Monday, April 11, 2011

The Jewish Lobby Revisited

Click HERE for original page
I archive a lot of articles and snippets that I find while scanning what is probably 1,000 articles a day.
Every now and then I go through my RRS Reader to try and get rid of the stuff that is no longer pertinent.
Recently I came across the original post on Vigile.net by our good friend Robert Barberis-Gervais, which was the subject of much debate over accusations of antisemitism.

Now when the shit hit the fan whole affair broke into the mainstream press, the webmaster of Vigile.net, Mr. Bernard Frappier, removed some of the content from the contentious posts, inserting a note that certain parts were redacted because they were 'controversial.'

But the Internet being what it is, nothing is ever really lost and trying to get rid of something that you published, is like trying to put the genie back into the bottle.

And so I'm going to put back into the permanent Internet record exactly what he wrote, without the redactions. I've also provided a translation so that those without French can get a sense of the complete article as originally published.
The yellow part is what was redacted.
The Jewish lobby is responsible for the Michaud affair in 2000 and 2010

If the rich Jews of Montreal and Laval treat Francophone Quebeckers like Palestinians without respecting their right to self-determination, (and their language and own culture) with the same contempt as the Jews of Israel who have all the rights, while the Palestinians have none, it's high time that the truth be told.
I'm speaking of the Jews that summoned Lucien Bouchard to a meeting. I'm talking about Jews who got Lucien Bouchard all in a lather because some members of the Parti Quebecois protested because the Minister of Education was ready to change the universal pedagogical schedule to satisfy certain Jewish schools, which served as a pretext to mount a crisis against Pauline Marois. Lucien Bouchard, who is one of those responsible for the Michaud affair, is now working in a Jewish law firm, making lots of money by denying his own.
Lawyers like Jean Charest and Lucien Bouchard dragged the National Assembly into committing an injustice which denied an honourable private citizen his right to be heard. Like in Palestine where Jews deny Palestinians their rights by advancing their own interests before anything else.
 What was Mr. Michaud's crime? His crime was to question the unanimous political behaviour of the Jewish community who acted against Quebec independence. The Jews immediately viewed Mr. Michaud as an enemy. And their spokesman Lawrence Bergman made ​​a motion to humiliate he who dared to stand up to them at the expense of his right to be heard and to defend himself. For the Jewish lobby, it was of no importance. They had to destroy their adversary, It's wasn't important to respect his rights. That was the year 2000
Later on, when he became the"Robin Hood" of banks, Yves Michaud continued to thwart the interests of the Jewish lobby. It was therefore necessary to continue to humiliate him by arranging for the National Assembly to not acknowledge its mistake when it  unanimously passed the motion of December 14, 2000. The Jewish lobby, by funding the Liberal Party and for being a dominant economic force is responsible for the first Michaud affair of 2000 and the second Michaud case of 2010.
The Palestinians of the New World and one of its leaders, Yves Michaud, must understand once and for all that there is a big price to pay when you attack the Jewish lobby.
Yves Michaud continues to fight and remains un-intimidated by the Jewish lobby. Without denying anything I wrote so far, I say he deserves our support.
Here is the original French version.
"Le lobby juif est responsable de l'Affaire Michaud en 2000 et en 2010.
Si donc les riches Juifs de Montréal et de Laval traitent les Québécois français comme des Palestiniens sans respecter leur droit à l'autodétermination (et à leur langue et leur culture propre) avec le même mépris puisque les Juifs d'Israël ont tous les droits et que les Palestiniens n'ont aucun droit, il est grandement temps de dire la vérité : c'est le lobby juif qui s'appuie sur l'argent qu'il donne au Parti libéral et sur l'argent qu'il contrôle dans les banques et ailleurs dans la société qui est responsable de l'affaire Michaud.
Je parle des Juifs qui ont convoqué Mario Dumont à une rencontre. Je parle des Juifs qui font que Lucien Bouchard s'excite le poil de jambes parce que des députés du Parti québécois protestent parce que la ministre de l'Education est prête à changer le régime pédagogique et l'horaire prévu pour tout le monde pour accommoder quelques écoles juives ce qui sert de prétexte à Lucien Bouchard pour faire une crise contre Pauline Marois. Lucien Bouchard qui a été un des responsables de l'affaire Michaud travaille actuellement dans un bureau d'avocats juifs, fait beaucoup d'argent et renie les siens.
Des avocats comme Jean Charest et Lucien Bouchard, pour plaire au lobby juif, ont entraîné l'Assemblée nationale dans une injustice qui a privé un citoyen honorable de son droit à être entendu. Comme en Palestine où les Juifs privent les Palestiniens de leurs droits en faisant passer leurs intérêts avant toute chose.
Quel était le crime d'Yves Michaud ? Son crime a été de contester le comportement politique unanime de la communauté juive contre l'indépendance du Québec. Son crime a été de remettre en question le mépris des Juifs riches envers les Québécois. Les Juifs ont tout de suite vu que Michaud était un ennemi, leur ennemi. Et leur porte parole Lawrence Bergman a présenté une motion pour humilier celui qui osait leur tenir tête au détriment de son droit à être entendu et à se défendre. Mais pour le lobby juif, cela n'a pas d'importance. Il faut abattre l'adversaire. Ce n'est pas grave de ne pas respecter ses droits. C'était en 2000.
Puis, plus tard, en devenant le Robin des banques, Yves Michaud a continué contrecarrer les intérêts du lobby juif. Il fallait donc continuer à l'humilier en s'arrangeant pour que l'Assemblée nationale ne reconnaisse pas son erreur commise en votant à l'unanimité la motion du 14 décembre 2000. Le lobby juif en finançant le Parti libéral et en étant une force économique dominante est responsable de la première affaire Michaud de l'an 2000 et de la deuxième affaire Michaud de l'an 2010.
Les Palestiniens du Nouveau Monde, un de leurs leaders Yves Michaud, doivent comprendre une fois pour toutes qu'il y a un gros prix à payer quand on attaque le lobby juif.
Et bien Yves Michaud continue le combat et ne se laisse pas intimider par le lobby juif. Sans rien renier de ce que j'ai écrit jusqu'ici, je dis qu'il mérite notre appui.
***
Robert Barberis-Gervais, Vieux-Longueuil, 13 décembre 2010 View the redacted article on vigile.net
Now readers will decide for themselves whether the above post is antisemitic.
At any rate, it's probably a safe bet to say that Mr. Barberis-Gervais is no fan of Jews.

His article contains numerous falsehoods, most egregious, that Jews control our banks, a statement that sadly reveals his tenuous grip on reality. (Jews have almost nothing to do with our banks)
When he complains of the rich Jews of Laval, he exposes his geographical ignorance. (Rich Jews don't live in Laval.)

And so it's hard to take seriously anything Mr. Barberis-Gervais' writes. His attitude towards Jews and his predisposition to invent facts, made it easy for me to conclude that his improbable story about the lovely 'Isabelle and four Jews' just another flight of fancy.

Read Mr. Barberis-Gervais orignal post J’ai honte des Juifs racistes de Montréal{FR} (I'm ashamed of racist Jews")
Read my reply- "Four Jews and the lovely Isabelle"

In re-reading the article it occurs to me again that those who most deserve an apology, are the Palestinians. Mr Barberis-Gervais' comparison of the plight of Quebeckers to that of Palestinians is sadly delusional and makes a mockery of the very real tribulations that they are living through.

At any rate, let the readers decide...

33 comments:

  1. Is THAT all?

    Replace jews with francophones, rich jews with PQ, palestinians with anglophones, Laval with the plateau,nand banks with government and you have the standad No Dogs rant and thought process.

    It's kind of eerie actually. You're just two sides of the same coin. Except No Dogs is alot more prolic.

    ReplyDelete
  2. nand? standad? prolic?
    If not towards myself,at least be respectful of readers by making a small effort. Try a spellcheeeeeeker.
    Notwithstanding your opinion I shall remain 'prolic'

    ReplyDelete
  3. You try to write on a phone, oh mighty editor. Nice job avoiding my arguments btw.

    ReplyDelete
  4. From the original article...¸

    "In re-reading the article it occurs to me again that those who most deserve an apology, are the Palestinians. Mr Barberis-Gervais' comparison of the plight of Quebeckers to that of Palestinians is sadly delusional and makes a mockery of the very real tribulations that they are living through."

    How about the constant nazi references by yourself and your readers, does that make a mockery of the Holocaust?

    Naaaa.... that TOTALLY different ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  5. In 734 blog pieces the word Nazi, appears in 20 posts. So much for the 'constant reference'.
    Of these 20 posts, most references(e.g soup Nazi) have nothing to do with Quebeckers. The bulk of the rest are Francophones calling anglophones Nazis (Ivan Parent, Prefontaine etc.)
    Out of the 20 post there are three where you may find offence, wherein I compare the use the the "Nazi Big Lie" or a reference to the Wannasee conference.

    As for commentors, I am not responsible to for their content. I choose to publish these comments in the same why I choose to publish comments which call anglos 'colonizers.'

    I have never referred to anyone as a Nazi, who wasn't actually one. I have never used the word 'nazi' as a metaphor.

    If you're going to criticize, do so with facts, not slander.
    But of course it's easy to slag somebody with gratuitous and false accusations.

    ReplyDelete
  6. @anon 11:26

    Your leaders (because they definitely don't represent ethnic and and anglo interests in anyway) are the ones that made Quebec unilingual French only and brought bill 101 and made English Speakers and ethnics second class citizens in a province they contributed economically disproportionately more then their population. When they bring government sponsored equivalent "witch hunts" like reasonable accomadation estates general.

    Actions speak louder then words. The comparison to Nazis and stalinists (albeit in a much ligher form) is accurate. Only thing stopping seppie and franco chaunvanist scum from doing more is fear of the rest of canada. That is why they are try to eliminate English in Quebec via death by a thousand cuts.

    Of course your going to bring up all that Acadian deportation, when in the context of how the world worked back then it was similar to how the French would have treated populations it had conquered and would have been even more severe had the acadians not been white europeans. After all you revel in Dollard des Ormeaux.

    ReplyDelete
  7. http://www.vigile.net/Dossier-Mafia

    By the way, Vigile is doomed, they are now sue for 500,000 dollars and with they actual budget, they cant survive that.

    Rejoice?

    ReplyDelete
  8. "By the way, Vigile is doomed, they are now sue for 500,000 dollars and with they actual budget, they cant survive that."

    Encore de l'argent comme outil pour bâillonner la vérité qui dérange.Nous savons que Vigile dérange mais a ce point.Y'a anguille sous roche!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Typically making a comparison to Nazism is taking things obscenely over the top for making a point, an absurd and ridiculous extreme for any debate.

    What is frightening though, is these comparisons are not out of place, they are dead on. This is Quebec, a fertile place for uncontrolled racism, hatred and xenophobia. One of the few places in the civilized world where one can openly commit hate crimes in the mainstream media or form hate groups that target such groups and not be stopped by the government, police or public. Perhaps more scary, is praise is received rather than condemnation.

    In the 1930's the Brown Shirts thrived in this kind of environment, and eerie how (much like Quebec) it was happening under a climate of poor economic times and placing the blame and woes on the Jews. They started by smashing windows at synagogues (remember the seven that were attacked in Montreal, all on the same night?), anonymous complaints about religious displays in public and forced to remove them (have you see the recent incident at the Metro supermarket in Westmount) or just publishing hate pieces in newspapers (as we have now, in newspapers, on TV and on PQ supported websites).

    The Parti Quebecois actually funds Vigile.net and refuses to denounce them or stop their funding of support after racist attacks on Jews in Quebec. See this article:
    http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Opinions+website+revive+accusations/4507182/story.html

    Once you're reading that, see this article too:
    http://www.montrealgazette.com/Quebec+supermarket+reverses+stance+Jewish+symbol/4569541/story.html

    The parallels between the Quebecois and Brown Shirts/Nazis are very frightening. And for the record, the Nazis hid behind the excuse of protecting their race and culture for what they were doing, much like the Quebecois today. Quebec nationalistic movement and so-called protection of the French language are thinly veiled excuses to commit ethnic cleansing. Right now its soft cleansing, but when that fails, it will turn hard. Mark my words.

    ReplyDelete
  10. the anonymous ignoramus above:

    First, a little history lesson. I was one of those "rich Jews" who moved into Chomedey in 1961. The project in Chomedey was SUBSIDIZED! Yes, SUBSIDIZED! It was for families earning below a certain income.

    These were mostly semi-detached cottages and bungalows costing $12,500 (in 1961) with a 15-year subsidy on the interest (the first 3%). MOST JEWISH FAMILIES WHO MOVED IN HAD TO BORROW THE $500 DOWN PAYMENT FROM OTHER RELATIVES, including MY parents! So much for the stereotypical "rich Jews".

    What is so sad today is we have NO subsidized housing developments ANYWHERE! In the late 1950s, there was a recession and this was a win-win situation for low income earners in need of housing and job creation for the construction industry. Too bad we don't have this now, but I guess the construction industry is booming too much. Further discussion on this issue is for another time.

    Interestingly, a buddy of mine in Montreal was talking with a social worker in the Jewish community about the high cost of dying. Paperman and Sons is the only Jewish funeral home in Montreal, and they look to take full advantage of their monopoly wherever they can. The social worker stated about half of the Montreal Jewish population is living like paupers, and could barely afford the cost of burying themselves. While there are circumstances Paperman's has to provide for those who simply don't have the means to afford a more affluent funeral, they more than make sure they get more than their fair share back from those who could, or struggle to meet the cost. So much for "rich Jews". If anyone can name me one chartered bank in Canada, other than the Israeli banks, with a Jewish CEO, list it here!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous @ 12:56 PM: With any luck, if Vigile is being sued for a half mil, looks good on them. I hope they lose and beyond that charge its creator with hate crimes (unlikely unfortunately).

    ReplyDelete
  12. @ Apple IIGS

    "What is frightening though, is these comparisons are not out of place, they are dead on. This is Quebec, a fertile place for uncontrolled racism, hatred and xenophobia. One of the few places in the civilized world where one can openly commit hate crimes in the mainstream media or form hate groups that target such groups and not be stopped by the government, police or public. Perhaps more scary, is praise is received rather than condemnation."

    I have yet to see any "hate crimes" in the mainstream media, unless you consider this blog and the associated comments like yours mainstream. Hey editor, how about putting THAT comment in your blog with big blue letters.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Maxime Berné said...
    "By the way, Vigile is doomed, they are now sue for 500,000 dollars and with they actual budget, they cant survive that."

    'Encore de l'argent comme outil pour bâillonner la vérité qui dérange.Nous savons que Vigile dérange mais a ce point.Y'a anguille sous roche!'

    Max (I mean Préfontaine of the Losership) - tel qu'éxpliqué plusieurs fois: If you want to talk about using State money that the PQ-BQ were already using to fund this racist site, you should stick your comment up your butt. Furthermore, as described here:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hrUKndZUWE
    How much money is the Caisse de défauts using of OUR money (le VOTRE aussi) with their lawyers from Fasken-Martineau to hide how the $47BN was lost at the Caisse. That's right, all about using State tax money to hide the truth and preach lies - bien fait hypocrite!
    Regard the Retirees Association attack them with me: http://dbhive.blogspot.com/2010/10/retiree-association-firmly-onboard-with.html

    ReplyDelete
  14. "I have yet to see any "hate crimes" in the mainstream media, unless you consider this blog and the associated comments like yours mainstream. Hey editor, how about putting THAT comment in your blog with big blue letters."

    So a hate crime to you is words you don't agree with on a computer screen that only exist in cyberspace..... you make me sad.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hugo, good rebuttal! Finally saw you on that Tyranny of Bill 101 blog. Is there some way to contact you more directly?

    ReplyDelete
  16. @ Jason

    Well then, I'm still waiting for that list of mainstream "hate crimes"... put up or shut up.

    ReplyDelete
  17. "...you make me sad."

    Poor little jasonne,crying like a baby all night long.

    Les anglouilles ont du mal a gérer le backslash.
    Acceptez-donc votre condition de minoritaires et tout ira pour le mieux.Vous pourriez aussi vous joindre a nous en apprenant le Français qui n'est pas,comme vous semblez le croire,une langue aussi difficile a apprendre.Même un idiot peut l'apprendre a simplement observer l'affichage dans notre grande ville.

    ReplyDelete
  18. @Hugo Shebbeare

    Pauvre Hugo.Vous n'avez pas été viré de la caisse de dépôt parceque vous êtes anglo ou que vos compétences soit insuffisantes mais bien a cause de votre personnalité associale et réberbative au sein votre (ex)milieu de travail.Avec une telle attitude,vous ne pourriez même pas travailler dans un supermarché comme emballeur.Consultez Hugo...cosultez.

    ReplyDelete
  19. The Case of Despots is a joke anyway. The nice thing about it (at least from a Quebecois perspective) is that even if the management is stupid enough to blow it up (and seriously, buying a boatload of asset-back commercial paper and relying on the credit rating agencies, instead of doing their own credit research is mind-bogglingly stupid), the ROC will likely bail them out. Otherwise, it would be your choice of a) a slap in the face b) an insult or c)just another example of the ROC trying to hold Quebec down.

    ReplyDelete
  20. "@ Jason

    Well then, I'm still waiting for that list of mainstream "hate crimes"... put up or shut up."

    Gilles Proulx calling anglos blokes and squares heads on a mainstream broadcast political talkshow with absolutely no backlash. Refering to anglos in the news as "The English problem", or "Too much English creeping into communities" or "Anglicization of Montreal", likes we're a disease or something. Need more?

    Love the put up or shut up remark by the way, especially since you guys are then ones who always post emotionally without any evidence of anything, usually accompanied by some form of childish insult.

    "Acceptez-donc votre condition de minoritaires et tout ira pour le mieux"

    You're such a hypocrit it's sickening. You declare so publicly that you refuse to assimilate (even though nobody is asking you to) and will resist to the bitter end, and yet demand that others assimilate to you. Superiority complex anyone? If this logic was translated into parenthood you'd be telling your kids that drugs are bad while you were shooting up.

    "Poor little jasonne,crying like a baby all night long."

    I'm really starting to believe that you might be an infant. I've never before seen on a political forum/blog someone respond with so many schoolyard "disses" a la "I know you are but what am I". You never have anything intriguing to say other than some lame insult that only you could possibly think was clever. Do you really think I feel insulted, offended or angered by your comments? I feel nothing but disbelief and pity in your case.

    AND THIS GOES FOR EVERYONE. IF THEY WANT TO ALTER PEOPLE'S NAMES IN SOME SAD ATTEMPT AT HUMOUR TO DISTRACT FROM THEIR LACK OF SUBSTANCE, LET THEM. YOU BE THE GROWN UP AND LET THEM CALL YOU A DOODOO-HEAD ALL THEY LIKE.

    "Vous pourriez aussi vous joindre a nous en apprenant le Français qui n'est pas,comme vous semblez le croire,une langue aussi difficile a apprendre"

    I have learned French thank you. Have you learned English? If you have, good for you. If you haven't you should get on that. It's proven to be an easier language to learn than French which is supposedly so easy so there's no excuse. Even a retard can teach you. See how douchy it sounds when I say it? It's no different for you.

    "Vous n'avez pas été viré de la caisse de dépôt parceque vous êtes anglo ou que vos compétences soit insuffisantes mais bien a cause de votre personnalité associale et réberbative au sein votre (ex)milieu de travail.Avec une telle attitude,vous ne pourriez même pas travailler dans un supermarché comme emballeur.Consultez Hugo...cosultez."

    I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that you don't know Hugo or anything about his life, thus giving you absolutely no right to attack him so personally. You just come off as a jerk here.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Pour compléter votre dossier sur Robert Barberis-Gervais

    UN AUTRE SCOOP DE VIGILE

    Dans le même sac !
    Vigile, PQ, propos antisémites
    Tribune libre de Vigile, 9 avril 2011

    Malheur à vous, libéraux Charest, Bergman et Fournier
    Tribune libre de Vigile   1er avril 2011

    Lettre ouverte au député libéral Lawrence S. Bergman
    
au proposeur de la motion de blâme contre Yves Michaud

    Tribune libre de Vigile   23 mars 2011
     

    LETTRE OUVERTE DE JEAN CHAREST À RICHARD MARCEAU


    Ah ! mon ami Marceau...

    
continuons notre campagne de désinformation contre Vigile

    Tribune libre de Vigile   20 mars 2011


    JOSEPH FACAL, 205 ARTICLES RETIRÉS DU SITE VIGILE.NET : L’AFFAIRE VIGILE.NET

    Joseph Facal - un geste politique 
comme lors de l’affaire Michaud : on n’a pas lu les textes et les commentaires
    
Tribune libre de Vigile   18 mars 2011
     
    RICHARD MARCEAU DU COMITÉ CANADA-ISRAËL EST-IL COMPÉTENT ?
David Ouellette est un employé du Comité Québec-Israël

    
m’accuser d’être antisémite est du libelle diffamatoire

    Robert Barberis-Gervais, 12 avril 2011 


    ReplyDelete
  22. dossier de Robert Barberis-Gervais

    Ajouter:


    
La malhonnêteté de Jean-Marc Fournier n’a pas de limites



    Tribune libre de Vigile   28 mars 2011

    Robert Barberis-Gervais, Vieux-Longueuil, 12 avril 2011

    ReplyDelete
  23. "I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that you don't know Hugo or anything about his life..."

    Il est sur youtube et a peu près 12 blogues différents.Un vrai perroquet a propos de "La caisse de défaut"...Pitoyable.

    ReplyDelete
  24. @ Jason

    "Gilles Proulx calling anglos blokes and squares heads on a mainstream broadcast political talkshow with absolutely no backlash. Refering to anglos in the news as "The English problem", or "Too much English creeping into communities" or "Anglicization of Montreal", likes we're a disease or something. Need more?"

    Wow someone used the word Bloke, call the UN. Hate crime indeed! So... when's don Cherry going to prison already? And discussing the creeping anglicisation in Montréal is a hate crime? You know, that the expression "Hate crime" implies the existence of a CRIME, right?

    ReplyDelete
  25. @ Jason

    As an addendum to my previous post, here is an excerpt from a Statistics Canada study`

    "Provincial comparisons of hate crime are limited to Quebec, Ontario and British Columbia, where virtually 100% of all police services and detachments participated in the hate crime study.

    Police-reported hate crimes in these three provinces accounted for roughly 80% of the total number of hate crimes. The rate in Ontario was highest at 4.1 incidents per 100,000 population, followed by British Columbia (2.5) and Quebec (1.4)."

    Maybe you should look elsewhere for your hate crimes...

    ReplyDelete
  26. @ Anonymous,

    "Wow someone used the word Bloke, call the UN. Hate crime indeed!"

    Interesting how you ignored the term "square head." If someone on English television referred to Francophones as "pepsis" or "frogs", there would be an outcry in Quebec and apologies would be demanded.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Been there, done that, nobody cared (Doan incident).

    If that all you can come up with, Gilles Proulx saying Square head on V... call the UN! What are they doing wasting their time in Africa when there is real important racism going on here.

    ReplyDelete
  28. "Wow someone used the word Bloke, call the UN"

    Food for thought, hypocrit. When someone says "frog" we never hear the end of it. Is racial respect only one-sided?

    "So... when's don Cherry going to prison already?"

    Don Cherry's taken ALLOT of flak over the years for the things he's said from anglos and francos, unlike Proulx. And by the way, Don Cherry neever flat out insulted a race of people for being that race of people. He usually speaks in hockey references (Frenchmen and Europeans wear visors), which is much less important than a political talkshow with a guest that blatantly insults an entire race of people without any repercussions.

    "And discussing the creeping anglicisation in Montréal is a hate crime? You know, that the expression "Hate crime" implies the existence of a CRIME, right?"

    Duurrrrr ya think? I'm very well aware what constitutes an actual hate crime. I was speaking metaphorically in the same context as the anon who I was replying to. Take it up with him.

    "Police-reported hate crimes in these three provinces accounted for roughly 80% of the total number of hate crimes. The rate in Ontario was highest at 4.1 incidents per 100,000 population, followed by British Columbia (2.5) and Quebec (1.4).""

    How is this statistic, however intriguing it may be, relevant to open racism in mainstream media?

    ReplyDelete
  29. "What are they doing wasting their time in Africa when there is real important racism going on here."

    Proof you don't think things through. This very same sarcastic logic can be applied to the self-proclaimed "suffering" franco-supremacists are complaining about on a daily basis. Oh my God they don't want to give us the country that we don't even want to be a part of's money so we can have a hockey team we're too lazy to pay for! Call the UN!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Jasonne aime Donald La cerise.(Don Cherry)



    A lire ce blougue,j'ai parfois l'impression que la mort de mille Africains = La mort de 1 anglouille.Les anglouilles sont vraiment trop précieux.

    ReplyDelete
  31. "If that all you can come up with, Gilles Proulx saying Square head on V... call the UN! What are they doing wasting their time in Africa when there is real important racism going on here."

    You should keep in mind that Quebec has been criticized by the UN for violating the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

    ReplyDelete
  32. "for violating the Universal Declaration of Human Rights..."

    Imaginez maintenant les É.U.

    ReplyDelete
  33. @ Press 9 at 3:20 PM:

    So you support the violation of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights by Quebec because another jurisdiction supposedly did so?

    When did the United States contravene the Universal Declaration of Human Rights?

    From wikipedia:

    "Human rights in the United States are legally protected by the Constitution of the United States and amendments"

    "In the 20th century, the United States took a leading role in the creation of the United Nations and in the drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Much of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was modeled in part on the U.S. Bill of Rights."

    Quebec has also violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and even its own Charter of Rights and Freedoms, by attacking freedom of expression.

    ReplyDelete