance) le reste ma vie parcequ'ils ne parlent pas assez Français?<br /><br />Je n’en sais rien. Mais vous semblez chialer et perdre votre énergie à votre tour pour donner désespérément crédibilité à une cause perdue d’avance. Au Québec, environ 80% des habitants sont francophone depuis même les jours où Montréal était la métropole du pays et dirigée par une bourgeoisie anglo-écossaise dont vous semblez toujours craindre le spectre. D’abord on craignait les sauvages amérindiens. Ensuite il fallait craindre les anglos. La dernière lubie semble vouloir qu’on craigne une « déloyauté » de la part des immigrants venus s’établir ici. On craint, on craint, on craint. Si on craignait notre propre ignorance et petitesse comme on craint (à raison) les gaz de schiste, on serait mieux partis.<br /><br />Montréal s’anglicise ? Peut-être. En même temps, il s’arabise, se hispanise, se pendjabise, se vietnamise, se sinise, s’islamise, se hindouise… bref, il se pluralise. Et on se doit non seulement de s’ouvrir à ces nouvelles gens, mais aussi de s’ouvrir au monde. Il faut aligner les astres. Et ça passe par accorder le respect égal qui revient naturellement à nos deux langues mondiales d’envergure.<br /><br /><br />> Si vous avez d'autres questions d'ordre géographique,n'hésitez surtout pas.<br /><br />Créativité et révisionnisme (pour ne pas dire hallucinations) séparatistes en matière de géographie et d’histoire semblent aller de pair. Après avoir passé par supercherie et jeu d’émotion, les séparatistes constateront qu’il est tout aussi difficile de faire gober un pays imaginaire créé à l’aide de Photoshop à ceux qui ont peu de patience pour leurs niaiseries.<br /> <br /><br />> Never see two english guys debate in French on this blog.Are we really living in a bilingual country ?<br /><br />Never seen two French guys debate in English over at Louis Préfontaine’s either. Hmm…Apparatchiknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-18761139506112166062011-03-19T03:02:35.144-04:002011-03-19T03:02:35.144-04:00Correction. In my first post, I meant to say: &quo...Correction. In my first post, I meant to say: "just like I would rather be attacked by terrorists on a daily basis than surrender any of my rights for a " security" legislation."Anglo Montrealernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-57789287016430264862011-03-19T00:58:05.337-04:002011-03-19T00:58:05.337-04:002/2
Mr. Editor, in order to truly expose these et...2/2<br /><br />Mr. Editor, in order to truly expose these ethnocentric nationalist, fascist Nazis, is to debunk their most repeated claims which have over the years become an indisputable truth. <br /><br />We all know that the French language was never in danger prior to Bill 101. The Gendron Commission, which was the foster chil for Bou Bou's Bill 22 and later Bill 101, claims that French Quebecers spoke English as much as French at work, sometimes even more, but this is because they worked with a global clientele, rather than a local Quebec one. It also stated that the language was nowhere near in danger among French Quebecers and the only reason most immigrants adapted to the English speaking community is, as you point out in your video, because they did not have a choice! The Catholic Church would not permit non-Catholics from attending French schools. If the seppies want to blame anyone, it should be the Roman Catholic church for having misled them for centuries, for discouraging them to take part in the economy and their destiny is to be a farmer population. Mr. Editor, I think a greater documentation of these facts need to be shown on this blog. <br /><br />Figured show that in 1970 11% of signs were in English only and 35% of signs were in French only:<br />"A 1970 survey by Guy Labelle estimated that 35% of the commercial signs in metropolitan Montreal were in French only and 11.8% in English only"<br />-Marc V. Levine, "The Reconquest of Montreal: Language Policy and Social Change in a Bilingual City", page 200<br /><br />It's so sad, really, that Quebec chose the way of coercion in order to achieve its goals to maintain a French face for Quebec, to create classes of citizens and discrimination based on language. Quebec is North America's most backwater society with no improvement in sight.Anglo Montrealernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-4012871773833551162011-03-19T00:15:41.852-04:002011-03-19T00:15:41.852-04:001/2
You know, Bill 101 can in many ways be compar...1/2<br /><br />You know, Bill 101 can in many ways be compared to racial segregation in the United States prior to the civil rights movement. For instance, when we see "bilingual" signs anywhere in Quebec, French is usually bigger, right? Well, in my view, this can be compared to the old law in Alabama in which blacks had to sit on the back of the bus. People could have argued (and I think they have, actually)"does your sitting position really matter? I mean, you'll be getting to your destination anyways, no?" Regarding bilingual signs, one can just say "Why does it matter that French has to be predominant? I mean, at least you're allowed to post another language of your choice!". Brent Tyler has called this "The Rosa Parks Syndrome".<br /><br />This dogma of "protecting the French language" is just like when whites used to justify racial segregation by claiming that the white race needed to be purified and reserved or the ultra-conservative Hispanophobes in the US who keep telling us that they're taking away all the jobs away from Americans. Ethnocentrism should never be tolerated, EVER!That's right you septards, I just compared you to white supremacists in the Confederacy<br /><br />EVEN if French truly was in danger, I would rather see a language die than to give up a freedom protecting it, just like I'd rather be attacked by terrorists on a daily basis rather than any of my rights to a "security" legislation.Anglo Montrealernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-24901690328379593372011-03-19T00:11:08.657-04:002011-03-19T00:11:08.657-04:00No i'm not a babyboomer and i don't drink ...No i'm not a babyboomer and i don't drink any beer at all,thanks.Also i'm wondering why two French guys like us have a discussion in english...Weird hey?<br />Never see two english guys debate in French on this blog.Are we really living in a bilingual country ?AngloBusternoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-628616451270770342011-03-18T22:09:03.526-04:002011-03-18T22:09:03.526-04:00@Jason
I hope to be able to pay you a beer at &qu...@Jason<br /><br />I hope to be able to pay you a beer at "Cheval Blanc" one day.<br /><br />@AngloBuster<br />Maybe, but most people around here are Lazy Bums. I've been fairly active arguing and giving shit to "Ministère de la famille". I'm probably more implicated in the well being of the kids than you'll ever be.<br /><br />I'm just sick of the system.<br /><br />I don't know how old you are, but, I'll move out before being scammed by RRQ. If you are a babyboomer, I hope the buffet will be nice enough. Don't forget to lick the plates before leving so you are sure we get nothing.<br /><br />i'd pay you a beer, but you sound like a Molson drinker.Moofohttp://www.moofo.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7963035472241877292.post-43025517206911595412011-03-18T20:20:50.041-04:002011-03-18T20:20:50.041-04:00"...please work and pay taxes..."
Je tr..."...please work and pay taxes..."<br /><br />Je travaille Depuis plus de 20 ans et j'ai créé ma propre entreprise.Ne vous en faites pas je paye mes taxes et mes impôts.Lorsque cela ne me conviendra plus de contribuer pour notre système,je vais changer de province ou de pays,pas les gens qui m'entourent.<br />Pour l'instant ça me va!Point a la ligne.AngloBusternoreply@blogger.com